Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Systemic Intervention in a University Department: Reflections on Arrested Action Research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reflects on my experience as an insider researcher attempting to use critical systems ideas and practices to promote quality improvement in a university engineering department. Reflection is a key part of learning. This paper is intended to contribute to critically, self-reflective learning for the community of systems practitioners. These reflections on my questions about participation, ethics, politics of process, and the choices and actions resulting from them may help others to formulate their own. The complexity of systems practice places substantial demands on the researcher, particularly in the case of insider, practitioner research. Nevertheless, the exploration of critical systems approaches to critique boundaries and structure ‘problems’ in the core aspects of higher education in locally meaningful ways should continue. While demanding, it still can work to promote learning about authentic quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL, Pourdehand J (2001) On misdirected systems. Syst Res 18:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askling B, Stensaker B (2002) Academic leadership: prescriptions, practices and paradoxes. TEAM 8:113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwater R (2000) Pluralism, economic rhetoric, and common property. Syst Prac Act Res 13:543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badley G (2004) Reading an academic journal is like doing ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 5(1):Article 40. Retrieved on 20 June 2006 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1–04/1-04badley-e.htm

  • Baldwin G (1994) The student as customer: the discourse of “quality” in higher education. J Tert Educ Adm 16:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy BH (1999) Systems thinking in higher education: learning comes into focus. Syst Res 16:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton J, Emery M, Flood RL, Selsky JW, Wolstenholme E (2004) A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives. Syst Prac Act Res 17:3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1984) The viable system model: its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Oper Res Soc 35:7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter L, Hughes C, Tight M (1998) Telling it how it is: accounts of academic life. High Educ Q 52:300–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden J, Marton F (1998) The university of learning: beyond quality and competence in higher education. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael R, Palermo J, Reeve L, Vallence K (2001) Student learning: ‘the heart of quality’ in education and training. Assess Eval High Educ 26:450–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr W, Kemmis S (1986) Becoming critical—education, knowledge and action research. Falmer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck C (2004) A cybernetic systems model of teaching and research production: Impact of disciplinary difference. Paper presented at the international colloquium on research and teaching: closing the divide? Winchester Hampshire, UK. Retrieved on May 30, 2006 from http://www.solent.ac.uk/ExternalUP/318/carol_colbeck_s_updated_paper.doc

  • Coupal L (2004) Practitioner-research and the regulation of research ethics: the challenge of individual, organizational, and social interests [34 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal] 6(1):Art. 6. Retrieved on 20 June 2006 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-6-e.htm

  • Coghlan D, Shani AB (2005) Roles, politics and ethics in action research design. Syst Prac Act Res 15:533–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1993) The new economics for industry, education and government. MIT CAES, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton L (2001) Research and teaching: conditions for a positive link. Teach High Educ 6:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (1995) Solving problem solving: a potent force for effective management. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Jackson M (1991) Creative problem solving: total systems intervention. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith PL (1998) Systems dynamics and university management. Syst Dynam Rev 14:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith PL (1999a) Systems thinking: a missing component in higher education planning? High Educ Policy 12:141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith PL (1999b) Universities as learning organisations—or not! In: Proceedings of 17th international conference of the system dynamics society and 5th Australian and New Zealand systems conference [CD-ROM], Wellington

  • Gregory A (2000) Problematizing participation: a critical review of approaches to participation in evaluation theory. Evaluation 6:179–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey L, Knight PT (1996) Transforming higher education. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawk DL (1999) Innovation versus environmental protection presumptions. Syst Prac Act Res 12:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsburgh M (1999) Quality monitoring in higher education: the impact on student learning. Qual High Educ 5:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston DJ (2007) TQM and higher education: a critical systems perspective on fitness for purpose. Qual High Educ 13:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa K (1985) What is total quality control? The Japanese way. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison R (1999) Applying systems thinking to higher education. Syst Res 16:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques ML (1999) The call of quality: doing right things right. Qual Prog 32(9):48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch LR, Orwig RA (1997) A violation of assumptions about TQM: why TQM won’t work in the ivory tower. J Qual Manag 2:279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauch LR, Orwig RA (1999) The quality revolution in academe: a rejoinder to Mullin and Wilson. J Qual Manag 4(2):265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins A (2004) A guide to the research evidence on teaching-research relations. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved on August 26, 2005 from http: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?process=full_record&section=generic&id=383

  • Kezar A (2005) What campuses need to know about organizational learning and the learning organization. New Dir Higher Educ 131:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar A, Eckel P (2002) The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education. J High Edu 73:435–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight P, Trowler PR (2000) Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Stud High Educ 25:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas L (2004) Embedding quality: the challenges for higher education. Qual Assur Educ 12:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone S (2003) Ethics at home: informed consent in your own backyard. Qual Stud Educ 16:797–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre J (2004) Facilitating critical systemic praxis (CSP) by means of experiential learning and conceptual tools. Syst Res 21:37–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam E (2004) W(h)ither practitioner research? Aust Educ Res 31:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf GS (2003) Learning to design systems. World Future 59:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer LH, Evans IM (2003) Motivating the professoriate: why sticks and carrots are only for donkeys. High Educ Manag Policy 15:151–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Tempered radicalism and the politics and ambivalence of change. Organ Sci 6:585–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton A (1999) Ethics in action. Syst Prac Act Res 12:219–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin R, Wilson G (2000) Quality of undergraduate education: examining the current paradigm and system. J Quality Manag 5:225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton J (2002) Barriers to effective quality management and leadership: case study of two academic departments. High Educ 44:185–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan KM (2002) Scholarly dimensions of academics’ beliefs about engineering education. Teachers Teach 8:41–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdell G (2000) Engineering a paradigm shift? An holistic approach to organisational change management. J Organ Change Manag 13:104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason P (2006) Choice and quality in action research practice. J Manage Inq 15:187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger RK, Gustafson LT, Demarie SM, Mullane JV (1994) Reframing the organization: why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Acad Manage Rev 19:565–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Random House, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour D, Kelley JM, Jasinski J (2004) Linking planning, quality improvement, and institutional research. New Dir Inst Res 123:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock G (1998) Performance management and cultural difference in the Australian university. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 36:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soobrayan V (2003) Ethics, truth and politics in constructivist qualitative research. Westminst Stud Educ 26:107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear R (2001) The dark side of the moon—unilluminated dimensions of systems practice. Syst Pract Act Res 14:779–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanthan G, Dalrymple J (2005) Implementation of a holistic model for quality in higher education. Qual High Educ 11:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swepson P (2003) Some common ground that can provide a basis for collaboration between action researchers and scientists: a philosophical case that works in practice. Syst Prac Act Res 16(2):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickle L (2001) Opening windows, closing doors: ethical dilemmas in educational action research. J Philos Educ 35:345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler PR (2005) A sociology of teaching, learning and enhancement: improving practices in higher education. Rev Sociol 76:13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2001) The quest for competence in systemic research and practice. Syst Res 18:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Haslett T (2002) Action research in management—ethical dilemmas. Syst Prac Act Res 15(6):523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1976) Educational organisations as loosely coupled systems. Admin Sci Quart 21:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil S (1999) Re-creating universities for ‘beyond the stable state’: from ‘dearingesque’ systematic control to post-dearing systemic learning and inquiry. Syst Res 16:171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright T (1999) Systems thinking and systems practice: working in the fifth dimension. Syst Prac Act Res 12:607–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeni J (1998) A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educ Action Res 6(1):9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Technology and Engineering, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand

    Don Houston

Authors
  1. Don Houston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don Houston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houston, D. Systemic Intervention in a University Department: Reflections on Arrested Action Research. Syst Pract Act Res 21, 133–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-007-9087-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-007-9087-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation