Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Systemic Indicators for Rural Communities in Developing Economies: Bringing the Shared Vision into Being

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community indicators have been a frequent focus of the scholarly literature. There has been little exploration, however, in relation to rural communities, especially in developing countries. This reflects the special challenges associated with the complexity of rural systems, and the difficulties involved in developing appropriate and systemic indicators for rural communities. Identifying indicators that help the community to monitor progress towards sustainable outcomes requires a framework that is both practical and holistic. This paper introduces a participatory systemic framework for identifying community indicators, which respects the principles of complexity and honours the sense of ownership present in the communities. This framework is an iterative, sharing, co-learning engagement process that extends from creating a shared vision and extracting its core messages, to identifying indicators of progress and determining what actions to try. Importantly, this framework enables us to rank the indicators identified by communities with reference to ‘leverage points’, the best places to intervene in the social-environmental system for transformational change. This framework provides a potential pathway for sustainable rural development and perhaps also for organisations and urban communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams D, Wiseman J (2003) Navigating the future: a case study of growing Victoria together. Aust J Public Adm 62:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adisa RS (2012) Rural development in the twenty-first century as a global necessity. In: Adisa RS (ed) Rural development- contemporary issues and practices. InTech, Croatia, pp 3–13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri A, Hjorth P (2007) Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustain Dev 15:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton J, Emery M, Flood RL, Selsky JW, Wolstenholme E (2004) A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives. Syst Pract Action Res 17:3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Morse S (2005) Delivering sustainability therapy in sustainable development projects. J Environ Manag 75:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besleme K, Maser E, Silverstein J (1999) A community indicators case study: addressing the quality of life in two communities. Redefining Progress San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Besleme K, Mullin M (1997) Community indicators and healthy communities. Natl Civ Rev 86:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarini R (2011) Measuring well-being and progress- The OECD better life initiative. The statistics Newsletter-OECD 52:3–4

  • Bosch O, Nguyen NC, Ha TM, Banson KE (2014) Using a systemic approach to improve the quality of life for women in small-scale agriculture: empirical evidence from Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Dominici G (ed) Advances in Business Management. Towards Systemic Approach. 3rd Business systems Laboratory International Symposium, Italy. B.S.LAB, pp 273–278

  • Bridger JC, Luloff AE (1999) Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development. J Rural Stud 15:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1983) Rural development: putting the last first. Routledge- Taylor & Francis Group, London

  • Chambers R (1995) Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? Environ Urban 7:173–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (2012) Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? In: jolly R (ed) milestones and turning points in development thinking. Springer, pp 101-117

  • Cobb CW, Rixford C (1998) Lessons learned from the history of social indicators. Redefining Progress, San Francisco

  • Cobbinah PB, Erdiaw-Kwasie MO, Amoateng P (2015) Rethinking sustainable development within the framework of poverty and urbanisation in developing countries. Environ Dev 13:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox D, Frere M, West S, Wiseman J (2010) Developing and using local community wellbeing indicators: learning from the experience of community indicators Victoria. Aust J Soc Issues 45:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daams MN, Veneri P (2016) Living near to attractive nature? A well-being indicator for ranking Dutch, Danish, and German functional urban areas. Soc Indic Res. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1375-5

  • Daly HE (1973) Toward a steady-state economy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Dluhy M, Swartz N (2006) Connecting knowledge and policy: the promise of community indicators in the United States. Soc Indic Res 79:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexhage J, Murphy D (2010) Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), United Nations Headquarters, New York

  • Duran DC, Artene A, Gogan LM, Duran V (2015) The objectives of sustainable development-ways to achieve welfare. Procedia Economics and Finance 26:812–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley J, Costanza R (2002) Envisioning shared goals for humanity: a detailed, shared vision of a sustainable and desirable USA in 2100. Ecol Econ 43:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (2010) The relationship of ‘systems thinking’to action research. Syst Pract Action Res 23:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahin R, Paterson C (2001) Community indicators: past, present, and future. Natl Civ Rev 90:347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahin R, Veleva V, Hart M (2003) Do indicators help create sustainable communities? Local Environ 8:661–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guijt I, Woodhill J (2002) Managing for impact in rural development: a guide for project M&E International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Rome, Italy

  • Ha TM, Bosch OJ, Nguyen NC (2016) Establishing an Evolutionary learning Laboratory for Improving the quality of life of Vietnamese women in small-scale agriculture: part II–systemic interventions. Syst Res Behav Sci 33:341–359. doi:10.1002/sres.2349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha TM, Bosch OJH, Nguyen NC (2014) Applying an Evolutionary learning laboratory approach for improving the quality of life for women smallholders in the Red River Delta of Vietnam. Paper presented at the European meetings on cybernetics and systems Reseach, Vienna, Austria, 21-25 April 2014

  • Hamalainen RP, Saarinen E (2008) Systems intelligence-the way forward? A note on Ackoff's' why few organizations adopt systems thinking. Syst Res Behav Sci 25:821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haworth J, Hart G (2007) Introduction. In: Haworth J, Hart G (eds) Well-being-individual, community and social perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 1–24

  • Hjorth P, Madani K (2014) Sustainability monitoring and assessment: new challenges require new thinking. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140:133–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston D (2008) Systemic intervention in a university department: reflections on arrested action research. Syst Pract Action Res 21:133–152

  • Innes JE, Booher DE (2000) Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Plan Theory Pract 1:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishwaran N, Persic A, Tri NH (2008) Concept and practice: the case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 7:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The social psychology of organizations, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • King C, Gunton J, Freebairn D, Coutts J, Webb I (2000) The sustainability indicator industry: where to from here? A focus group study to explore the potential of farmer participation in the development of indicators. Anim Prod Sci 40:631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis C (2000) Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Dev Chang 31:931–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao P-s (2009) Parallels between objective indicators and subjective perceptions of quality of life: a study of metropolitan and county areas in Taiwan. Soc Indic Res 91:99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maani K (2013) Decision-making for climate change adaptation: a systems thinking approach. The National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Maani KE (2002) Consensus building through systems thinking: the case of policy and planning in healthcare. Australas J Inf Sys 9:84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Massingham P (2014) The researcher as change agent. Syst Pract Action Res 27:417–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathbor GM (2008) Understanding community participation. In: Effective community participation in coastal development. Lyceum Books Inc., U.S., Chicago, United States, pp 7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef M (1992) Development and human needs. In: Ekins P, Max-Neef M (eds) Real-life economics: understanding wealth creation. Routledge, London, pp 197–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development: a report to the Ballaton group. The Sustainability Institute, Hartland Four Corners, VT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1999) Leverage points- places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute, Hartland VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (2002) Dancing with systems. Systems Thinker 13:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, USA

  • Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D (2004) Limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsea Green Publishing, UK

  • Memon A, Johnston K (2008) Institutional barriers to developing community indicators in New Zealand: a preliminary assessment. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance 1:70–79

  • Mitleton-Kelly E (2003) Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. Elsevier, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton A, Edwards L (2013) Community wellbeing indicators: measures for local government. Australian Centre for Excellence in Local Government and Local Government, University of Technology, Sydney

  • Nguyen N, Bosch O (2013) A systems thinking approach to identify leverage points for sustainability: a case study in the cat Ba biosphere reserve, Vietnam. Syst Res Behav Sci 30:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll HH (2002) Towards a European system of social indicators: theoretical framework and system architecture. Soc Indic Res 58:47–87

  • Norris T (2006) Introduction from the community indicators handbook http://www.tylernorris.com/pubs/indicats.html. Accessed 28 Oct 2015

  • OECD (2011) Compendium of OECD well-being indicators. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/std/47917288.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2016

