Abstract
Direct numerical simulations of the geodynamo and other planetary dynamos have been successful in reproducing the observed magnetic fields. We first give an overview on the fundamental properties of planetary magnetism. We review the concepts and main results of planetary dynamo modeling, contrasting them with the solar dynamo. In planetary dynamos the density stratification plays no major role and the magnetic Reynolds number is low enough to allow a direct simulation of the magnetic induction process using microscopic values of the magnetic diffusivity. The small-scale turbulence of the flow cannot be resolved and is suppressed by assuming a viscosity far in excess of the microscopic value. Systematic parameter studies lead to scaling laws for the magnetic field strength or the flow velocity that are independent of viscosity, indicating that the models are in the same dynamical regime as the flow in planetary cores. Helical flow in convection columns that are aligned with the rotation axis play an important role for magnetic field generation and forms the basis for a macroscopic α-effect. Depending on the importance of inertial forces relative to rotational forces, either dynamos with a dominant axial dipole or with a small-scale multipolar magnetic field are found. Earth is predicted to lie close to the transition point between both classes, which may explain why the dipole undergoes reversals. Some models fit the properties of the geomagnetic field in terms of spatial power spectra, magnetic field morphology and details of the reversal behavior remarkably well. Magnetic field strength in the dipolar dynamo regime is controlled by the available power and found to be independent of rotation rate. Predictions for the dipole moment agree well with the observed field strength of Earth and Jupiter and moderately well for other planets. Dedicated dynamo models for Mercury, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, which assume stably stratified layers above or below the dynamo region, can explain some of the unusual field properties of these planets.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
B.J. Anderson, M.H. Acuña, H. Korth et al., Science 321, 82 (2008)
J. Aubert, D. Brito, H.C. Nataf, P. Cardin, J.P. Masson, Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 128, 51 (2001)
J. Bloxham, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 87, 669 (1989)
D. Breuer, S.A. Hauck II, M. Buske, M. Pauer, T. Spohn, Space Sci. Rev. 229–260, 132 (2007)
A.S. Brun, M.S. Miesch, J. Toomre, Astrophys. J. 614, 1073 (2004)
B.A. Buffett, J. Bloxham, Geophys. J. Int. 149, 211 (2002)
F.H. Busse, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 42, 437 (1975)
P. Caligari, F. Moreno-Insertis, M. Schüssler, Astrophys. J. 441, 886 (1995)
P. Charbonneau, Living Rev. Sol. Phys. (2005). http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2005-2
U.R. Christensen, J. Fluid Mech. 470, 115 (2002)
U.R. Christensen, Nature 444, 1056 (2006)
U.R. Christensen, J. Aubert, Geophys. J. Int. 166, 97 (2006)
U.R. Christensen, P. Olson, Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 138, 39 (2003)
U.R. Christensen, P. Olson, G.A. Glatzmaier, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 1565 (1998)
U.R. Christensen, P. Olson, G.A. Glatzmaier, Geophys. J. Int. 138, 393 (1999)
U.R. Christensen, A. Tilgner, Nature 429, 169 (2004)
U.R. Christensen, J. Wicht, in Core Dynamics, ed. by G. Schubert. Treatise of Geophysics, vol. 8 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 245–282
U.R. Christensen, J. Wicht, Icarus 196, 16 (2008)
V. Courtillot, P. Olson, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 260, 495 (2007)
Y. Fan, Living Rev. Sol. Phys. (2004). http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2004-1
C.C. Finlay, A. Jackson, Science 300, 2084 (2003)
G.A. Glatzmaier, R.S. Coe, L. Hongre, P.H. Roberts, Nature 401, 885 (1999)
G.A. Glatzmaier, P.H. Roberts, Nature 337, 203 (1995)
