Abstract
Georges Florovsky’s essay ‘On the Grounding of Logical Relativism’ has attracted attention from various theologians and students of Russian thought but has until now avoided a serious philosophical analysis and critique. The complex but thought-provoking essay presents Florovsky’s so-called logical relativism, a position which he seemed to maintain for the rest of his career. This paper will show that by conflating ‘scientific’ with ‘alethic’ relativism, Florovsky exposed himself to detrimental philosophical and theological critique. After some methodological remarks, the first part of the paper will introduce Florovsky’s article, and present its central argument as a scientific relativism which is then conflated with a truly logical or alethic relativism. The second and third parts will highlight the philosophical and theological problems with Florovsky’s position.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In text references refer, respectively, to both the English translation of Florovsky’s essay and the Russian original. Boyle’s translation is problematic in certain areas and has thus been adjusted where necessary. Noticeably, Boyle’s translation does not maintain Florovsky’s original italicised emphases.
References
Anderson, James. 2018. Paradox in christian theology: An analysis of its presence, character, and epistemic status. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.
Anderson, James, and Greg Welty. 2011. The lord of non-contradiction: An argument for god from logic. Philosophia Christi 13: 321–338.
Arida, Robert. 2013. Gleanings from father Georges Florovsky’s “On the Substantiation of Logical Relativism”. \(\varTheta\)EO\(\varLambda\)O\(\varGamma\)IA 1: 17–24.
Bonini, Nicolao, Daniel Osherson, Riccardo Viale, and Timothy Williamson. 1999. On the psychology of vague predicates. Mind & Language 14: 377–393.
Bourget, David, and David Chalmers. 2023. Philosophers on philosophy: The philpapers survey. Philosopher’s Imprint 0: 1–64.
Clement of Alexandria. 2016. Stromata. Aeterna Press.
Coakely, Sarah. 2002. What does Chalcedon solve and what does it not? Some reflections on the status and meaning of the Chalcedonian “definition”. In The incarnation: An interdisciplinary symposium on the incarnation of the son of god, eds. Stephen T. Davis et al., 143–163. Oxford: OUP.
Dagys, Jonas. 2020. Logic and early christianity. Philosopica Critica 6: 72–78.
Ermishin, Oleg. 2013. Nieizvestnaya stat’ya G. V. Florovskogo v kontekste sovremennoy filosofskoy teologii. Filosofskie Nauki 10: 93–99.
Florovsky, Georges. 1924. K Obosnovaniiu Logecheskogo Reliativizma [On the Grounding of Logical Relativism]. Uchenie Zapiski [Scientific Notes] 1: 93–125.
Florovsky, Georges. 1989. On the substantiation of logical relativism, trans. Catherine Boyle. In Collected works, Vol. 12, 143–169. Belmont: Nordland Publishing Company.
Florovsky, Georges. 2013. Filosofiya i Religiya. Filosofskie Nauki 10: 100–105.
Gallaher, Brandon. 2021. Waiting for the barbarians: Identity and polemicism in the neo-patristic synthesis of Georges Florovsky. In The patristic witness of Georges Florovsky: Essential theological writings, eds. Brandon Gallaher and Paul Ladouceur, 153–188. London: T&T Clark.
Horn, Laurence R. 1997. Contradiction. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. 2018. Accessed 7 Jun 2023.
Hyde, Dominic. 1997. From heaps and gaps to heaps of gluts. Mind 106, 641–660.
Irenaeus. 2018. Against heresies. Aeterna Press.
Itter, Andrew C. 2009. Esoteric teaching in the Stromateis of Clement of Alexandria. Leiden: Brill.
John of Damascus. 2012. An exact exposition of the orthodox faith. In Writings. Washington: Ex Fontibus.
Karamanolis, George. 2013. The philosophy of early christianity. Bristol, CT: Acumen.
Lossky, Nicholas. 1952. History of Russian philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwen Ltd.
Lourié, Basil. 2018. A freedom beyond conflict: The logic of internal conflict and the free will in Maximus the Confessor. Scrinium 14: 63–74.
Maximus the Confessor. 2014. The ambigua, Vols. I and II, trans. Nicholas Constas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McCall, Thomas H. 2021. Analytic christology and the theological interpretation of the New Testament. Oxford: OUP.
Nazinazus, Gregory. 2002. Theological orations. In On god and christ: The five theological orations and two letters to Cledonius, New York: SVS Press.
Nesteruk, Alexei V. 2000. Light from the East: Theology, science, and the eastern, orthodox tradition. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Obolevitch, Teresa. 2015. Faith and knowledge in the thought of Georges Florovsky. In Faith and reason in Russian thought, eds. Teresa Obolevitch and Paweł Rojek, 197–218. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.
Paseau, Alexander C. 2022. Logos, logic and maximal infinity. Religious Studies 58: 420–435.
Plekhanov, Gyorgii. 1929. Fundamental problems of Marxism. ed. David Ryazanov. New York: International Publishers.
Priest, Graham. 1998. What is so bad about contradictions? The Journal of Philosophy 95: 410–426.
Radner, Ephraim. 2016. Time and the word: Figural readings of the christian scriptures. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Rojek, Paweł. 2016. Intellectus quaerens fidem: Georges Florovsky on the relation between philosophy and theology. Roczniki Filozoficzne 64: 147–163.
Shaw, Lewis. 1992. The philosophical evolution of Georges Florovsky: Philosophical psychology and the philosophy of history. St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 36: 240–242.
Solonin, Yuri, and Sergei Dudnik. 2006. Russkii Fiktsionalizm [Russian Fictionalism]. Anthropology: Web-Kafedra Filosofskoi Antropologii. http://www.anthropology.ru/ru/text/solonin-yun/russkiy-fikcionalizm. Accessed 17 May 2023.
Tertullian. 1885. Against hermogenes, trans. Peter Holmes. In Ante-nicene fathers, Vol. 3, eds. Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co.
Vaihinger, Hans. 1935. The philosophy of ‘as if’: A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind, trans. C. K. Ogden. London: Kegan Paul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
I confirm that this paper complies with all necessary ethical standards and that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, H.J. Florovsky’s logical relativism: a philosophical and theological analysis. Stud East Eur Thought (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09564-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09564-8