  • OECD (2015) Measuring well-being and progress: well-being research. OECD. http://www.Oecd.Org/Statistics/Measuring-well-being-and-progress.Htm. Accessed 5 Jannuary 2016

  • Phillips R (2003) Community indicators. American Planning Association, Chicago

  • Progress Redefining, Network Earth Day (2002) Sustainability starts in your community: a community indicators guide. Redefining Progress, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley M (2003) Quality of life research: a critical introduction. Sage, Los Angeles

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Redefining Progress, Tyler Norris Associates, Sustainable Seattle (1997) The community indicators handbook: measuring progress toward healthy and sustainable communities. Redefining Progress, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS, Fraser ED, Dougill AJ (2006) An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecol Econ 59:406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley J (2001) Multidisciplinary indicators of impact and change: key issues for identification and summary. Agric Ecosyst Environ 87:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseland M (2000) Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Prog Plan 54:73–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen E, Hämäläinen RP (2007) Systems intelligence: connecting engineering thinking with human sensitivity. Systems intelligence in leadership and everyday life:51–78

  • Sawicki DS, Flynn P (1996) Neighborhood indicators: a review of the literature and an assessment of conceptual and methodological issues. J Am Plan Assoc 62:165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (2006) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy MJ, Phillips R, Rahtz DR (2013) Community quality-of-life indicators: best cases VI vol 4. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1995) An almost practical step toward sustainability. Ekistics 62:15

    Google Scholar 

  • Stain DS, Imel S (2002) Adult learning in community. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers DM et al (2015) Simple models for managing complex social–ecological systems: the landscape Futures analysis tool (LFAT). Environ Model Softw 63:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain D, Hollar D (2003) Measuring progress: community indicators and the quality of life. Int J Public Adm 26:789–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzi F, Türkoğlu HD, Bölen F, Baran PK, Salihoğlu T (2015) Residents’ perception of cultural activities as quality of life in Istanbul. Soc Indic Res 122:211–234

  • Thomas E, Amadei B (2010) Accounting for human behavior, local conditions and organizational constraints in humanitarian development models. Environ Dev Sustain 12:313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE (2013) Conference of European statisticians endorses recommendations to assist countries in measuring sustainable development. UNECE. http://www.Unece.Org/index.Php?Id=33019. Accessed 5 Jannuary 2016

  • van der Helm R (2009) The vision phenomenon: towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning. Futures 41:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff L (2014) Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach. Sustaib Sci 9:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells S, McLean J (2013) One way forward to beat the Newtonian habit with a complexity perspective on organisational change. Syst 1:66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley MJ (2006) Leadership and the new science: discovering order in a chaotic world. Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc., San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  • White S, Pettit J (2004) Participatory approaches and the measurement of human well-being Wellbeing in Developing Countries ESRC Research Group, UK

  • Whiteman G, Walker B, Perego P (2013) Planetary boundaries: ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. J Manag Stud 50:307–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (2010) Systems thinking and capacity building in the international arena. In: Fujita N (ed) Beyond logframe; using systems concepts in evaluation. FASiD, Tokyo, Japan, pp 35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Work Group for Community Health and Development (2015) The community tool box. The University of Kansas. http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluate-commutanity-initiatives/examples-of-community-level-indicators/main. Accessed 13 January 2016

  • Zaccai E (2012) Over two decades in pursuit of sustainable development: influence, transformations, limits. Environ Dev 1:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler W (1991) Envisioning the future. Futures 23:516–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marketing and Management, The University of Adelaide Business School, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005

    Phuong T. Nguyen & Sam Wells

  2. College of Forestry, Vietnam National University of Forestry, Chuong My District, Ha Noi, Vietnam

    Phuong T. Nguyen

Authors
  1. Phuong T. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sam Wells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phuong T. Nguyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, P.T., Wells, S. Systemic Indicators for Rural Communities in Developing Economies: Bringing the Shared Vision into Being. Syst Pract Action Res 31, 159–177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9421-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9421-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation