Skip to main content
Log in

Oral and Written Reflection in Practice Management: An Action Research Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reflection in Practice Management (PM) favoured the integrated approach where learners had to critically reflect on the study material, assessments and tasks throughout the year and to integrate their experiences in a meaningful manner that would demonstrate their development and learning over the year. Reflection in the form of portfolios focused on personal development and individual learning rather than on achieving a general set of course outcomes. But assessment of these portfolios revealed no real evidence of reflection or critical thinking. This study suggested that learners be assessed orally so that their reflections could come alive and so that the educator could learn from the assessment to restructure or re-curriculate where necessary. This study found that although the orals were not a preferred form of assessment, they contributed successfully to informing the written critical and reflective thinking in the portfolios. Using an action research approach, enabled us to not only address a fundamental problem that the educators and learners were battling with—how to encourage and indeed teach learners to think critically and to reflect, but it also showed the educators how to solve problems or seek solutions to didactic problems in their own classrooms. The recommendations in this paper may therefore inform courses other than PM that use reflective practice, critical thinking or portfolio assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt H (1978) The life of the mind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodigan DL (1992) Focus group interviews: applications for institutional research. Research paper no. 43. Association of institutional research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R (1995) Portfolio development and profiling for nurses, 2nd edn. Quay Publications, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb P (1994) Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educ Res 22(7):13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey SM (1953) Action research to improve school practices. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis B, Sumara D, Luce-Kapler R (2000) Engaging minds: learning and teaching in a complex world. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson G, Green KL (2001) The external researcher in participatory action research. Educ Action Res 9(2):243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endacott R, Gray M, Jasper M, McMullan M, Miller C, Scholes J, Webb C (2002) Evaluation of the ‘Use of portfolios in the assessment of learning and competence’ in nursing, midwifery and health visiting. Plymouth University, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury SC (1998) Social studies, trivial constructivism, and the politics of social knowledge. In: Larochelle M, Bednarz N, Garrison J (eds) Constructivism and education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 156–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud P (1990) The expressive body: a common ground for the sociology of emotions and health and illness. Sociol Health Illn 2(4):452–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan TN, Murphy C (2001) The co-operative education process and organizational socialization. A qualitative study of student perceptions of its effectiveness. Educ Train 43(6):281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaze J (2002) Stages in coming to terms with reflection: student advanced nurse practitioners perceptions of their reflective journeys. J Adv Nurs 37(3):265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield PM (1999) A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In: Rogoff B, Lave J (eds) Everyday cognition: its development in social context. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 117–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1996) Being and time. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysamen GK (1994) Methodology for the social and behavioural sciences. International Thomson Publishing, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulatt I (1995) A sad reflection. Nurs Stand 9(20):22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Jickling B (2003) Environmental education and environmental advocacy: revisited. J Environ Educ 34(2):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlowicz KA (2000) The value of student portfolios to evaluate undergraduate nursing programs. Nurs Educ 25:82–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp J (1975) A guide to assessing prior experience through portfolios. Education testing service, Cooperative Assessment of Experiential Learning, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman LC (1990) Assessing educational effectiveness: the focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Commun Educ 38:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1946) Action research and minority problems. J Sci Issues 2(4):34–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linville D, Lambert-Shute J, Fruhauf CA, Piercy FP (2003) Using participatory focus groups of graduate students to improve academic departments: a case example. Qual Rep 8(2):210–223. Available http://www.nova.ed/ssss/QR/QR8-2/linville.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandeville TF, Menchaca V (1994) Group oral exams: Exploring assessment techniques for new instructional paradigms. Res Instruct 33(4):319–325

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon T (1999) Is reflective practice synonymous with action research? Educ Action Res 7(1):163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan JH (1996) Educational research: fundamentals for the consumer, 2nd edn. Harper Collins College Press, New York

  • McNiff J (1988) Action research: principles and practice. Macmillan Education Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie C, Tobin K (1997) A social constructivist perspective on learning environments. Int J Sci Educ 19(2):193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melrose M (2001) Maximising the rigour of action research: why would you want to? How could you? Field Methods 13:160–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills GE (2000) Action research: a guide for the teacher researcher. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll LC (1993) Introduction. In: Moll LC (ed) Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll LC, Greenberg JB (1993) Creating zones of possibilities: combining social contexts for instruction. In: Moll LC (ed) Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 319–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon J (1999) Reflection in learning and professional development: theory and practice. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortari L (2003) Educating to think in environmental education. S Afr J Environ Educ 20:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke SE (1992) The work and workplace of teachers in action research. Teach Teach Educ 8:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke SE (1997) Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. Rev Res Educ 22:305–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke SE, Stevenson R (1995) Educational action research. Teachers College, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WL (2000) Social research methods. Quantitative and qualitative approaches, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oja SN, Smulyan L (1989) Collaborative action research: a developmental approach. Falmer Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez AI, Blanco N, Ogalla M, Rossi F (1998) The flexible role of the researcher within the changing context of practice: forms of collaboration. Educ Action Res 6(2):241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price A (1994) Midwifery portfolios: making reflective records. Mod Midwife 4:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (2001) Handbook for action research. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman W (1994) Portfolios for development: a guide for trainers and managers. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth WM (1994) Experimenting in a constructivist high school Physics laboratory. J Res Sci Teach 31(2):197–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlebusch G (2002) Cognition and the language of learning in South Africa: a grade economics perspective. Qual Rep 7(3). Available: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-3/schlebusch.html

  • Scriven M, Paul R (2004) Defining critical thinking. Available http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/definingCT.shtml

  • Spradley J (1980) Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer ET (1993) Socially responsive educational research: linking theory and practice. In: Flinders D, Mills GE (eds) Theory and concepts in qualitative research: perspectives from the field. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 141–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Udas K (1998) Participatory action research as critical pedagogy Syst Pract Action Res 11(6):599–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Galsersfeld E (1987) Learning as a constructive activity. In: Janvier C (ed) Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society. Harvard University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1981) The genesis of higher mental functions. In: Wertsch J (ed) The concept of activity in soviet psychology. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp 144–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1987) Thinking and speech. In: Rieber RW, Carton AS (eds) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. vol 1: problems of general psychology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 37–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1993) Thought and language. Revised and edited by A. Kozulin. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells G (ed) (1994) Changing schools from within: creating communities of inquiry. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel LS, Briggs KL, Puryear BL (1998) Portfolio: authentic assessment in the age of the curriculum revolution. J Nurs Educ 37:208–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch JV (1985) Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter G (2000) A comparative discussion of the notion of ‘validity’ in qualitative and quantitative research. Qual Rep 4:(3–4) [Online] Available http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt O (1996) New directions in action research. Falmer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based upon work supported financially by the National Research Foundation. Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author and therefore the NRF does not accept any liability in regard thereto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Penny Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, P. Oral and Written Reflection in Practice Management: An Action Research Approach. Syst Pract Act Res 21, 171–185 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9089-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9089-5

Keywords

Navigation