Notes
The book contains chapters by Brian Caterino, Sanford Schram, David Laitin, Bent Flyvbjerg, Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, Corey Shdaimah and Roland Stahl, Theodore Schatzki, Mary Hawkesworth, Steward Clegg, Leslie Paul Theile, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, Greg Kasza, David Kettler, and Timothy Luke.
References
Eikeland O (2006) Phrónêsis, Aristotle, and action research. Int J Action Res 2(1):5–53
Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making social science matter—why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Furner M (1975) Advocacy and objectivity: a crisis in the professionalization of American social science, 1865–1905. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington
Madoo Lengermann P, Niebrugge-Brantley J (1998) The women founders: Sociology and social theory, 1830–1930. Mc-Graw-Hill, Boston
Messer-Davidow E (2002) Disciplining feminism: from social activism to academic discourse. Duke University Press, Durham
Price D (2004) Threatening anthropology. Duke University Press, Durham
Ross D (1991) The origin of American social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I profited from comments by Sidney Tarrow on this review, including help in learning more about the perestroika movement in political science. He does not agree with all of my formulations and bears no responsibility for them.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenwood, D.J. Sanford F. Schram and Brian Caterino (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. Syst Pract Act Res 21, 191–196 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-007-9085-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-007-9085-1