Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating Climate Change Discourse in New Zealand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Issues of social responsibility, ethics and interdependence, as well as the pragmatic imperative to better understand complexity, require that diverse viewpoints be invited and given credence by policy makers seeking imaginative ‘solutions’ to climate change. This paper explores the statutory introduction of biofuels into New Zealand by way of the discourses that preceded this decision. This inquiry used Critically Systemic Thinking and ‘Mode 2’ Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) to engage with multiple stakeholders to the Biofuels policy to discover how the discourse was conducted. It concludes that the process of policymaking was framed in technical rationalist terms thereby favouring certain ‘worldviews’ over others. Accordingly, a model of ‘ideal’ discourse and decision making for governing the conduct of future public discourse is presented. This inquiry assists in re-establishing SSM as a rigorous and reflexive approach to analysing a complex issue and for enhancing collective learning into its content and process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ackoff RL (1999) A lifetime of systems thinking [Electronic version]. Syst Thinker Build Shared Underst 10(5):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön DA (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnden AW, Darke P (2000) A comparison of SSM with an organisational learning model. Paper presented at the 1st international conference on systems thinking in management, Geelong, Australia

  • Bohm D (1996) On dialogue. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee G (2009) Opening address to the 2009 EECA: biofuels in New Zealand—Where to from here? Retrieved 10 January 2010, from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/biofuels+where+here

  • Capra F (1988) The turning point: science, society and the rising culture. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers S (1995) Discourse and democratic practices. In: White SK (ed) The Cambridge companion to habermas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles MB, Ryan R, Ryan N, Oloruntoba R (2007) Public policy and biofuels: the way forward? Energy Policy 35:5737–5746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Howell S (1998) Information, systems and information systems—making sense of the field. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J (1989) SSM in action. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz SA (1992) Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: developments in communication and politics of everyday life. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin B (1996) Given a context by any other name: methodological tools for taming the unruly beast (Keynote paper). Paper presented at the ISIC 96: information seeking in context 1–23

  • FAO Economic and Social Department (2007) Crop prospects and food situation—No. 3: food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO)

  • EECA (2007) EECA’s transport programmes. Retrieved 25 February, 2008, from http://www.eeca.govt.nz/transport/indexnew.html

  • Flood RL (2001) The relationship of ‘Systems Thinking’ to action research. In: Reason PBH (ed) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice (pp xlii, 468p). Sage Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Romm RA (eds) (1997) Critical systems thinking: current research and practice. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi J (1999) Systems thinking: managing chaos and complexity: a platform for designing business architecture. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold J (2001) Storying systems: managing everyday flux using Mode 2 Soft Systems Methodology. Syst Pract Action Res 14(5):557–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action, vols I and II. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1986) Knowledge and human interests (trans: Shapiro J). Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1989) The theory of communicative action: a critique of functionalist reason (trans: McCarthy T, vol I & II). Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1990) Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In: Benhabib S, Dallmayr F (eds) The communicative ethics controversy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2000) The inclusion of the other studies in political theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs W (1999) Dialogue and the art of thinking together. Doubleday/Currency, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (2001) Critical systems thinking and practice. Eur J Oper Res 128:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH (1995) Vision deployment matrix: a framework for large-scale change. Syst Thinker Build Shared Underst 6(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledington PWJ, Ledington J (2007) SSM in facilitating healthy discourse among stakeholders in the community. Pers Commun 16(4), Electronic message

  • Maturana H, Varela F (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidl, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1989) An introduction to autopoiesis–implications and applications. Syst Pract 2:159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Transport (2006) Biofuels sales obligation: a discussion paper on proposed policy. Retrieved from http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/MultipageDocumentPage_39056.aspx

  • Morgan G (1997) Images of organization, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby DK (1988) Communication and power in organisations: discourse, ideology and domination. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose J (1997) Soft systems methodology as a social science research tool. Syst Res Behav Sci 14(4):249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose J, Haynes M (1999) A soft systems approach to the evaluation of complex interventions in the public sector. J Appl Manage Stud 8(2):199–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman B, Merry A, Walton M (2007) Safety and ethics in healthcare: a guide to getting it right. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art & practice of the learning organization, 1st edn. Doubleday, New York

  • Stacey RD (2007) Strategic management and organisational dynamics: the challenge of complexity, 5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Pract 1(2):247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2007) Sustainable energy: a framework for decision makers

  • Walker S, Archer D, Brown D, Good R, Hoather L, Honeybone P et al (2004) SPEaR good practice guidelines package. The Social Policy Evaluation and Research committee (SPEaR), Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren ME (1995) The self in discursive democracy. In: White SK (ed) The Cambridge companion to habermas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • White SK (1995) The Cambridge companion to Habermas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute (2006) Biofuels for transport: global potential and implications for energy and agriculture. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

    Terry Nolan & Peter Crowe

Authors
  1. Terry Nolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Crowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Nolan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolan, T., Crowe, P. Evaluating Climate Change Discourse in New Zealand. Syst Pract Action Res 23, 405–418 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9166-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9166-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation