Abstract
This paper tells the story and conclusions of a 1 year research project which took place over the calendar year of 2006. It was undertaken within a local government authority (or Local Authority—LA) in the UK. The specific research question to be answered was: “Can the application of systems methods in the LA aid Authority staff in developing and enhancing their professional practice?” A supplementary question arising was: “Can such learning be of wider value to other sections of the public sector (for example in other regions of local government or the health sector)?” In the process of the year 91 separate action research interactions took place. The research comes to three systemically linked findings: Firstly, LA middle managers are often caught between two realities ... strategic initiatives and operational demands. In the gap between these two realities they experience change in many guises but most critically in terms of government directives, ICT initiatives and restructuring. Despite this complexity managers did not appear to always have adequate tools to deal with issues arising in their context. Secondly, an assessment matrix developed originally at the Open University is a valuable tool for assessing the systemisism and reflective capacities of staff and, thirdly, a new, blended hybrid training programme to develop systemic reflective practitioners able to manage across the strategy/operations gap was developed and pilot tested in 2007. This programme shows signs of providing enhanced professional practice and, at the time of writing, is being further piloted with a view to establishing its wider applicability within the public sector.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anessi-Pessina E, Cantu E (2006) Whither managerialism in the Italian national health service? Int J Health Plann Manage 21(4):327–355
Baskerville R, Wood-Harper T (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J Inform Technol 11:235–246
Baskerville R, Wood-Harper AT (1998) Diversity in information systems action research methods. Eur J Inform Syst 7:90–107
Bell S (1998) Self-reflection and vulnerability in action research: bringing forth new worlds in our learning. Syst Pract Act Res 11(2):179–192
Bell S (1999) Rapid and participatory IS analysis and design: a means to defy the ‘anatomy of confusion’? In: Castell A, Gregory A, Hindle G, James M, Ragsdell G (eds) Synergy matters: working with systems in the 21st century. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 523–528
Bell S, Christina A (2006) Applying systemic project management approaches for the UK national health service. Syst Pract Act Res 19(1):27–44
Bell S, Coleman G et al (2000) Information systems project in China: action research and soft systems methodology. Hum Syst Manage 19:181–192
Bell S, Morse S (2003) Learning from experience in sustainability. The 2003 international sustainable development research conference, University of Nottingham, UK
Bell S, Morse S (2007a) Problem structuring methods: theorising the benefits of deconstructing sustainable development projects. J Oper Res Soc 58:576–587
Bell S, Morse S (2007b) Story telling in sustainable development projects. Sustain Dev 15:97–110
Bell S, Wood-Harper AT (2007) Applying the multiview analysis and design methodology in a non-governmental organisation in Bangladesh. J Global Inform Technol Manage 10(2):7–33
Bottrall A (1982) The action research approach to problem solving, with illustrations from irrigation management. Overseas Development Institute
Bridger H (2007) The consultant and the consulting process. Handout at the Midhurst Working Conference. The Bayswater Institute, London
Burke W, Church A (2006) Managing change, leadership style, and intolerance to ambiguity: a survey of organization development practitioners. Hum Resour Manage 31(4):301–318
Cao G, Clarke S et al. (1999) Towards systemic management of diversity in organizational change. Strat Change 8(4):205–216
Chambers R (2002) Participatory workshops: a sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. Earthscan, London
Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Act Res 11(1):9–21
Georgiades NJ, Phillimore L (1980) The myth of the hero-innovator and alternative strategies for organisational change. University of London
Gold S, Klein L (2004) Harold Bridger—Conversations and recollections. Org Soc Dyn 4(2):173–190
Heracleous L (2002) The contribution of a discursive view to understanding and managing organizational change. Strat Change 11(5):253–261
Johnsen H, Normann R (2004) When research and practice collide: the role of action research when there is a conflict of interests with stakeholders. Syst Pract Act Res 17(3):207–236
Klein L (2001) On the use of pshychoanalytic concepts in organizational social science. Concepts Transform 6(1):59–72
Leavy B (1997) Strategic renewal: is disruptive revolution unavoidable? Strat Change 6(5):283–298
Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics. Hum Relat 1:5–41
Lousberg M, Soler J (1998) Action research and the evaluation of IT projects. Act Learn 8:36–40
Open University (2000) T306 managing complexity: a systems approach. Open University, Milton Keynes
Paton G (2001) A systemic action learning cycle as the key element of an ongoing spiral of analyses. Syst Pract Act Res 14(1):95–112
Pitt M (2001) In pursuit of change: managerial constructions of strategic intent. Strat Change 10(1):2–21
Sankaran S (2001) Methodology for an organisational action research thesis. Act Res Int Paper 3 (http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ssankaran01.html)
Stainer A, Stainer L (2000) Empowerment and strategic change: an ethical perspective. Strat Change 9(5):287–296
Stowell F, West D, Stansfield M (1997) Action research as a framework for IS research. In: Mingers J, Stowell F (eds) Information systems: an emerging discipline? McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead
Wadsworth Y (1998) What is participatory action research? Act Res Int Paper 2 (http://www.scu.edu.au/school/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The Authority and those involved in the research have been made anonymous in this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bell, S. Systemic Approaches to Managing Across the Gap in the Public Sector: Results of an Action Research Programme. Syst Pract Act Res 21, 227–240 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9093-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9093-9