Skip to main content
Log in

Decoding the Japanese Lean Production System According to a Viable Systems Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increase in the complexity and variability of the business environment, due to constant and rapid changes in markets, calls for more flexible and effective production systems. Of the most valuable production systems, the Japanese lean production system (LPS) is the best known and studied, but is still not the most widely applied with success outside Japan. The reason for the low level of success of lean production outside its native country is the lack of understanding of the strong interactions which hold between enterprises and business systems. In order to fill this gap in our knowledge, we investigate the systemic interactions according to the viable system view. To develop our analysis, we combine the elements of two of the major viable systems theories: the Viable System Model (VSM) of Stafford Beer, and the Viable System Approach (VSA) of Gaetano Golinelli. We combine these two perspectives to create a cohesive framework that combines the internal structural analysis of VSM with the analysis of links to the environmental suprasystems of VSA. In line with this framework, we examine the peculiar aspects of the Japanese LPS in order to find the relevant correspondences between the Japanese LPS and the Viable Systems perspective. We portray the peculiarities of the lean production system, shedding light on its roots in the Japanese business environment (Dominici 2008, 2010), and we show how it has worked as an incubator to create those managerial practices that represent the LPS. We also show how the Japanese kaisha can be effectively represented as a viable system in homeostatic interaction with the Japanese business environment. We conclude with an analysis of the results and summary of the possibilities for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby WR (1956) Introduction to cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1958) Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1(2):83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1960) Design for a brain: the origin of adaptive behaviour. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1964) The set theory of mechanism and homeostasis. In: von Bertalanffy L, Rapoport A (eds) General systems: yearbook of the society for general systems research, vol 1. Society for General Systems Research, Ann Arbor, pp 83–97

  • Azadeh A, Darivandi K, Fathi E (2012) Diagnosing, simulating and improving business process using cybernetic laws and the Viable System Model: the case of a purchasing process. Syst Res Behav Sci 29:66–86. doi:10.1002/sres.1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barile S (2009) Management sistemico vitale. Giappichelli, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1959) Cybernetics and management. English University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1966) Decision and control. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1972) Brain of the firm. The Penguin Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the system for organizations. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1989) National government: disseminated regulation in real time or ‘How to run a country’. In: Espejo R, Harnden R (eds) The Viable System Model: interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher WF (2007) Holistic management: managing what matters for company success. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby P (1979) Quality is free. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominici G (2008) Holonic production system to obtain flexibility for customer satisfaction. J Serv Sci Manage 1:251–254. doi:10.4236/ib.2010.23025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominici G (2010) From business system to supply chain and production in Japan. Verlag Dr. Muller, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominici G, Pitasi A (2012) Reframing the systemic approach to complex organizations as intangible portfolios. Nuova Atlantide 1:33–52. doi:10.4399/97888548485135

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominici G, Argoneto P, Renna P, Cuccia L (2010) The Holonic production system: a multi agent simulation approach. iBusiness 2:201–209. doi:10.4236/ib.2010.23025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Harnden RJ (1989) The Viable System Model. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Kuropatwa D (2011) Appreciating the complexity of organizational processes. Kybernetes 40(3):454–476. doi:10.1108/03684921111133683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Reyes A (2011) Organizational systems: managing complexity with the Viable System Model. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinelli GM (2010) Viable Systems Approach (VSA). Cedam, Padua

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiko L (1991) The Conceptual Foundations of Just-In-Time. In: Satir A Proceedings of the International Conference on Just-in-Time Manufacturing Systems: Operational Planning and Control Issues

  • Hoshi T, Kashyap A, Scharfstein D (1990) The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan. J Financ Econ 27(1):67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson JK, Nonaka I (1996) Relentless, the Japanese way of marketing. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard A (2006) Walking the line: making and dissolving distinctions with the Viable System Model and team syntegrity. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, ISSS 2006 Papers. http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings50th/article/view/307/182

  • Leonard A (2009) The Viable System Model and its application to complex organizations. Syst Pract Action Res 22:223–233. doi:10.1007/s11213-009-9126-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1975) Autopoietic systems. BLC Report 9. University of Illinois, Urbana

  • McCulloch WS (1965) Embodiments of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Monden Y (1998) Toyota Production System: An integrated approach to Just-In-Time. Engineering & Management Press, Norcross

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D (1980) Rapporti di Classe nell’America del Primo ‘900. Rosemberg & Sellier, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann R, Ramirez R (2008) Designing interactive strategy: from value chain to value constellation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae K (1982) The mind of the strategist, the art of Japanese business. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto DI, Rohlen TP (1988) Inside the Japanese system: readings on contemporary society and political economy. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering A (2002) Cybernetics and the Mangle. Ashby, Beer and Pask. Soc Stud Sci 32:413–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1965) Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack J, Jones D, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gandolfo Dominici.

Additional information

To conform with Italian regulations on academic publishing, we attribute the contribution of each author as follows, even though the article is the joint work of both authors: Gandolfo Dominici, sections: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7–Federica Palumbo, sections: 5, 6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dominici, G., Palumbo, F. Decoding the Japanese Lean Production System According to a Viable Systems Perspective. Syst Pract Action Res 26, 153–171 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9242-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9242-z

Keywords

Navigation