Skip to main content
Log in

Action Research for Sustainable Water Futures in Western Sydney: Reaching Beyond Traditional Stakeholder Engagement to Understand Community Stakeholder Language and Its Implications for Action

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Action on issues of ecological significance often requires changes in personal behaviour and political consensus on technologies to support these changes. Unfortunately, many consultation processes only engage a narrow range of stakeholders, usually those professionally engaged or already active on a range of community issues. This paper illustrates how people who are ‘hard to reach’ or seen as ‘apathetic’ might be engaged using ‘action-conversations’ that explore the social climate for action and how scientific/technical messages can be framed in the language of the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbs D (2002) Climate change in Australia’s coastal communities. CSIRO Atmospheric Research, Aspendale

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) (2007) Science and the public’s perception of water recycling. Ockham’s Razor, ABC Radio National, 20 May 2007. http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2007/1925957.htm. Accessed 8 March 2008

  • Boland A, Hamilton A, Stevens D, Kelly J, Marks J, Nancarrow B, Po M, Wos M, Faggian R, Jarwal S, Engleitner S, Stagnitti F (2005) Use of recycled water in Australian horticulture. In: The proceedings of the Oz water watershed: the turning point for water. Australian Water Association, Australia

  • Booth CA, Burgin S (1997) Integrated catchment management—linking policy, science and the community: a case study from the Upper Parramatta River Catchment, New South Wales (Australia). In: Klomp N, Lunt I (eds) Frontiers in ecology: building the links. Elsevier Science Limited, Oxford, pp 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S (2002) Tragic consequences for conservation of mis-defining the term ‘community’. In: Lunney D, Burgin S (eds) A clash of paradigms: community and research-based conservation. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin S, Maheshwari B, Webb T, Huda S, Packham R, Parvez Q, Wallace G (2007) A systems approach for water use and management in peri-urban landscapes: connecting science and cultural dimensions for sustainability. In: The pipeline’ symposium. Centre for Cultural Research, University of Western Sydney, South Penrith

  • Christen EW, Shepheasrd ML, Meyer WS, Jayawardane NS, Fairweather H (2006) Triple bottom line reporting to promote sustainability of irrigation in Australia. Irrig Drain Syst 20:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEWR (2007) Australia state of the environment. Department of Environment and Water Resources, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Friere P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed (trans: Ramos M). Herder and Herder, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis: emergence vs. forcing basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine De Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser R, Hauser H (1975) Coming of social age. Centre for Human Rights and Responsibilities, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesbury–Nepean River Management Forum (HNRMF) (2004) Water and Sydney’s future—balancing the values of our rivers and economy. Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby B (ed) (1996) Service learning in higher education: concepts and practices. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1988a) The action research reader. Deakin University Press, Deakin Waurn Ponds

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1988b) The action research planner. Deakin University Press, Deakin Waurn Ponds

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunney D, Dickman C, Burgin S (2002) A bizarre and threatening process: bypassing ecological research when tackling environmental issues. In: Lunney D, Dickman C, Burgin S (eds) A clash of paradigms: community and research-based conservation. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 97–101

  • Maheshwari B (2004) Urban irrigation: understanding issues and research needs. In: Proceedings of national workshop on the role of irrigation in urban water conservation—opportunities and challenges. Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures, Toowoomba, pp 15–18

  • Maheshwari BL, Simmons B (2003) Issues, challenges and opportunities for water reuse and management in Sydney, Australia. In: Devi R, Ashan N (eds) Water and wastewater: perspectives of developing countries. Water and environmental management series. IWA Publishing International Water Association, London, pp 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks J (2007) Comments on: Science and the public’s perception of water recycling. Ockham’s Razor, ABC Radio National, 20 May 2007

  • McKay J (2007) An evaluation of the corporative governance arrangements of Australian irrigation water providers. Water 34:150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart R (ed) (1997) Participatory action research: international contexts and consequences. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Peavey F (1994) By life’s grace: musings on the essence of social change. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Peavey F, Hutchinson V (1993) Strategic questioning for personal and social change. Fran Peavey, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittock B (1993) Developing regional climate change scenarios: their reliability and seriousness. In: Burgin S (ed) Climate change: implications for natural resource conservation. University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Occasional Papers in Biological Sciences No 1, pp 3–28

  • Smith A, Maheshwari BL (2002) Options for alternative irrigation water supplies in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia: a case study of the Shepparton Irrigation Region. Agric Water Manage 56:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapp WB, Wals AEJ, Stankorb SL (1996) Environmental education for empowerment: action research and community problem solving. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme GJ, Nancarrow BE (2002) Evaluation of public involvement programs: measuring justice and process criteria. Water 29:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin J, Crawford M (2002) Public artists working with nature in suburban Fairfield. In: Lunney D, Burgin S (eds) Urban wildlife: more than meets the eye. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 186–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CC (2003) Using PhotoVoice as a participatory assessment and issue selection tool: a case study with the homeless in Ann Arbor. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds) Community based participatory research for health. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Burris MA (1997) PhotoVoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav 24:369–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb T (2004a) A popular educator’s toolbox for social change. Centre for Popular Education, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney. http://www.cpe.uts.edu.au/publications/toolbox.html. Accessed 8 March 2008

  • Webb T (2004b) PhotoVoice—as a tool for making visible and heard the voices of people who are invisible in the community. In: A popular educator’s toolbox for social change. Centre for Popular Education, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney. http://www.cpe.uts.edu.au/publications/toolbox.html. Accessed 8 March 2008

  • Webb T (2005) Seeing further, listening harder, and asking questions—developing grassroots leadership for community action. Report on the Warilla Community Leadership development project. Centre for Popular Education, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney. http://www.cpe.uts.edu.au/pdfs/WarillaProject.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2008

  • Webb T (2006) Action conversations: asking strategic questions in conversational style as a ‘tool’ for developing community and social action projects, and the evaluation of these projects. In: A popular educator’s toolbox for social change. Centre for Popular Education, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney. http://www.cpe.uts.edu.au/publications/toolbox.html. Accessed 8 March 2008

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper would not have been possible without significant contributions of the other members of the collaborative group of staff and undergraduate students including: Samsul Huda, Gary Wallace, Qaiyum Parvez, Roger Packham, Sam Lowe, Jen Hens, Tom Calthorpe, Graham Bryson, and Joshua White.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelley Burgin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webb, T., Burgin, S. & Maheshwari, B. Action Research for Sustainable Water Futures in Western Sydney: Reaching Beyond Traditional Stakeholder Engagement to Understand Community Stakeholder Language and Its Implications for Action. Syst Pract Action Res 22, 1–14 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9102-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9102-z

Keywords

Navigation