Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisiting the Sunspot Number

A 400-Year Perspective on the Solar Cycle

  • Published:
Space Science Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our knowledge of the long-term evolution of solar activity and of its primary modulation, the 11-year cycle, largely depends on a single direct observational record: the visual sunspot counts that retrace the last 4 centuries, since the invention of the astronomical telescope. Currently, this activity index is available in two main forms: the International Sunspot Number initiated by R. Wolf in 1849 and the Group Number constructed more recently by Hoyt and Schatten (Sol. Phys. 179:189–219, 1998a, 181:491–512, 1998b). Unfortunately, those two series do not match by various aspects, inducing confusions and contradictions when used in crucial contemporary studies of the solar dynamo or of the solar forcing on the Earth climate. Recently, new efforts have been undertaken to diagnose and correct flaws and biases affecting both sunspot series, in the framework of a series of dedicated Sunspot Number Workshops. Here, we present a global overview of our current understanding of the sunspot number calibration.

After retracing the construction of those two composite series, we present the new concepts and methods used to self-consistently re-calibrate the original sunspot series. While the early part of the sunspot record before 1800 is still characterized by large uncertainties due to poorly observed periods, the more recent sunspot numbers are mainly affected by three main inhomogeneities: in 1880–1915 for the Group Number and in 1947 and 1980–2014 for the Sunspot Number.

After establishing those new corrections, we then consider the implications on our knowledge of solar activity over the last 400 years. The newly corrected series clearly indicates a progressive decline of solar activity before the onset of the Maunder Minimum, while the slowly rising trend of the activity after the Maunder Minimum is strongly reduced, suggesting that by the mid 18th century, solar activity had already returned to levels equivalent to those observed in recent solar cycles in the 20th century. We finally conclude with future prospects opened by this epochal revision of the Sunspot Number, the first one since Wolf himself, and its reconciliation with the Group Number, a long-awaited modernization that will feed solar cycle research into the 21st century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46
Fig. 47
Fig. 48
Fig. 49
Fig. 50
Fig. 51
Fig. 52
Fig. 53
Fig. 54
Fig. 55
Fig. 56
Fig. 57
Fig. 58
Fig. 59
Fig. 60
Fig. 61
Fig. 62
Fig. 63
Fig. 64
Fig. 65
Fig. 66
Fig. 67
Fig. 68
Fig. 69
Fig. 70

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper, we will follow this conventional notation for the SN, with R Z and R i corresponding to the periods before and after 1981, respectively.

  2. A spot like a fine point is counted as one spot; a larger spot, but still without penumbra, gets the statistical weight 2, a smallish spot within a penumbra gets 3, and a larger one gets 5.

  3. When an observer at his instrument on any given day records g groups of spots with a total of f single spots, without regard to their size, then the derived relative sunspot number for that day is r=k(10g+f).

  4. Presumably meaning umbrae (spots) within each penumbra.

References

  • J.A. Abreu, J. Beer, F. Steinhilber, S.M. Tobias, N.O. Weiss, For how long will the current grand maximum of solar activity persist? Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 20109 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Arlt, Digitization of sunspot drawings by Staudacher, in 1749–1796. Sol. Phys. 247, 399–410 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Arlt, The solar butterfly diagram in the 18th century. Sol. Phys. 255, 143–153 (2009a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Arlt, The solar observations at Armagh Observatory in 1795–1797. Astron. Nachr. 330, 311–316 (2009b)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Arlt, The sunspot observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe. Astron. Nachr. 332, 805–814 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Arlt, A. Abdolvand, First solar butterfly diagram from Schwabe’s observations in 1825–1867, in Physics of Sun and Star Spots, ed. by D.P. Choudhary, K.G. Strassmeier. IAU Symposium 273, Ventura, California, USA, August 22–26, 2010. Proc. of IAU Symposium, vol. 273 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011), pp. 286–289

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Arlt, R. Leussu, N. Giese, K. Mursula, I.G. Usoskin, Sunspot positions and sizes for 1825–1867 from the observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 433, 3165–3172 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • K.T. Bachmann, H. Maymani, K. Nautiyal, V. te Velde, An analysis of solar-cycle temporal relationships among activity indicators. Adv. Space Res. 34, 274–281 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • S. Basu, A.-M. Broomhall, W.J. Chaplin, Y. Elsworth, Thinning of the Sun’s magnetic layer: the peculiar solar minimum could have been predicted. Astrophys. J. 758, 43 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • S. Basu, A.-M. Broomhall, W.J. Chaplin, Y. Elsworth, G.R. Davies, J. Schou, T.P. Larson, Comparing the internal structure of the Sun during the cycle 23 and cycle 24 minima. Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser. 478, 161 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D. Berghmans, R.A.M. van der Linden, P. Vanlommel, F. Clette, E. Robbrecht, History of the Sunspot Index: 25 years SIDC. Beitrage zur Geschichte der Geophysik und Kosmischen Physik VII(1), 7, 288 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bertello, R.K. Ulrich, J.E. Boyden, The Mount Wilson CaII K plage index time series. Sol. Phys. 264, 31–44 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Brandenburg, The case for a distributed solar dynamo shaped by near-surface shear. Astrophys. J. 625, 539–547 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • W. Brunner, Letter to editor from Zurich Observatory. Terr. Magn. 41(2), 210 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Casas, J.M. Vaquero, The sunspot catalogues of Carrington, Peters, and de la Rue: quality control and machine-readable versions. Sol. Phys. 289, 79–90 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Casas, J.M. Vaquero, M. Vázquez, Solar rotation in the 17th century. Sol. Phys. 234, 379–392 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • F. Clette, L. Lefèvre, Are the sunspots really vanishing? Anomalies in solar cycle 23 and implications for long-term models and proxies. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 2, A260000 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Clette, D. Berghmans, P. Vanlommel, R.A.M. Van der Linden, A. Koeckelenbergh, L. Wauters, From the Wolf number to the international sunspot index: 25 years of SIDC. Adv. Space Res. 40, 919–928 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • E.W. Cliver, Carrington, Schwabe, and the gold medal, Eos. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 86, 413–418 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • E.W. Cliver, L. Svalgaard, in Origins of the Wolf Sunspot Number Series: Geomagnetic Underpinning, AGU Fall Meeting, Abstract SH13A-1109 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.W. Cliver, F. Clette, L. Svalgaard, Recalibrating the Sunspot Number (SSN): The SSN workshops. Cent. Eur. Astrophys. Bull. 37(2), 401–416 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Cristo, J.M. Vaquero, F. Sánchez-Bajo, HSUNSPOTS: a tool for the analysis of historical sunspot drawings. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 73, 187–190 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Crowe, K.R. Lafortune, Herschel, (Friedrich) William [Wilhelm], in The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, ed. by T. Hockey (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 494–496

    Google Scholar 

  • W. de la Rue, B. Stewart, B. Loewy, Researches on solar physics. heliographical positions and areas of sun-spots observed with the kew photoheliograph during the years 1862 and 1863. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 159, 1–110 (1869)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. de Toma, G.A. Chapman, D.G. Preminger, A.M. Cookson, Analysis of sunspot area over two solar cycles. Astrophys. J. 770, 89 (2013a) (13 pp.)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • G. de Toma, G.A. Chapman, A.M. Cookson, D. Preminger, Temporal stability of sunspot umbral intensities: 1986–2012. Astrophys. J. Lett. 771, L22 (2013b) (4 pp.)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Eddy, The Maunder minimum. Science 192, 1189–1202 (1976)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • P. Foukal, An explanation of the differences between the sunspot area scales of the Royal Greenwich and Mt. Wilson Observatories, and the SOON program. Sol. Phys. 289, 1517–1529 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • T.K. Friedli, Erste beobachtungen am Wolfschen Normal refraktor in Schliern b, Köniz. Mitt. Rudolf-Wolf-Ges. 3(9), 3–46 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • T.K. Friedli, H.U. Keller, Rudolf Wolf als Pionier der Sonnenfleckenforschung. Vierteljahrsschr. Nat.forsch. Ges. Zür. 138(4), 267–281 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Galilei, J.C. Scheiner, On Sunspot Translated and Introduced by, Reeves, E. and van Helden, A. (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.N. Gnevyshev, A.I. Ohl, Astron. Zh. 25, 18 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Hathaway, Royal Observatory, Greenwich—USAF/NOAA Sunspot Data (2014). http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/greenwch.shtml

  • D.H. Hathaway, R.M. Wilson, E.J. Reichmann, Group sunspot numbers: sunspot cycle characteristics. Sol. Phys. 211, 357–370 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Heilbron, The Sun in the Church (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999), 366 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hempelmann, W. Weber, Correlation between the sunspot number, the total solar irradiance, and the terrestrial insolation. Sol. Phys. 277, 417–430 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Hossfield, A history of the Zurich and American relative sunspot number indices. J. Am. Assoc. Var. Star Obs. 31, 48–53 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, A new look at Wolf sunspot numbers in the late 1700’s. Sol. Phys. 138, 387–397 (1992a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, New information on solar activity, 1779–1818, from Sir William Herschel’s unpublished notebooks. Astrophys. J. 384, 361–384 (1992b)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, Overlooked sunspot observations by Hevelius in the early Maunder Minimum, 1653–1684. Sol. Phys. 160, 371–378 (1995a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, Observations of sunspots by Flamsteed during the Maunder Minimum. Sol. Phys. 160, 379–385 (1995b)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, A new interpretation of Christian Horrebow’s sunspot observations from 1761 to 1777. Sol. Phys. 160, 387–392 (1995c)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, A revised listing of the number of sunspot groups made by Pastorff, 1819 to 1833. Sol. Phys. 160, 393–399 (1995d)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, How well was the Sun observed during the Maunder minimum? Sol. Phys. 165, 181–192 (1996)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, The Role of the Sun in Climate Change (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Sol. Phys. 179, 189–219 (1998a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Sol. Phys. 181, 491–512 (1998b)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.V. Hoyt, K.H. Schatten, E. Nesme-Ribes, The one hundredth year of Rudolf Wolf’s death: Do we have the correct reconstruction of solar activity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 2067–2070 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • K. Hufbauer, Exploring the Sun: Solar Science since Galileo (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Javaraiah, Long-term variations in the growth and decay rates of sunspot groups. Sol. Phys. 270, 463–483 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Johnson, Address delivered by the President, M.J. Johnson, Esq. on presenting the Medal of the Society to M. Schwabe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 17, 126–132 (1857)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Johnson, Power law relating 10.7 cm flux to sunspot number. Astrophys. Space Sci. 332, 73–79 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • H. Kant, Scheiner, Christoph, in The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, ed. by T. Hockey (Springer, Berlin, 2007), p. 1018

    Google Scholar 

  • H.U. Keller, T.K. Friedli, The sunspot-activity in the years 1976–1995. Mitt. Rudolf-Wolf-Ges. 3(7), 1–46 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • K.O. Kiepenheuer, Solar site testing, in Le choix des sites d’observatoires astronomiques (site testing), ed. by J. Rösch. IAU Symposium, vol. 19 (1962), pp. 193–219

