Skip to main content
Log in

Systemic Approaches to Managing Across the Gap in the Public Sector: Results of an Action Research Programme

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tells the story and conclusions of a 1 year research project which took place over the calendar year of 2006. It was undertaken within a local government authority (or Local Authority—LA) in the UK. The specific research question to be answered was: “Can the application of systems methods in the LA aid Authority staff in developing and enhancing their professional practice?” A supplementary question arising was: “Can such learning be of wider value to other sections of the public sector (for example in other regions of local government or the health sector)?” In the process of the year 91 separate action research interactions took place. The research comes to three systemically linked findings: Firstly, LA middle managers are often caught between two realities ... strategic initiatives and operational demands. In the gap between these two realities they experience change in many guises but most critically in terms of government directives, ICT initiatives and restructuring. Despite this complexity managers did not appear to always have adequate tools to deal with issues arising in their context. Secondly, an assessment matrix developed originally at the Open University is a valuable tool for assessing the systemisism and reflective capacities of staff and, thirdly, a new, blended hybrid training programme to develop systemic reflective practitioners able to manage across the strategy/operations gap was developed and pilot tested in 2007. This programme shows signs of providing enhanced professional practice and, at the time of writing, is being further piloted with a view to establishing its wider applicability within the public sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anessi-Pessina E, Cantu E (2006) Whither managerialism in the Italian national health service? Int J Health Plann Manage 21(4):327–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R, Wood-Harper T (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J Inform Technol 11:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R, Wood-Harper AT (1998) Diversity in information systems action research methods. Eur J Inform Syst 7:90–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S (1998) Self-reflection and vulnerability in action research: bringing forth new worlds in our learning. Syst Pract Act Res 11(2):179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S (1999) Rapid and participatory IS analysis and design: a means to defy the ‘anatomy of confusion’? In: Castell A, Gregory A, Hindle G, James M, Ragsdell G (eds) Synergy matters: working with systems in the 21st century. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 523–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Christina A (2006) Applying systemic project management approaches for the UK national health service. Syst Pract Act Res 19(1):27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Coleman G et al (2000) Information systems project in China: action research and soft systems methodology. Hum Syst Manage 19:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Morse S (2003) Learning from experience in sustainability. The 2003 international sustainable development research conference, University of Nottingham, UK

  • Bell S, Morse S (2007a) Problem structuring methods: theorising the benefits of deconstructing sustainable development projects. J Oper Res Soc 58:576–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Morse S (2007b) Story telling in sustainable development projects. Sustain Dev 15:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Wood-Harper AT (2007) Applying the multiview analysis and design methodology in a non-governmental organisation in Bangladesh. J Global Inform Technol Manage 10(2):7–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottrall A (1982) The action research approach to problem solving, with illustrations from irrigation management. Overseas Development Institute

  • Bridger H (2007) The consultant and the consulting process. Handout at the Midhurst Working Conference. The Bayswater Institute, London

  • Burke W, Church A (2006) Managing change, leadership style, and intolerance to ambiguity: a survey of organization development practitioners. Hum Resour Manage 31(4):301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao G, Clarke S et al. (1999) Towards systemic management of diversity in organizational change. Strat Change 8(4):205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (2002) Participatory workshops: a sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Act Res 11(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiades NJ, Phillimore L (1980) The myth of the hero-innovator and alternative strategies for organisational change. University of London

  • Gold S, Klein L (2004) Harold Bridger—Conversations and recollections. Org Soc Dyn 4(2):173–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Heracleous L (2002) The contribution of a discursive view to understanding and managing organizational change. Strat Change 11(5):253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen H, Normann R (2004) When research and practice collide: the role of action research when there is a conflict of interests with stakeholders. Syst Pract Act Res 17(3):207–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein L (2001) On the use of pshychoanalytic concepts in organizational social science. Concepts Transform 6(1):59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy B (1997) Strategic renewal: is disruptive revolution unavoidable? Strat Change 6(5):283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics. Hum Relat 1:5–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lousberg M, Soler J (1998) Action research and the evaluation of IT projects. Act Learn 8:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Open University (2000) T306 managing complexity: a systems approach. Open University, Milton Keynes

  • Paton G (2001) A systemic action learning cycle as the key element of an ongoing spiral of analyses. Syst Pract Act Res 14(1):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt M (2001) In pursuit of change: managerial constructions of strategic intent. Strat Change 10(1):2–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran S (2001) Methodology for an organisational action research thesis. Act Res Int Paper 3 (http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ssankaran01.html)

  • Stainer A, Stainer L (2000) Empowerment and strategic change: an ethical perspective. Strat Change 9(5):287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowell F, West D, Stansfield M (1997) Action research as a framework for IS research. In: Mingers J, Stowell F (eds) Information systems: an emerging discipline? McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead

  • Wadsworth Y (1998) What is participatory action research? Act Res Int Paper 2 (http://www.scu.edu.au/school/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Bell.

Additional information

The Authority and those involved in the research have been made anonymous in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, S. Systemic Approaches to Managing Across the Gap in the Public Sector: Results of an Action Research Programme. Syst Pract Act Res 21, 227–240 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9093-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9093-9

Keywords

Navigation