Another conversion. Stanisław Brzozowski’s ‘diary’ as an early instance of the post-secular turn to religion

Article
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

This essay is an attempt to analyze an important decision Brzozowski took at the end of his life, i.e. his late turn towards Catholicism, which, despite his own objections, we should nonetheless call a religious conversion. The main reason why Brzozowski resisted the traditional rhetoric of conversion lies in his often repeated conviction that faith cannot invalidate life, because “what is not biographical, does not exist at all.” Brzozowski, therefore, rejects conversion understood as a radical and abrupt revolution of the soul, which annuls everything that happened before, and turns to a model of religiosity (“Catholicism, undoubtedly”) which preserves his entire biographical past. In this manner, Brzozowski seeks his own formula of faith, more adequate to the “situation” of the modern man who lives in and through History. I argue that the model of “conversion without conversion” Brzozowski chose as representative of modern man is typically, though avant la lettre, post-secular: closer to the Jewish sources of past-oriented tschuva than to the mystical timelessness of traditionally Christian metanoia. The idea that redemption consists not in a liberation of a pure spirit but in a patient working-through of the universal history of creation is an implicit credo of the whole modern age, first fully articulated by Brzozowski and only later in the writings of Hermann Cohen, Franz Rosenzweig, and Walter Benjamin. Brzozowski emerges as a relatively early precursor of the future post-secular option whose advocates, like the author of The Diary, will not allow themselves to “lose a single moment,” either of their lives or the world’s history.

Keywords

Conversion Post-secular Christian versus Jewish Naturalism Culturalism Historicism Catholic Church 

References

  1. Ahlstrom, S. (2004). A religious history of the American people. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, A. (2003). Saint Paul, The foundation of Universalism (R. Brassier, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, W. (1998). The origin of German tragic drama (J. Osborne, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, E. (2000). The spirit of Utopia (A. Nassar, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brzozowski, S. (1912). Głosy wsród nocy. Studya nad przesileniem romantycznem kultury europejskiej. Lwów: Księgarnia Polska Bernarda Połonieckiego.Google Scholar
  6. Brzozowski, S. (1913). Pamiętnik. Lwów: Nakładem Antoniny Brzozowskiej, Księgarnia Polska. Reprint Drukarnia Narodowa w Krakowie (in my translation).Google Scholar
  7. Brzozowski, S. (1979). Aforyzmy. Warszawa: PIW.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, H. (1995). Religion of reason. Out of the sources of judaism (S. Kaplan, Trans.). Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  9. De Vries, H. (2005). Minimal theologies. Critiques of secular reason in Adorno and Levinas (G. Hale, Trans.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopnkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J. (2005). Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  11. Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Lectures on the philosophy of religion, vol. 3 (The consummate religion) (P. Hodgson, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Löwith, K. (1957). Meaning in history. The theological implications of the philosophy of history. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lukács, G. (1912). Von der Armut am Geiste. Neue Blätter, Heft nr 5/6 1912.Google Scholar
  14. Lukács, G. (1974). “Metaphysics of tragedy,” in Soul and Form. (A. Bostock, Trans.). London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rymkiewicz, J. M. (1987). Żmut. Paris: Instytut Literacki.Google Scholar
  16. Scholem, G. (1995). The Messianic idea in Judaism. And other essays on Jewish spirituality. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  17. Taubes, J. (2009). Occidental eschatology (D. Ratmoko, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Nottingham and Institute of Philosophy and Sociology at the Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations