Skip to main content

Quality in Action Research: Reflections for Second-Order Inquiry

Systemic Practice and Action Research volume 22, pages 383–396 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

One of the current debates in action research concerns the quality of these practices. Up to now, many contributions have focused on defining specific criteria based on action research epistemology. This article sustains (1) that prior to dealing with these questions, it is necessary to define for what purpose and for whom we are making the evaluation; (2) that this leads us to make a distinction between different evaluation models; and (3) that the quality strategies and criteria will be different for each model. In particular, the article confronts an academic evaluation model as a form of external control over the quality of action research and an internal, participatory evaluation model as a quality strategy aimed at establishing feedback for the process. Final considerations are given about the implications of both models for academia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Anderson GL, Herr K, Nihlen AS (1994) Studying your own school: an educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison D, Baskerville R, Myers M (2001) Controlling action research projects. Inform Tech People 14(1):28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury H, Reason P (2001) Conclusion: broadening the bandwidth of validity: issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) Handbook of action research: participatory inquiry and practice. Sage, London, pp 447–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In: Gage NL (ed) Handbook of research on teaching. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 171–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellà C, Jorba L (2005) Evaluación de las experiencias participativas en la gestión local de Cataluña: potencialidades y amenazas. Gestión y análisis de políticas publicas 32:79–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion D, Stowell F (2003) Validating action research field studies: PEArL. Syst Pract Act Res 16(1):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler D, Torbert B (2003) Transforming inquiry and action by interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Res 1(2):133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Act Res 11(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith M, Lytle S (1993) Inside/outside: teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins JB, Earl LM (1995) Participatory evaluation in education: studies of evaluation use and organizational learning. Falmer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1941) Propositions, warranted assertibility and truth. J Philos 38(7):169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot J (1991) Action research for educational change. Open University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda O (1994) El problema de cómo investigar la realidad para transformarla por la praxis, Tercer Mundo, Bogotá

  • Fals Borda O (2001) Participatory (action) research in social theory: origins and challenges. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman A (2007) Validity and quality in action research. Educ Action Res 15(1):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman DM (2001) Foundation of empowerment evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ (2007) Teaching/learning action research requires fundamental reforms in public higher education. Action Res 5(3):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ, Levin M (1998) Introduction to action research: social research for social change. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1981) Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen HLT, Huttunen R, Syrjälä L (2007) Action research as narrative: five principles for validation. Educ Action Res 15(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron J (1996a) Quality as primacy of the practical. Qual Inq 2(1):41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron J (1996b) Co-operative inquiry: research into the human condition. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr K, Anderson GL (2005) The action research dissertation: a guide for students and faculty. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope KW, Waterman HA (2003) Praiseworthy pragmatism? Validity and action research. J Adv Nurs 44(2):120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandlbinder P (2004) Reconstructing educational technology: a critical analysis of online teaching and learning in the university. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney

  • Kvale S (1995) The social construction of validity. Qual Inq 1(1):19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapassade G (1971) L’Analyseur et l’Analyste. Gauthiers-Villars, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather P (1986) Issues of validity in openly ideological research: between a rock and a hard place. Interchange 17:63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln Y (1995) Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qual Inq 1(3):275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln Y, Guba E (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Losito B, Pozzo G, Somekh B (1998) Exploring the labyrinth of first and second order inquiry in action research. Educ Action Res 6(2):219–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martí J (2008) From local practices to public knowledge: action research as scientific contribution. Review Essay [online]. Forum Qual Soc Res, 9(2), art. 2. Available at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs080320 (Date of access: 10 November 2008)

  • McTaggart R (1998) Is validity really an issue for participatory action research? Cult Organ 4(2):211–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan RG (2004) Practicing evaluation: a collaborative approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan RG, O’Sullivan JM (1998) Evaluation voices: promoting evaluation from within programs through collaboration. Eval Program Plan 21(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1981) Practical evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P (2006) Choice and quality in action research practice. J Manag Inq 6(15):187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos BS (2002) Para uma sociologia das ausências e uma sociologia das emergências. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 63:237–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos BS (2003) Crítica de la razón indolente. Contra el desperdicio de la experiencia. Desclée de Brouwer, Bilbao

  • Schwandt TA (1996) Farewell to criteriology. Qual Inq 2(1):58–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake R (ed) (1975) Evaluating the arts in education: a responsive approach. Merrill, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake R (1994) Case studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 236–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RB (2002) Judging the quality of participatory action research. Paper presented at ISA Conference, Brisbane

  • Stringer ET (2007) Action research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert WR (2000) Transforming social science: integrating quantitative, qualitative, and action research. In: Sherman F, Torbert WR (eds) Transforming social inquiry, transforming social action. Kluwer, Boston, pp 67–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnock C, Gibson V (2001) Validity in action research: a discussion on theoretical and practice issues encountered whilst using observation to collect data. J Adv Nurs 36(3):471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasante TR (2006) Desbordes creativos, Los Libros de la Catarata, Madrid

  • Villasante TR, Garrido J (2001) Methodologies for the participant construction of knowledge. Syst Pract Act Res 14(4):483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins KE (1991) Validity in action research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, 3–7 April 1991)

  • Zuber-Skerritt O, Fletcher M (2007) The quality of an action research thesis in social sciences. Qual Assur Educ 15(4):413–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain

    Joel Martí

  2. Department of Sociology II, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Madrid, Spain

    Tomás R. Villasante

Authors
  1. Joel Martí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomás R. Villasante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Martí.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martí, J., Villasante, T.R. Quality in Action Research: Reflections for Second-Order Inquiry. Syst Pract Action Res 22, 383–396 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9136-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9136-x

Keywords

  • Quality
  • Validity
  • Evaluation
  • Second-order inquiry