Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 97–104 | Cite as

Action Learning and Action Research (ALAR): A Methodological Integration in an Inter-Organizational Setting

  • David CoghlanEmail author
  • Paul Coughlan
Original Paper


The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how action learning and action research were used concurrently as a single ALAR methodology in one research project which focused on collaborative improvement in the supply chain. The research in which the ALAR methodology was used was a European Union funded research project called CO-IMPROVE which sought to develop a business model, supported by a web-based software system, and action learning-based implementation guidelines to support the design, implementation and ongoing development of collaborative improvement between partners in Extended Manufacturing Enterprises (EMEs). The article describes how the participating managers worked in an action learning to achieve their commercial objectives and how action research was used by academic researchers to consolidate the action learning processes and to generate actionable knowledge.


Action learning Action research ALAR Extended manufacturing enterprise Inter-organizational dynamics CO-IMPROVE 


  1. Adler N, Shani AB (Rami) (2001) In search of an alternative framework for the creation of actionable knowledge: table-tennis research at Ericsson. In: Pasmore W, Woodman RW (eds) Research in organizational change and development, vol 13. JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp 43–79Google Scholar
  2. Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith D (1985) Action science. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris C (1993) Knowledge for action. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris C, Schon D (1996) Organizational learning II. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  5. Chisholm RF (1998) Developing network organizations. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  6. Coghlan D, Coughlan P (2002) Developing organizational learning capabilities in inter-organizational action learning. In: Rahim MA, Golembiewski RT, MacKenzie KD (eds) Current topics in management, vol 7. Transaction, New Brunswick, pp 33–46Google Scholar
  7. Coghlan D, Coughlan P (2003) Acquiring the capacity for operational improvement: an action research opportunity. Hum Resour Plann 26(2):30–38Google Scholar
  8. Coghlan D, Coughlan P (2006) Designing and implementing collaborative improvement in the extended manufacturing enterprise: action learning and action research (ALAR) in CO-IMPROVE. Learn Organ 13(2):152–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coghlan D, Coughlan P, Brennan L (2004) Organising for research and action: implementing action researcher networks. Syst Pract Action Res 17(1):37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coughlan P, Coghlan D (2004) Action learning: towards a framework in inter-organizational settings. Action Learn Theory Res 1(1):43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight L (2002) Network learning: exploring learning by inter-organizational networks. Hum Relat 55(4):427–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knight L, Pye A (2004) Exploring the relationships between network change and network learning. Manage Learn 35(4):473–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lane C (2001) Organizational learning in supplier networks. In: Diekes M, Antal A, Child J, Nonaka I (eds) Handbook of organizational knowledge and learning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 699–714Google Scholar
  15. Lowstedt J, Stjernberg T (2006) Producing management knowledge. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  16. McGill I, Beaty L (1995) Action learning, 2nd edn. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Marguardt M (1999) Action learning in action. Davies-Black, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  18. Marquardt M (2004) Optimizing the power of action learning. Davies-Black, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  19. Middel R, Brennan L, Coghlan D, Coughlan P (2005) The application of action learning and action research in collaborative improvement within the extended manufacturing enterprise. In: Kotzab H, Seuring S, Müller M, Reiner GG (eds) Research methodologies in supply chain management. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 365–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raelin JA (1999) Preface. Manage Learn 30(2):115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reason P, Torbert WR (2001) The action turn: toward a transformational social science. Concepts Transform 6(1):1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Revans RW (1982) The origins and growth of action learning. Chantwell Bratt, BromleyGoogle Scholar
  23. Sankaran S, Dick B, Passfield R, Swepson P (2001) Effective change management using action learning and action research. Southern Cross University Press, LismoreGoogle Scholar
  24. Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Swepson P, Dick B, Zuber-Skerritt O, Passfield R, Carroll A-M, Wadsworth Y (2003) A history of the action learning, action research and process management association (ALARPM): from Brisbane to the world through inclusions and networks. Syst Pract Action Res 16(4)Google Scholar
  26. Zuber-Skerritt O (2003) A model for designing action learning and action research programs. Learn Organ 9(4):143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessTrinity CollegeDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations