Abstract
The ESA Swarm mission, launched on 22 November 2013, consists of three spacecraft each equipped with a Micro Advanced Stellar Compass (\(\mu \)ASC) from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Each \(\mu \)ASC features three Camera Head Units (CHUs) orientated orthogonally to optimize system accuracy performance and avoid simultaneous blinding. The image sensors inside the CHUs are sensitive to ionizing radiation. When an energetic particle impacts the image sensor, electrons are liberated along the particle’s ionizing track and appear on the source image as white dots dubbed ‘energetic particle detection’ (EPD) events.
For star tracker applications EPDs are normally supressed to support nominal attitude operation. However, in early 2018 software was uploaded to the \(\mu \)ASCs on-board Swarm, which on top of using the EPD measurements to improve the image for star tracking, is reporting the EPD count to the telemetry to ground. This added functionality enables detection and monitoring of high energy particles. By taking advantage of the sample rates (1-2 Hz), the orientation of the camera heads and simultaneous measurements from all three spacecraft spatial derivatives of the EDP aligned to electric and magnetic fields can be determined. Furthermore, since the Swarm spacecraft are in circular, near-polar orbits at an altitude of 450-510 km the spacecraft continuously monitor and map high energy particles at the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) of relevance for future mission planning as well as provide detailed time-radiation relations from charge injections processes from e.g. Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs). In this work we present processes and analysis of four years of high energy radiation data obtained from the Micro Advanced Stellar Compass (\(\mu \)ASC) on board ESA’s Swarm mission, from February 2018 to February 2022.
References
Becker HN, Alexander JW, Adriani A, Mura A, Cicchetti A, Noschese R (2017) The juno radiation monitoring (rm) investigation. Space Sci Rev 213:507–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0345-9
Casadio S, Arino O (2011) Monitoring the South Atlantic anomaly using atsr instrument series. Adv Space Res 48(6):1056–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.05.014
Connerney JE, Benn M, Bjarno JB, Denver T, Espley J, Jørgensen JL, Jørgensen PS, Lawton P, Malinnikova A (2017) The juno magnetic field investigation. Space Sci Rev 213:39–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0334-z
Finlay CC, Kloss C, Olsen N, Hammer MD, Tøffner-Clausen L, Grayver A, Kuvshinov A (2020) The chaos-7 geomagnetic feld model and observed changes in the sourth Atlantic anomaly. Planets Space 72:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9
Grigoryan OR, Romashova VV, Petrov AN (2008) Saa drift: experimental results. Adv Space Res 41(1):76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.015
Herceg M, Jørgensen PS, Jørgensen JL (2017) Characterization and compensation of thermo-elastic instability of swarm optical bench on micro advanced stellar compass attitude observations. Acta Astronaut 137:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.018
Herceg M, Jørgensen JL, Merayo JM, Denver T, Jørgensen PS, Benn M, Connerney JE (2022) Energetic electron lensing caused by the ganymede’s magnetic field. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10508071.1
Jones AD, Kanekal SG, Baker DN, Klecker B, Looper MD, Mazur JE, Schiller Q (2017) Sampex observations of the South Atlantic anomaly secular drift during solar cycles 22–24. Space Weather 15(1):44–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001525
Merayo JMG, Jørgensen JL, Friis-Christensen E, Brauer P, Jørgensen PS, Allin TH, Denver T (2008) The swarm magnetometry package. In: Small Satellites for Earth Observation, pp 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6943-7_13
Poivey C, Barth JL, LaBel KA, Gee G, Safren H (2003) In-flight observations of long-term single-event effect (see) performance on orbview-2 solid state recorders (ssr). In: IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop, pp 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/REDW.2003.1281357
Qin M, Zhang X, Ni B, Song H, Zou H, Sun Y (2014) Solar cycle variations of trapped proton flux in the inner radiation belt. J Geophys Res Space Phys 119(12):9658–9669. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020300
Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB): The Space Environment Information System (Spenvis). https://www.spenvis.oma.be/
Sawyer D, Vette J (1976) Ap-8 trapped proton environment for solar maximum and solar minimum. Technical Report N-77-18983; NASA-TM-X-72605
Shulman S (2018) Turning mms star sensors into high energy particle detectors. SpaceOps Conferences. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-2714
Tylka AJ, Adams JH Jr, Boberg PR, Brownstein B, Dietrich WF, Flueckiger EO, Petersen EL, Shea MA, Smart DF (1997) Creme96: a revision of the cosmic ray effects on micro electronics code. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 44(6):2150–2160. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.659030
Ye Y, Zou H, Zong Q, Chen H, Wang Y, Yu X, Shi W (2017) The secular variation of the center of geomagnetic South Atlantic anomaly and its effect on the distribution of inner radiation belt particles. Space Weather 15(11):1548–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001687
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toldbo, C., Sushkova, J., Herceg, M. et al. Mapping High Energy Particles Using Augmented Star Trackers On-Board Swarm. Space Sci Rev 218, 58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-022-00925-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-022-00925-z