G.A. Glatzmaier, P.H. Roberts, Physica D 97, 81 (1996)
G.A. Glatzmaier, P.H. Roberts, Contemp. Phys. 38, 269 (1997)
N. Gómez-Pérez, M. Heimpel, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 101, 371 (2007)
E. Grote, F.H. Busse, Phys. Rev. 62, 4457 (2000)
E. Grote, F.H. Busse, A. Tilgner, Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 117, 259 (2000)
D. Gubbins, J. Bloxham, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 80, 695 (1985)
M. Heimpel, J.M. Aurnou, F.M. Al-Shamali, N. Gómez-Pérez, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236, 542 (2005)
D.W. Hughes, R. Rosner, N.O. Weiss, The Solar Tachocline (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)
N. Ishihara, S. Kida, J. Fluid Mech. 465, 1 (2002)
A. Jackson, A.R.T. Jonkers, M.R. Walker, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 358, 957 (2000)
A. Kageyama, T. Sato, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4617 (1997)
M. Korte, C.G. Constable, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 6, Q02H16 (2005)
F. Krause, K.-H. Rädler, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980)
W. Kuang, J. Bloxham, Nature 389, 371 (1997)
W. Kuang, J. Bloxham, J. Comput. Phys. 153, 51 (1999)
C. Kutzner, U.R. Christensen, Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 131, 29 (2002)
C. Kutzner, U.R. Christensen, Geophys. J. Int. 157, 1105 (2004)
J.L. Margot, S.J. Peale, M.A. Slade, I.V. Holin, Science 316, 710 (2007)
S. Maus, M. Rother, C. Stolle et al., Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7, Q07008 (2006)
M.S. Miesch, Living Rev. Sol. Phys. (2005). http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2005-1
F. Nimmo, in Core Dynamics, ed. by G. Schubert. Treatise of Geophysics, vol. 8 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 31–65
N. Olsen, G. Hulot, T.J. Sabaja, in Geomagnetism, ed. by G. Schubert. Treatise of Geophysics, vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 33–75
P. Olson, J. Aurnou, Nature 402, 170 (1999)
P. Olson, U.R. Christensen, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 250, 561 (2006)
P. Olson, U.R. Christensen, G.A. Glatzmaier, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 10,383 (1999)
M. Ossendrijver, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 11, 287 (2003)
V. Rama Murthy, W. van Westrenen, Y. Fei, Nature 423, 163 (2003)
P.H. Roberts, in Geomagnetism, vol. 2, ed. by J. Jacobs (Academic Press, London, 1987), pp. 251–306
M. Schrinner, K.-H. Rädler, D. Schmitt, M. Rheinhardt, U. Christensen, Astron. Nachr. 326, 245 (2005)
M. Schrinner, K.-H. Rädler, D. Schmitt, M. Rheinhardt, U. Christensen, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 101, 81 (2007)
R. Simitev, F.H. Busse, J. Fluid Mech. 532, 365 (2005)
B. Sreenivasan, C.A. Jones, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L20301 (2005)
B. Sreenivasan, C.A. Jones, Geophys. J. Int. 164, 467 (2006)
S. Stanley, J. Bloxham, Nature 428, 151 (2004)
S. Stanley, J. Bloxham, Icarus 184, 556 (2006)
S. Stanley, J. Bloxham, W.E. Hutchison, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 234, 341 (2005)
S.V. Starchenko, C.A. Jones, Icarus 157, 426 (2002)
D.J. Stevenson, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 12, 139 (1979)
D.J. Stevenson, Science 208, 746 (1980)
D.J. Stevenson, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 21, 113 (1982)
D.J. Stevenson, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 208, 1 (2003)
F. Takahashi, M. Matsushima, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L10202 (2006)
F. Takahashi, M. Matsushima, Y. Honkura, Science 309, 459 (2005)
J.A. Tarduno, R.D. Cottrell, M.K. Watkeys, D. Bauch, Nature 466, 657 (2007)
J. Wicht, Geophys. J. Int. 162, 371 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Christensen, U.R., Schmitt, D. & Rempel, M. Planetary Dynamos from a Solar Perspective. Space Sci Rev 144, 105–126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9449-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9449-6