Promoting Entrepreneurship through a Community Learning Model – Case Study: Green Businesses

Abstract

This article presents a community learning model formulated by Engineers Without Borders Colombia with the aim of providing communities with tools to create sustainable productive solutions which have relevancy for members and for potential customers. The goal of this formulation is to promote learning processes that are guided by decisions made by community members to propose sustainable and replicable initiatives. The model applicability is evidenced through a case study devoted to strengthening community-led green businesses in the Guavio Province, Colombia by collecting lessons and conclusions. Ultimately, this collection will prove useful in replicating the learning model in other similar rural communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Alegre J, Chiva R, Lapiedra R (2007) Measuring organizational learning capability among the workforce. Int J Manpow 28(3/4):224–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali MM, Yadav SKS, Nedelea AM (2017) Practicing green business with special reference to India: perception and cognizance of researchers. Ecoforum 6(1)

  3. Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method and practice Reading. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baquero AF, Giraldo M, Guarín A (2010) ANÁLISIS DE LA CADENA DE SUMINISTRO DE FRUTAS Y VERDURAS PARA BOGOTÁ D.C. Bogotá

  6. Brown T, Wyatt J (2010) Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved May 15, 2018 from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation

  7. Burns C, Cottam H, Vanstone C, Wihall J (2006) Red paper 02: transformation design. Design council, London. Retrieved December 6, 2018, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/resources/report/red-paper-02-transformation-design

  8. Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá (2006) Descripción de la provincia del Guavio. Retrieved April 21, 2018, from https://isfcolombia.uniandes.edu.co/images/documentos/descripcionprovinciaguavio.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  9. Čekanavičius L, Bazytė R, Dičmonaitė A (2014) Green business: challenges and practices. Ekonomika 93(1):74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coghlan D, Shani A (2014) IDEA: a collaborative organizational design process integrating innovation, design, engagement, and action. Syst Pract Action Res 26:523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Guerre D, Séguin D, Pace A, Burke N (2013) IDEA: a collaborative organizational design process integrating innovation, design, engagement, and action. Syst Pract Action Res 26:257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan RB, Weiss A (1979) Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In: Staw B (ed) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, p 75–123

    Google Scholar 

  13. Espejo R, Schuhmann W, Schwaninger M, Bilello U (1996) Organizational transformation and learning. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Estensoro M (2015) How can social innovation be facilitated? Experiences from an action research process in a local network. Syst Pract Action Res 28:527–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fontaine SJ (2006) Integrating community-based participatory research into the curriculum. JHEOE 11(2):45–57

    Google Scholar 

  16. Friend G (2009) The Truth about Green Business, 1st edn. Pearson Education, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freitas H, Jenkins M, Oliveira M, Popjoy O (1998) The Focus Group, a qualitative research method. ISRC, Merrick School of Business, University of Baltimore (MD, EUA)

  18. Garzón MA, Fisher AL (2008) Modelo teórico de aprendizaje organizacional. Pensamiento & Gestión. Redalyc 24:195–224

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gillis A, Jackson W (2002) Research for nurses: methods and interpretation. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ha TM, Bosch OJ, Nguyen NC (2016) Practical contributions of the systems-based evolutionary learning laboratory to knowledge and stakeholder management. Syst Pract Action Res 29:261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansson T (2006) Workplace logics, kinds of knowledge and action research. Syst Pract Action Res 19:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hara K, Kumazawa T, Kimura M, Tsuda K (2016) Participatory approach in vision setting: emerging initiatives in local municipalities in Japan. Sustain Sci 11:493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs S (2016) The use of participatory action research within education-benefits to stakeholders. World Journal of Education 6(3):48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (2007) Participatory action research: communicative action and the public sphere. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 271–330

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim DH (1993) The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Manag Rev

  26. Kofman F (1992) Lecture slides. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li M (2002) Fostering design culture through cultivating the user-Designer’s design thinking and systems thinking. Syst Pract Action Res 15(5):385–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. MacDonald C (2012) Understanding participatory action research: a qualitative research methodology option. Canadian Journal of Action Research 13(2):34–50

    Google Scholar 

  29. March J, Olsen J (1975) The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur J Polit Res:147–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marshall C, Rossman G (2006) Designing qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miller TR, Wick A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2013) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Narayan D (2002) Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Sourcebook. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. Retrieved May 15, 2018 from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15239 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO

  33. Network of Community Exchange Systems in Asia, Africa & Latin America (2002) Retrieved february 10, 2018, from http://appropriate-economics.org/materials/Community_Exchange_Systems_screen.pdf

  34. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pardo C, Alfonso W (2015) Analysis of the primary causes of business failure in Colombia. Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D.C.

  36. Park P (1993) What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. Participatory Research in the United States and Canada, Voices of Change

    Google Scholar 

  37. Prange C (1999) Organizational learning - desperately seeking theory? In: Easterby-Smith M, Burgoyne J, Araujo L (eds) Organizational learning and the learning organisation. Sage, London, pp 23–43

    Google Scholar 

  38. Singh P (2010) Intercultural communication using an action research approach. Syst Pract Action Res 23:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith SE (2003) What is green business? Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-green-business.htm

  40. Smith EE, Perks S (2010) A perceptual study of the impact of green practice implementation on the business functions. Southern African Business Review 14(3):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  41. Styhre A, Sundgren M (2005) Action research as experimentation. Syst Pract Action Res 18(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. United Nations (2013) World Economic and Social Survey 2013

  43. United Nations (2014) Más de la mitad de la población vive en áreas urbanas y seguirá creciendo. Obtenido de Naciones Unidas. Retrieved November 30, 2018 from http://www.un.org/es/development/desa/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects-2014.html

  44. Uribe D (2018) What is Going on with Stakeholders Theory in Project Management Literature? 1–23. Sustainability (Switzerland)

  45. Varela R, Moreno J, Bedoya M (2015) GEM Colombia 2006–2013. Universidad Icesi, Santiago de Cali

  46. Vargas Z (2009) La investigación aplicada: una forma de conocer las realidades con evidencia científica. Revista Educación. Redalyc 33(1):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Libia Alejandra Navas Castaño.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramírez, M.C., Navas Castaño, L.A., Delgado, Á. et al. Promoting Entrepreneurship through a Community Learning Model – Case Study: Green Businesses. Syst Pract Action Res 32, 629–643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-019-9477-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Green businesses
  • Organizational learning
  • Green entrepreneurship
  • Guavio region Colombia
  • Engineers without Borders Colombia