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kilcik, V.B. Yurchyshyn, V. Abramenko, P.R. Goode, A. Ozguc, J.P. Rozelot, W. Cao, Time distributions of large and small sunspot groups over four solar cycles. Astrophys. J. 731, 30 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kopecky, B. Ruzickova-Topolova, G.V. Kuklin, On the relative inhomogeneity of long-term series of sunspot indices. Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. 31, 267–283 (1980)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • N.A. Krivova, L. Balmaceda, S.K. Solanki, Reconstruction of solar total irradiance since 1700 from the surface magnetic flux. Astron. Astrophys. 467, 335–346 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Lalande, Astronomie (1771), Paris, 4 Vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Lefèvre, F. Clette, A global small sunspot deficit at the base of the index anomalies of solar cycle 23. Astron. Astrophys. 536, L11 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • V. Letfus, Solar activity in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries—A revision. Sol. Phys. 145, 377–388 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • V. Letfus, Daily relative sunspot numbers 1749–1848: reconstruction of missing observations. Sol. Phys. 184, 201–211 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • V. Letfus, Relative sunspot numbers in the first half of eighteenth century. Sol. Phys. 194, 175–184 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Leussu, I.G. Usoskin, R. Arlt, K. Mursula, Inconsistency of the Wolf sunspot number series around 1848. Astron. Astrophys. 559, A28 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • W. Livingston, M. Penn, Are sunspots different during this solar minimum? EOS Trans. 90, 257–258 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Locarno, Specola Solare Ticinese Drawings, Archive (2014). http://www.specola.ch/e/drawings.html

  • M. Lockwood, Reconstruction and prediction of variations in the open solar magnetic flux and interplanetary conditions. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 10, 4 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Lockwood, A.P. Rouillard, I.D. Finch, The rise and fall of open solar flux during the current grand solar maximum. Astrophys. J. 700, 937–944 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Lockwood, M.J. Owens, L. Barnard, Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width: 1. Correction of the sunspot number record since 1874. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119 (2014, in press). doi:10.1002/2014JA019970, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014JA019970/pdf

  • E. Loomis, Am. J. Sci. Ser 50, 153 (1870)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Lukianova, K. Mursula, Changed relation between sunspot numbers, solar UV/EUV radiation and TSI during the declining phase of solar cycle 23. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 73, 235–240 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • E.F. MacPike, Hevelius, Flamsteed and Halley: Three Contemporary Astronomers and Their Mutual Relations (Taylor and Francis, London, 1937)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • E. Manfredi, De Gnomone Meridiano Bononiensi ad Divi Petronii, Laeli a Vulpa, Bononiae (1736, 397 pp.)

  • W.M. Mitchell, The history of the discovery of the solar spots. Pop. Astron. 24, 22–31, 82–96, 149–162, 206–218, 290–303, 341–354, 428–440, 488–499 (1916)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Muñoz-Jaramillo, D. Nandy, P.C.H. Martens, A.R. Yeates, A double-ring algorithm for modeling solar active regions: unifying kinematic dynamo models and surface flux-transport simulations. Astrophys. J. 720, L20–L25 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Muñoz-Jaramillo, D. Nandy, P.C.H. Martens, Magnetic quenching of turbulent diffusivity: reconciling mixing-length theory estimates with kinematic dynamo models of the solar cycle. Astrophys. J. 727, L23 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Y.A. Nagovitsyn, A.A. Pevtsov, W.C. Livingston, On a possible explanation of the long-term decrease in sunspot field strength. Astrophys. J. 758, L20 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • H. Nevanlinna, New geomagnetic activity index series published for 1844–1880. EOS Trans. 76, 233 (1995)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • H. Nevanlinna, E. Kataja, An extension of the geomagnetic activity index series aa for two solar cycles (1844–1868). Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2703–2706 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Ostrow, M. PoKempner, The differences in the relationship between ionospheric critical frequencies and sunspot number for different sunspot cycles. J. Geophys. Res. 57(4), 473–481 (1952). doi:10.1029/JZ057i004p00473

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Owens, M. Lockwood, Cyclic loss of open solar flux since 1868: The link to heliospheric current sheet tilt and implications for the Maunder Minimum. J. Geophys. Res. 117, 4102 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.G. Parker, J.M. Pap, R.K. Ulrich, L.E. Floyd, D.K. Prinz, in Developing New Mount Wilson Magnetic Indices to Model Solar UV Variations, SPD meeting #28, #02.54. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 29 (American Astronomical Society, Washington, 1997), p. 902

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Penn, W. Livingston, Long-term evolution of sunspot magnetic fields. IAU Symp. 273, 126–133 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • K. Petrovay, Solar cycle prediction. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 7, 6 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Pevtsov, L. Bertello, A.G. Tlatov, A. Kilcik, Y.A. Nagovitsyn, E.W. Cliver, Cyclic and long-term variation of sunspot magnetic fields. Sol. Phys. 289, 593–602 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Ribes, E. Nesme-Ribes, The solar sunspot cycle in the Maunder minimum AD1645 to AD1715. Astron. Astrophys. 276, 549–563 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Rybanský, V. Rušin, M. Minarovjech, L. Klocok, E.W. Cliver, Reexamination of the coronal index of solar activity. J. Geophys. Res. 110, 8106 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Schaefer, Visibility of sunspots. Astrophys. J. 411, 909–919 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Schaefer, Automatic inflation in the AAVSO sunspot number. J. Am. Assoc. Var. Star Obs. 26, 40–46 (1997a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Schaefer, Improvements for the AAVSO sunspot number. J. Am. Assoc. Var. Star Obs. 26, 47–49 (1997b)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • K.H. Schatten, Modeling a shallow solar dynamo. Sol. Phys. 255, 3–38 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • C.J. Schrijver, W.C. Livingston, T.N. Woods, R.A. Mewaldt, The minimal solar activity in 2008–2009 and its implications for long-term climate modeling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, 6701 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Schwabe, Sonnen-Beobachtungen im Jahre 1843. Astron. Nachr. 21, 233 (1844)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • N.K. Sethi, M.K. Goel, K.K. Mahajan, Solar cycle variations of f°F2 from IGY to 1990. Ann. Geophys. 20, 1677–1685 (2002). doi:10.5194/angeo-20-1677-2002

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A.I. Shapiro, W. Schmutz, E. Rozanov, M. Schoell, M. Haberreiter, A.V. Shapiro, S. Nyeki, A new approach to the long-term reconstruction of the solar irradiance leads to large historical solar forcing. Astron. Astrophys. 529, A67 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Shapley, Reduction of sunspot-number observations. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 61, 13–21 (1949)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Shirley, Thomas Harriot: A Biography (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.K. Solanki, N.A. Krivova, Solar irradiance variations: from current measurements to long-term estimates. Sol. Phys. 224, 197–208 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • S.K. Solanki, I.G. Usoskin, B. Kromer, M. Schüssler, J. Beer, Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature 431, 1084–1087 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • C.P. Sonett, The great solar anomaly ca. 1780–1800—an error in compiling the record. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 3225–3228 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonne, Fachgruppe Sonne (2014). http://www.vds-sonne.de/index.php

  • G. Spörer, Vierteljahrsschr. Astron. Ges. 22, 323 (1887)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.O. Stenflo, Basal magnetic flux and the local solar dynamo. Astron. Astrophys. 547, A93 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • L. Svalgaard, Updating the historical sunspot record, in SOHO-23: Understanding a Peculiar Solar Minimum, Proceedings of a workshop held 21–25 September 2009 in Northeast Harbor, Maine, USA, ed. by S.R. Cranmer, J.T. Hoeksema, J.L. Kohl. ASP Conference Series, vol. 428 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2010), p. 297

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Svalgaard, Solar activity—past, present, future. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 3, A24 (2013a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • L. Svalgaard, Building a Sunspot Group Number Backbone Series SSN-Workshop 3 (Tucson) (2013b). http://www.leif.org/research/SSN/Svalgaard11.pdf

  • L. Svalgaard, Corrections of errors in scale values for magnetic elements for Helsinki. Ann. Geophys. 32, 633–641 (2014a). doi:10.5194/angeo-32-633-2014

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • L. Svalgaard, What can geomagnetism can tell us about the solar cycle? Space Sci. Rev. (2014b, this volume)

  • L. Svalgaard, E.W. Cliver, in Calibrating the Sunspot Number: Using “the Magnetic Needle”, AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts 5454B-02 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Svalgaard, H.S. Hudson, The solar microwave flux and the sunspot number, in SOHO-23: Understanding a Peculiar Solar Minimum, Proceedings of a Workshop Held 21–25 September 2009 in Northeast Harbor, Maine, USA, ed. by S.R. Cranmer, J.T. Hoeksema, J.L. Kohl. ASP Conference Series, vol. 428 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2010), p. 325

    Google Scholar 

  • K.F. Tapping, D. Boteler, P. Charbonneau, A. Crouch, A. Manson, H. Paquette, Solar magnetic activity and total irradiance since the Maunder minimum. Sol. Phys. 246, 309–326 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • T.N. Thiele, De Macularum Solis antiquioribus quibusdam obstervationibus Hafniae institutis, scripsit Th.N. Thiele, astr. stud. Astron. Nachr. 50, 257 (1859)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Tlatov, Long-term variations in sunspot characteristics. Geomagn. Aeron. 53, 953–956 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Tlatov, V.V. Vasileva, V.V. Makarova, P.A. Otkidychev, Applying an automatic image-processing method to synoptic observations. Sol. Phys. 289, 1403–1412 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • I.G. Usoskin, K. Mursula, G.A. Kovaltsov, Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century? Astron. Astrophys. 370, L31–L34 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • I.G. Usoskin, K. Mursula, G.A. Kovaltsov, Reconstruction of monthly and yearly group sunspot numbers from sparse daily observations. Sol. Phys. 218, 295–305 (2003)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • I.G. Usoskin, K. Mursula, R. Arlt, G.A. Kovaltsov, A solar cycle lost in 1793–1800: Early sunspot observations resolve the old mystery. Astrophys. J. 700, L154–L157 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • I.G. Usoskin, S.K. Solanki, G.A. Kovaltsov, Grand minima of solar activity during the last millennia. IAU Symp. 286, 372–382 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • I.G. Usoskin, G. Hulot, Y. Gallet, R. Roth, A. Licht, F. Joos, G.A. Kovaltsov, E. Thébault, A. Khokhlov, Evidence for distinct modes of solar activity. Astron. Astrophys. 562, L10 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, On the solar activity during the year 1784. Sol. Phys. 219, 379–384 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, Historical sunspot observations: a review. Adv. Space Res. 40, 929–941 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, M.C. Gallego, Reconstructing past solar activity using meridian solar observations: the case of the Royal Observatory of the Spanish Navy (1833–1840). Adv. Space Res. 53, 1162–1168 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, R.M. Trigo, Revised group sunspot number values for 1640, 1652, and 1741. Sol. Phys. 289, 803–808 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, M. Vázquez, The Sun Recorded Through History. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 361 (Springer, Berlin, 2009), 382 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, F. Sánchez-Bajo, M.C. Gallego, On the reliability of the de la Rue sunspots areas measurements. Sol. Phys. 209, 311–319 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, M.C. Gallego, R.M. Trigo, The sunspot numbers during 1736–1739 revisited. Adv. Space Res. 40, 1895–1903 (2007a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, M.C. Gallego, F. Sánchez-Bajo, Improving sunspot records: observations by M. Hell revisited. Observatory 127, 221–224 (2007b)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, M.C. Gallego, I.G. Usoskin, G.A. Kovaltsov, Revisited sunspot data: a new scenario for the onset of the Maunder minimum. Astrophys. J. Lett. 731, L24 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Vaquero, R.M. Trigo, M.C. Gallego, A simple method to check the reliability of annual sunspot number in the historical period 1610–1847. Sol. Phys. 277, 389–395 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • L.E.A. Vieira, S.K. Solanki, N.A. Krivova, I. Usoskin, Evolution of the solar irradiance during the Holocene. Astron. Astrophys. 531, A6 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Waldmeier, Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich, No. 152 (1948)

  • M. Waldmeier, The sunspot-activity in the years 1610–1960 (Schulthess & Co., Swiss Federal Observatory, Zürich, 1961)

  • M. Waldmeier, Die Beziehung zwischen der Sonnenflecken-relativ-zahl und der Gruppenzahl. Astr. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw Zürich No. 285 (1968)

