Skip to main content
Log in

The Origins and Geological Histories of Deimos and Phobos: Hypotheses and Open Questions

  • Published:
Space Science Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative measurements and photographic imaging of the moons of Mars set limits on several key geological conclusions-such as the orbits of the moons. Other examples include their estimated bulk densities where Phobos has a density of ∼1.876 g/cm3 and Deimos has a lower and less certain density of ∼1.48 g/cm3. Imaging data reveals a low albedo of both moons – Phobos: ∼0.07; Deimos: ∼0.08. Also, Phobos manifests distinct redder and bluer units, whereas the surface of Deimos is globally comparable to the Phobos redder units with localized streaks of brighter material. Further, the libration of Phobos suggests interior density distributions potentially ranging from a generally homogeneous interior to a slightly heterogeneous composition, whereas Deimos lacks sufficient evidence to estimate its interior density distribution. Both moons are mantled in a global equivalent of dozens to hundreds of meters of regolith deposits, yet they differ in their surface characteristics. Other than scattered boulders and an underabundance of fresh craters, the surface of Deimos is generally smooth with most observable impact craters filled with regolith. Conversely, thousands of boulders are observed on Phobos, and the moon is heavily modified by larger craters that are crosscut by grooves and mantled with regolith deposits and smaller generally fresh and unfilled craters. Yet models that focus on many key questions are inadequately supported by definitive evidence, or lack definitive evidence altogether – and these questions must be considered open. For example, how were Deimos and Phobos produced? Where are their geological histories similar, and where do they diverge? Why are the global densities of Deimos and Phobos different from each other, and why are these densities less than typical rocky bodies? What are their present-day geochemical compositions, density distributions, and deeper interior structures? What are the natures of the Phobos red and blue surface units? When did the Stickney Crater (\(D \sim 9\) km) impact take place on Phobos and how did the Stickney impact alter the surface and interior of Phobos? How and when were the Phobos grooves produced? Do large impact craters on Mars emplace observable deposits of martian ejecta on the martian moons? Finally, how might we collect definitive evidence to address these open questions?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable (Review/Synthesis submission – no new research).

Code Availability

Not applicable (Review/Synthesis submission – no new research).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the insightful feedback and recommendations of the reviewers of this report. We found their detailed comments and suggestions to be very helpful in strengthening and clarifying the presentation and discussion of the final revised manuscript, and we thank them for their time and effort.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both co-authors contributed substantially to the development and writing this report.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth R. Ramsley.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramsley, K.R., Head, J.W. The Origins and Geological Histories of Deimos and Phobos: Hypotheses and Open Questions. Space Sci Rev 217, 86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00864-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00864-1

Keywords

Navigation