Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Janusian Mapping: A Mechanism of Interpretation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper it is argued that human interpretation is an inherently paradoxical and complex mechanism. Human interpretation is underpinned by values, preferences and contrasts, and assumptions, and surfaced through an idiosyncratic combination of personal choice and logic (Pinker, The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature, 2003). In order to find ways through interpretive diversity, Janusian thinking is a conscious and purposeful mechanism (Rothenberg, Creat Res J 9(2–3):207–231, 1996) that allows each one to think paradoxically. Coping with paradoxes is not only a cognitive challenge in trying to resolve the irresolvable but also an emotional one, as emotion might distort the paradox. Janusian attitudinal mapping allows individuals to face the true paradox and to review the assumptions behind it. Such review may modify or even abolish certain assumptions altogether. However, Janusian attitudinal mapping is an emotional undertaking that should follow the three elements involving social reform for advancing and fostering knowledge: shock, open communication and experimentation, and paradox leadership (Lewis, Acad Manage Rev 25(4):760–786, 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While Lewis (2000) refers to paradox, her taxonomy is of types of distortion of paradox. Nevertheless, we used her definition when referring to her work.

References

  • Aristotle (323 BCE/1926) Politics (Books I–VIII), Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Bridgman PW (1954) Remarks on the present state of operationalism. Sci Mon 79:224–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon TB (1996) Welcome to the revolution: managing paradox in the 21st century. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA Jr (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res 16(1):64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E (1982) The meaning of things. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois R (1974) Beast or angel. Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R, Shapiro D (2005) Beyond reason: using emotions as you negotiate. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Jackson MC (1992) Creative problem solving. Total systems intervention. Wiley, Chicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Ford LW (1994) Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Acad Manage Rev 19(4):756–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman K (2006) IDEX online research: Tempelsman issues warning to diamond industry, available at: http://www.idexonline.com/start.asp?purl=portal_FullNews%2easp%3fid%3d26095. Accessed 2006

  • Gibson EJ (1970) The ontogeny of reading. Am Psychol 25:136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré R (1963) The language of morals. Oxford Paperbacks, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel GWF (Miller AV, trans.) (1806–1975) Phenomenology of mind (Phenomenologie Des Geistes), Oxford University Press, London

  • Hinkle D (1965) The change of personal constructs from the point of view of a theory of construct implication (unpublished PhD thesis). Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

  • Howard AR, Kelly GA (1954) A theoretical approach to psychological movement. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 49:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I, 1781/1999, Critique of pure reason, Hackett, Indianapolis

  • Kegan R, Lahey LL (2001a) How the way we talk can change the way we work. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan R, Lahey LL (2001b) The real reason people won’t change. Harv Bus Rev 79(10): 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G (1970) A brief introduction to personal construct theory. In: Fransella F (ed) International handbook of personal construct theory, John Wiley and Sons LTD, London, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Landfield AW (1976) Interpretive man: the enlarged self-image, In: Cole JK, Landfield AW (eds) Nebraska symposium on motivation: personal construct psychology, vol 24. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 127–177

  • Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strat Manage J 13(special issue):111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad Manage Rev 25(4):760–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1894/1977) Selected works, vol 1–3. Vantage, New York

  • Miller D (1993) The architecture of simplicity. Acad Manage Rev 18:116–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostovicz I (2006) Unmined potential: how coffee could save the diamond industry. Market Leader 33:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnighan JK, Conlon DE (1991) The dynamics of intense work groups: a study of British string quartets. Admin Sci Quarter 36(2):165–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer RA, Anderson A, Stockton L (2001) Snakes versus ladders: a validation of laddering technique as a measure of hierarchical structure. J Construct Psychol 14(2):85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer R (1956) Analogy in science. Am Psychol 11:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattakos A, Covey SR (2004) The prisoners of thought: Viktor Frankl’s principles at work, CA. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (2003) The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole MS, van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organisation theories. Acad Manage Rev 14(4):562–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg A (1971) The process of Janusian thinking in creativity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 24(3):195–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg A (1979) The emerging goddess: the creative process in art, science and other fields. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg A (1996) The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creat Res J 9(2–3):207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychlak JF (1968) Philosophy of science for personality theory. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury RM (2002) Paradoxes, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KJ (1990) The paradoxical self: toward an understanding of our contradictory nature. Insight Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer JE (1966) Motivation for consistency. In: Feldman S (ed) Cognitive consistency: motivational antecedents and behavioral consequences, Academic Press, New York, pp 47–73

  • Smith KK, Berg DN (1987) Paradoxes of group life. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T (1999) A dual-process model of defence against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. Psychol Rev 106:835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince R, Broussine M (1996) Paradox, defence and attachment: accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organ Stud 17(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Janus Thinking Ltd., 11, Albertstraat, B-2018, Antwerp, Belgium

    E. Isaac Mostovicz

  2. Northampton Business School, The University of Northampton, Park Campus, C21, Boughton Green Road, Northampton, NN2 7AL, UK

    Nada K. Kakabadse

  3. Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, Beds, MK43 OAL, UK

    Andrew P. Kakabadse

Authors
  1. E. Isaac Mostovicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nada K. Kakabadse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew P. Kakabadse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Isaac Mostovicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mostovicz, E.I., Kakabadse, N.K. & Kakabadse, A.P. Janusian Mapping: A Mechanism of Interpretation. Syst Pract Act Res 21, 211–225 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9092-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9092-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation