This paper explores Checkland’s Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) through the lenses of a theoretical framework that incorporates key concepts from Maturana’s Ontology of the Observer (OoO) with the view of complementing Checkland’s SSM application process. We outline and examine paradigmatic compatibility between: Checkland’s ontological position (reality is problematic/chaotic) together with his interpretivist epistemology (multiple perceptions enrich the ever-changing reality); and Maturana’s OoO (we are immersed in the praxis of living in an ontological multi-universe). We argue that OoO resonates with key SSM theoretical underpinnings. After establishing compatibility between these two influential systems thinkers, we advance a conceptual framework in which Checkland’s SSM learning process is re-visited through a the framework grounded on Maturana’s OoO. The proposed framework illustrates how key ideas drawn from Maturana’s OoO can shed light into the way in which some of the main SSM devices (i.e.: Root definitions, Conceptual model) are used in the SSM process. By doing that, SSM is enriched and becomes more flexible as the stakeholders involved are placed within the domain of constitutive ontologies from which, a deeper dialogue can be promoted in a domain of coexistence in mutual acceptance. We argue that this is a suitable way to have more flexible and holistic views for a SSM intervention in particular to promote the learning process and debating proposed changes amongst the stakeholders involved. The proposed framework, when applied, may enhance the power of SSM learning process and when adopted can have substantial implications to complement the SSM process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Ackoff R (1979) The future of OR is past. J Oper Res Soc 30:93–104
Ackoff R (1981) Creating the corporate future. Wiley, New York
Ackoff R (1993) The art and science of mess management. In: Mabey C, Mayon-White B (eds) Managing Change. Paul Chapman Publishing, London
Brocklesby J (1995) Using SSM to identify competence requirements in HRM. Int J Manpow 16(5–6):70
Brocklesby J. (1997) Becoming multi-methodology literate: an assessment of the cognitive difficulties of working across paradigms in Multimethodology, Mingers and Gill (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
Brocklesby J (2007) The theoretical underpinnings of soft systems methodology-comparing the work of Geoffrey Vickers and Humberto Maturana. Syst Res Behav Sci 24(2):157–169
Burrel G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and Organisational analysis. Heinemann Educational Books
Checkland PB (1972) Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. J Syst Eng 3:87–118
Checkland PB (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley
Checkland PB (2005) Webs of significance: the work of Geoffrey Vickers. Syst Res Behav Sci 22:285–290
Checkland and Scholes (1999) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley
Checkland P, Tsouvalis C (1997) Reflecting on SSM: the link between root definitions and conceptual models. Syst Res Behav Sci 14(3):153–168
Churchman W (1971) The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization. Basic Books
Jackson M (1982) The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland. J Appl Syst Anal 9:17
Jackson MC (1991) Systems methodology for the management sciences. Plenum press, New York
Jackson, M. C. (1997), Pluralism in systems thinking and practice, in Multimethodology, Mingers and Gill (eds.), Wiley
Jackson MC (1999) Towards coherent pluralism in management science. J Oper Res Soc 50:12–22
Jackson MC (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, London
Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: holism for managers. Chichester, Wiley
Mason R, Mitroff I (1981) Challenging strategic planning assumptions. Wiley, New York
Maturana H (1988a) Reality: the search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Ir J Psychol 9:25–82 Available at: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/papers/maturana/88-reality.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2019
Maturana, H. (1988b). Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Donaldson R.E. (ed.) Texts in cybernetic theory: An in-depth exploration of the thought of Humberto Maturana, William T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld. American Society for Cybernetics (ASC) conference workbook. Available at: http://ada.evergreen.edu/~arunc/texts/cybernetics/oo/oo3.pdf. 17 Jun 2019
Maturana H (1997) La Objetividad: Un argumento para obligar. Dolmen Ediciones. Santiago de Chile
Maturana H. and Bunnell P. (1997) What is wisdom and how is it learned? Paper presented in abridged form at the north American Association for Environmental Educators conference, July 1997.ƒƒ Available at: https://issuu.com/gfbertini/docs/what_is_wisdom_and_how_is_it_learned. Accessed 27 Apr 2019
Maturana H, Varela F (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living, Reidel: Dordrecht
Maturana H, Varela F (1987) The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, Boston and London
Mingers J (1980) Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology. J Appl Syst Anal 7:41–49
Mingers J (1984) Subjectivism and soft systems methodology-a critique. J Appl Syst Anal 11:85
Mingers (1995) Self-producing systems: implications and applications of autopoiesis. Plenum Press, New York
Mingers, J., (1997a) Multi-paradigm Multimethodology, in Multimethodology, Mingers and Gill (eds.), Wiley
Mingers, J., (1997b), Towards critical pluralism, in Multimethodology, Mingers and Gill (eds.), Wiley
Munro I, Mingers J (2002) The use of multimethodology in practice-results of a survey of practitioners. J Oper Res Soc 59(4):369–378
Paucar-Caceres, A. and Jerardino-Wiesenborn, B. (2019): A bridge for two views: Checkland’s soft systems methodology and Maturana’s ontology of the observer, J Oper Res Soc, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1578629
Paucar-Caceres A, Rodriguez-Ulloa R (2007) An application of soft system dynamics methodology (SSDM)’. J Oper Res Soc 58:701–713 June 2007
Reynolds M (2004) Churchman and Maturana: enriching the notion of self-Organization for Social Design. Syst Pract Action Res 17(6):539–556
Simon H (1947) Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organisation. Free Press
Simon H (1960) The new science of management decision. Harper
We wish to express our gratitude to ELAPDIS (Escuela Latinoamericana de Pensamiento y Diseño Sistémico (Latin American School of Systems Thinking and Design) as the school provided the space to discuss an initial draft of this paper (www.elapdis.org Puerto Montt, Chile 2018 and Huancayo, Peru 2017).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Jerardino-Wiesenborn, B., Paucar-Caceres, A. & Ochoa-Arias, A. A Conceptual Framework Based on Maturana’s Ontology of the Observer to Explore the Checkland’s Soft Systems Methodology. Syst Pract Action Res 33, 579–597 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-019-09502-y
- Problem structuring
- Systemic learning
- Soft systems methodology
- Ontology of the observer