Skip to main content
Log in

The writing of Cosmist philosophers Alexander N. Gorsky, Nikolai A. Setnitsky and Valeryan N. Muravyov as a synthesis of literature and philosophy

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the body of work produced in the 1920–1930s by the Cosmist philosophers Alexander Gorsky, Nikolai Setnitsky, and Valeryan Muravyov as a representative case of the interaction between philosophy and literature typical for the Russian culture in the nineteenth to twentieth centuries. The article demonstrates how the synthesizing nature of the Cosmists’ creative thought, along with the multiplicity of their cultural roles, led to their use of genre forms which combined two types of writing, the literary and the philosophical, namely, philosophical mystery plays, philosophical poems, aphorisms, and fragments. In addition, their aesthetic views and creative productions are shown in connection with the philosophical legacy of Nikolai Fedorov, who explored the notions of “projective culture,” of history as salvatory work, and of art as a re-creation of life (“zhiznetvorchestvo”). This study of poetry and prose of Gorsky, Setnitsky and Muravyov reveals the links between their aesthetic views, which were based on the notion of “cultural Central Image” (Tsentroobraz), and their creative practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. That the grave is not the only outcome/That the death itself is optional.

References

  • Aksenov, G. P. (1992). Vremiavlastie (O Valeryane Muravʹeve i ego filosofii) [The Power over time (On Valeryan Muravyov and his philosophy)]. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanova O. A., & Gacheva A. G. (Eds.) (2018). Novozavetnye obrazy i siuzhety v kulʹture russkogo modernizma [New Testament imagery and plots in the culture of Russian modernism]. Moscow, Indrik (“Vechnye” obrazy i siuzhety. Vyp. 4 [“Eternal” images and plots, issue 4]).

  • Dostoevsky, F. M. (1982). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 30 t., t. 24 [Complete works in 30 volumes, Vol. 24]. Leningrad: Nauka.

  • Fedorov, N. F. (1997). Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t., t. 3. [Collected works in 4 volumes, Vol. 3]. Moscow: Progress Publication, 1995.

  • Gacheva, A. G. (2015). Ot imiaslaviia k imiadeistviiu: A.K. Gorskii, N.A. Setnitskii, V.N. Muravʹev v krugu sporov ob Imeni [From imyaslavie to imyadeistvie: A.K. Gorsky, N.A. Setnitsky and V.N. Muravyov in the dispute over the Name]. Voprosy filosofii, 3, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gacheva, A. G. (2019). “Ideal ved’ tozhe deistvitel’nost’…” Russkaia filosofiia i literatura [“The ideal is also a reality…” Russian philosophy and literature]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt.

  • Gorsky, A. K., & Setnitsky, N. A. (1995). Sochineniia [Works]. Moscow: Raritet Publ.Gorsky, A.K., Setnitsky, N.A. (1995). Sochineniia [Works]. Moscow: Raritet Publication.

  • Gorsky, A.K. (2018a). Sochineniia i pisʹma, kniga 1 [Works and letters. Book 1]. Moscow: IMLI RAS Publication

  • Gorsky, A. K. (2018b). Sochineniia i pisʹma, kniga 2 [Works and letters. Book 2]. Moscow: IMLI RAS Publication

  • Hagemeister, M. (1989). Nikolaj Fedorov. Studien zu Leben, Werk und Wirkung. München: Otto Sagner.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemeister, M. (2009). Imjaslavie — Imjadejstvie. Namenmystik und Namensmagie in Ruβland (1900–1930). In Namen: Benennung — Verehrung — Wirkung. Positionen der europäischen Moderne. Berlin, 2009, s. 77–98.

  • Kasatkina, T. A. (2015). Sviashchennoe v povsednevnom: Dvusostavnyi obraz v proizvedeniiakh F.M. Dostoevskogo [The Sacred in the mundane: The twofold image in Dostoevsky’s works]. Moscow: IMLI RAS Publication

  • Makarov, V. G. (2002a). Muravʹev V.N. Ochelovechennoe vremia [Humanized time]. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 100–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarov, V. G. (2002b). Aleksandr Gorskii: Sud’ba, pokalechennaia “po pravu vlasti” [Aleksandr Gorsky: A Destiny destroyed “by right of power”]. Voprosy filosofii, 8, 98–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarov, V. G. (2004). Russkii filosof Nikolai Setnitskii: ot KVZHD do NKVD [The Russian philosopher Nikolai Setnitsky: from CEL [Chinese Eastern Railway] to the NKVD]. Voprosy filosofii, (7), 136–157.

  • Maslin, M.A. (Ed.) (2020) Russkaia filosofiia: Entsiklopediia [Russian philosophy: An encyclopedia / Edited by M. A. Maslin.]. Moscow: Mir filosofii Publication, 2020.

  • Muravyov, V. N. (1998). Ovladenie vremenem: Izbrannye filosofskie i publitsisticheskie proizvedeniiia [Grasping time: Selected philosophical and essayistic works]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muravyov, V. N. (2011a). Sochineniia, kniga 1. [Collected works, Book 1]. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publication

  • Muravyov, V. N. (2011b). Sochineniia, kniga 2. [Collected works, Book 2]. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publication

  • Prishvin, M. M. (2012). Dnevniki 1940–1941 [Diaries 1940–1941]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publication.

  • Semenova, S. G. (1990). Nikolai Fedorov: tvorchestvo zhizni [Nikolai Fedorov: the creation of life]. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatelʹ.

  • Semenova, S. G. (2004a). Metafizika russkoi literatury [The Metaphysics of Russian literature]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Izdatelʹskii dom «PoRog».

  • Semenova, S. G. (2004b). Filosof budushchego veka – Nikolai Fedorov [The philosopher of the future age—Nikolai Fedorov]. Moscow: Pashkov dom.

  • Semenova, S. G., & Gacheva, A. G. (Eds.) (1993). Russkii kosmizm: Antologiia filosofskoi mysli [The Russian cosmism: An Anthology of philosophical thought]. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press.

  • Setnitsky, N. A. (1927). Epafrodit [Epaphroditus]. Kharbin.

  • Setnitsky, N. A. (2003). Iz istorii filosofsko-esteticheskoi mysli 1920–1930-kh gg. Vyp. 1. N.A. Setnitskii [From the history of philosophical and aesthetic thought of the 1920–1930s, issue 1. N.A. Setnitskii] (pp. 231–250). Moscow: IMLI RAS Publication.

  • Setnitsky, N. A. (2010). Izbrannye sochineniia [Selected works], Moscow: ROSSPEN.

  • Stepanian, K. A. (2010). Iavlenie i dialog v romanakh F.M. Dostoevskogo [The Phenomenon and dialogue in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novels]. Sankt Petersburg: Kriga Publication

  • Takho-Godi, E. A. (Ed.) (2018). Russkaia literatura i filosofiia: Puti vzaimodeistviia, Vyp. 1 [Series “Russian literature and philosophy: Ways of interaction”, issue 1]. Moscow: Vodolei.

  • Zakharov, V. N. (Ed.) (1994–2014). Evangelʹskii tekst v russkoi literature XVIII–XX vekov: tsitata, reministsentsiia, motiv, siuzhet, zhanr [The Evangelical text in Russian literature of the 18th-20th cc.: Quotation, allusion, motif, plot, genre]. Vol. 1–9. Petrozavodsk, The publishing house of Petrozavodsk State University. (Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki. Vyp. 3, 5–12 [Problems of historical poetics, issue 3, 5–12]).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Gacheva.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gacheva, A.G. The writing of Cosmist philosophers Alexander N. Gorsky, Nikolai A. Setnitsky and Valeryan N. Muravyov as a synthesis of literature and philosophy. Stud East Eur Thought 72, 333–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09405-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09405-y

Keywords

Navigation