  • Y.-M. Wang, J.L. Lean, N.R. Sheeley Jr., Modeling the Sun’s magnetic field and irradiance since 1713. Astrophys. J. 625, 522–538 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Willis, H.E. Coffey, R. Henwood, E.H. Erwin, D.V. Hoyt, M.N. Wild, W.F. Denig, The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874–1976): summary of the observations, applications, datasets, definitions and errors. Sol. Phys. 288, 117–139 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Wilson, D.H. Hathaway, On the Relation Between Sunspot Area and Sunspot Number. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 6, 20186 (2006)

  • R. Wolf, Sonnenflecken Beobachtungen in der zweiten Hälfte des Jahres 1850. Mitt. Nat.forsch. Ges. Bern 207, 89–95 (1851)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Mitteilungen über die Sonnenflecken, I. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 1, 3–13 (1856)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Mitteilungen über die Sonnenflecken, IV. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 1, 51–78 (1857)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Abstract of his latest results. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 21, 77–78 (1861a)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Mittheilungen über die Sonnenflecken, XII. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 2, 41–82 (1861b)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Mittheilungen über die Sonnenflecken, XIII. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 2, 83–118 (1861c)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Mittheilungen über die Sonnenflecken, XIV. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 2, 119–132 (1862)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Astronomische Mittheilungen, XXXV. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 4, 173–250 (1874)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Astronomische Mittheilungen, XXXVIII. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 4, 375–405 (1875)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Astronomische Mittheilungen, LI. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 6, 1–32 (1880)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wolf, Astronomische Mittheilungen, LVI. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 6, 177–220 (1882)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Wolfer, Astronomische Mittheilungen, LXXXVI. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 9, 187–232 (1895)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Wolfer, Revision of Wolf’s sunspot relative numbers. Pop. Astron. 10, 449–458 (1902)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Wolfer, Astronomische Mittheilungen, XCVIII. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Zürich 10, 251–281 (1907)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • N.V. Zolotova, D.I. Ponyavin, Was the unusual solar cycle at the end of the XVIII century a result of phase asynchronization? Astron. Astrophys. 470, L17–L20 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • N.V. Zolotova, D.I. Ponyavin, Enigma of the solar cycle 4 still not resolved. Astrophys. J. 736, 115 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of the work contributed here by F. Clette was developed in the framework of the TOSCA project (ESSEM COST action ES1005 of the European Union; http://lpc2e.cnrs-orleans.fr/~ddwit/TOSCA/Home.html), of the SOLID project (EU 7th Framework Program, SPACE collaborative projects; http://projects.pmodwrc.ch/solid/) and of the Solar-Terrestrial Center of Excellence (http://www.stce.be). F. Clette would like to acknowledge the personal contributions from Laure Lefèvre and Laurence Wauters.

L. Svalgaard acknowledges support from Stanford University.

J.M. Vaquero acknowledges support from the Junta de Extremadura (Research Group Grant No. GR10131) and the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government (AYA2011-25945).

The authors also wish to thank Sergio Cortesi, Marco Cagnotti and Michele Bianda for their hospitality and help for our various investigations on the Locarno and Zürich observations.

The Sunspot Number Workshop series has benefitted from the support of the Royal Observatory of Belgium, the National Solar Observatory, Stanford University, the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Specola Solare Ticinese.

Finally, the authors are also grateful to Rainer Arlt for his detailed reviewing work and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. World Data Center SILSO, Observatoire Royal de Belgique, Brussels, Belgium

    Frédéric Clette

  2. W.W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Leif Svalgaard

  3. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Extremadura, Mérida, Spain

    José M. Vaquero

  4. National Solar Observatory, Sunspot, NM, USA

    Edward W. Cliver

Authors
  1. Frédéric Clette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leif Svalgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José M. Vaquero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edward W. Cliver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Clette.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M. et al. Revisiting the Sunspot Number. Space Sci Rev 186, 35–103 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation