Studies in East European Thought

, Volume 64, Issue 1–2, pp 39–52 | Cite as

Weltanschauung as a priori: sociology of knowledge from a ‘romantic’ stance

Article

Abstract

In this paper I reconstruct the central concept of the young Lukács’s and Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge, as they present it in their writings in the early decades of the twentieth century. I argue that this concept, namely Weltanschauung, is used to refer to some conceptually unstructured totality of feelings, which they take to be a condition of possibility of intellectual production, and this understanding is contrasted to an alternative construal of the term that presents it as logically structured, quasi-theoretical background knowledge. This concept has Kantian reminiscences: it is a condition of possibility of intellectual production in general. The young Mannheim and Lukács rely on ‘Weltanschauung’ so understood as a phenomenon mediating between the facts of society and individual intellectual production and reception: it is seen as being conditioned by sociological facts and therefore as a historical and sociological category through which, and therefore indirectly, society enters into intellectual production.

Keywords

György Lukács Karl Mannheim Worldview Interpretation Ideology Historical a priori 

References

  1. Anderson, R. L. (2003). The debate over the Geisteswissenschaften in German philosophy. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), The cambridge history of philosophy (pp. 1870–1945). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bloor, D. (1973). Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Demeter, T. (2008). The sociological tradition of Hungarian philosophy. Studies in East European Thought, 60, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demeter, T. (2009). Can the strong program be generalized? Review of Sociology, 15, 5–16.Google Scholar
  5. Geuss, R. (1981). Ideology. In T. Eagleton (Ed.), Ideology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Hacking, I. (1985). Styles of scientific reasoning. In J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds.), Post-analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hanna, R. (2005). Kant and nonconceptual content. European Journal of Philosophy, 13, 247–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lukács, G. (1971). The theory of the novel. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lukács, G. (1977). Megjegyzések az irodalomtörténet elméletéhez. In Á. Tímár (Ed.), Ifjúkori Művek. Budapest: Magvető.Google Scholar
  10. Lukács, Gy. (1978). A modern dráma fejlődésének története. Budapest: Magvető.Google Scholar
  11. Mannheim, K. (1952). On the interpretation of ‘Weltanschauung’. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Mannheim, K. (1954). Ideology and utopia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Mannheim, K. (1980). Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Mannheim, K. (1986). Conservatism: A contribution to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. Mannheim, K. (1993). The ideological and the sociological interpretation of intellectual phenomena. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), From Karl Mannheim. New Brunswick: Transactions.Google Scholar
  16. Reill, P. H. (2003). The legacy of the ‘scientific revolution’. In R. Porter (Ed.), Cambridge history of science: Eighteenth-century science (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Seidel, M. (2011). Karl Mannheim, relativism and knowledge in the natural sciences—A deviant interpretation. In R. Schantz & M. Seidel (Eds.), The problem of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge. Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar
  18. Simmel, G. (1904). Kant. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
  19. Simmel, G. (2009). Conflict. In A. J. Blasi, A. K. Jacobs & M. Kanjirathinkal (Eds.), Sociology: Inquiries into the construction of social forms (Vol. 1). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.University of PecsPecsHungary

Personalised recommendations