Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 67–77 | Cite as

Rich Picture: The Role of the Facilitator

Original Paper

Abstract

Information Systems for complex situations often fail to adequately deliver quality and suitability. One reason for this failure is an inability to identify comprehensive user requirements. Seldom do all stakeholders, especially those ‘invisible’ or ‘back room’ system users, have a voice when systems are designed. To improve upon this, system designers use rich pictures (RPs) as a diagrammatic means of identifying differing world views with the aim of creating shared understanding of the organisation. RPs have predominantly been used as freeform, unstructured tools with no commonly agreed syntax. This paper focuses only on the early stages of RP facilitation and is part of a large scale research project involving analysis on a substantial collection of RPs. Although facilitation is well documented in other domains there is a dearth of information and advice within academic literature on how to facilitate RP collaborative group drawing exercises. Thus, three styles of RP facilitation are presented showing how facilitator instruction and approach to delivery affects the initial picturing process and outcome. Results, suggest that the method one takes when instigating RP group work has profound influences on the group behaviour and the resulting RPs. From the researchers point of view it is hoped that this paper might act as a catalyst for debate concerning the role of the facilitator in collaborative diagramming.

Keywords

Rich picture Facilitation Workshop Best practice Practitioner 

References

  1. Armson R (2011) Growing wings on the way. Triarchy Press, AxminsterGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell S, Morse S (2010) Rich pictures: a means to explore the ‘Sustainable Group Mind’. Sustain Dev 21(1):30–47Google Scholar
  3. Bell S, Morse S (2012a) Resilient Participation: saving the human planet. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell S, Morse S (2012b) How people use rich pictures to help them think. Syst Pract Action Res 26(4):331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell S, Morse S (2013) Towards an understanding of how policy making groups use indicators. Ecol Indic 35:13–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg T, Pooley R (2012a) Contemporary iconography for rich picture construction. Syst Res Behav Sci 30(1):31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg T, Pooley R (2012b) Rich pictures: collaborative communication through icons. Syst Pract Action Res 26(4):361–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg T, Pooley R (2012c) Rich Pictures: a valuable means to explore complex IS issues. In: 17 International UK Academy of Information Systems. AIS Online Library, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronte-Stewart M (1999) Regarding rich pictures as tools for communication in information systems development. Comput Inf Syst 6:83–103Google Scholar
  10. Cameron E (2005) Facilitation made easy: practical tips to improve meetings and workshops. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao R, Chuah K, Chau Y, Law M (2012) The role of facilitators in project action learning implementation. Learn Organ 19(5):414–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Conradin K, Kropac M, Spuhler D (2010) The SSWM toolbox. Seecon International GMBH, Basel. http://www.sswm.info/category/planning-process-tools/exploring/exploring-tools/preliminary-assessment-current-status/rich. Accessed 17 Dec 2012 from Sustainable Sanitation and Water Management toolbox
  14. Gray D, Brown S, Macanufo J (2010) Gamestorming. O’Reilly Media, Inc., SebastopolGoogle Scholar
  15. Heron J (1999) Complete facilitator’s handbook. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Isaacs W (1999) Dialogue and the art of thinking together. Doubleday Garden City, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Monk A, Howard S (1998) The Rich Picture: a tool for reasoning about work content. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~wscacchi/Software-Process/Readings/RichPicture.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013
  18. Open-University (2009) Systems thinking and practise. http://systems.open.ac.uk/materials/T552/. Accessed 30 Nov 2013 from T552
  19. Roam D (2009) The back of the Napkin. Marshall Cavendish Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Sandker M, Campbell B, Perez M, Sayer J, Cowling R, Kassa H et al (2010) The role of Participatory Modeling in landscape approaches to Reconcile Conservation and Development. Ecol Soc 15(2):13Google Scholar
  21. Scholz G, Dewulf A, Pahl-Wostl C (2013) An Analytical Framework of Social Learning facilitated by participatory methods. Syst Pract Action Res. doi:10.1007/s11213-013-9310-z Google Scholar
  22. Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline. Currency Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsai W, Shaw M, Fan Y, Liu J, Lee K (2011) An empirical investigation of the impacts of internal/external facilitators on the project success of ERP: a structural equation model. Decis Support Syst 50:480–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceHeriotWatt UniversityEdinburghScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations