Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Social Justice Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00389-0
“The original version of this article unfortunately contained a number of small typographical errors, and that have now been corrected with this erratum.”
-
Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new Gilded Age. Princeton University Press.
-
Blanden, J., Machin, S., & Rahman, S. (2019). Generation gap: Young Brits less likely to ‘do better’ than their parents. CentrePiece, 24, 24–26.
-
Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2015). Perceptions of U.S. social mobility are divided (and distorted) along ideological lines. Psychological Science, 26, 413–423.
-
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17–34). Blackwell.
-
Davis, A., Hecht, K., Burchardt, T., Gough, I., Hirsch, D., Rowlingson, K., & Summers, K. (2020). Living on different incomes in London: Can public consensus identify a ‘riches line’? Trust for London.
-
Edmiston, D. (2018). The poor “sociological imagination” of the rich: Explaining attitudinal divergence towards welfare, inequality, and redistribution. Social Policy and Administration, 52, 983–997.
-
Engelhardt, C., & Andreas, W. (2014). Biased perceptions of income inequality and redistribution. CESifo working paper series (Vol. 4838, pp. 1–23).
-
Hecht, K., & Kate, S. (2020). The long and short of it: The temporal significance of wealth and income. Social Policy & Administration, Online First, 1–15.
-
Hecht, K. (2021). It’s the value that we bring: Performance pay and top income earners’ perceptions of inequality.
-
Heuer, J.-O., Mau, S., & Zimmerman, K. (2018). Attitudes to inequality: Citizen deliberation about the (Re-)distribution of income and wealth in four welfare state regimes. In P. Taylor-Gooby & B. Leruth (Eds.), Attitudes, aspirations and welfare: Social policy directions in uncertain times (pp. 93–135). Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Karadja, M., Mollerstrom, J., & Seim, D. (2017). Richer (and holier) than though? The effect of relative income improvements on demands for redistribution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99, 201–212.
-
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (1995). Class and class conflict in six Western nations. American Sociological Review, 60, 1.
-
Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). How much should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 587–593.
-
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Poli
-
Margalit, Y. (2013). Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession. American Political Science Review, 107, 80–103.
-
McCall, L. (2013). The undeserving rich. American beliefs about inequality, opportunity, and redistribution. Cambridge University.
-
Mijs, J. J. B., & Hoy, C. (2021). How information about inequality impacts belief in meritocracy: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment in Australia, Indonesia and Mexico.
-
Mijs, J. J. B., & Roe, E. L. (2021). Is America coming apart? Socioeconomic segregation in neighbourhoods, schools, workplaces, and social networks, 1970–2020. Sociology Compass, Online First, 1–16.
-
Orton, M., & Rowlingson, K. (2007). Public attitudes to economic inequality. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
-
Rowlingson, K., & Connor, S. (2011). The ‘deserving’ rich? Inequality, morality and social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 437–434.
-
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to inequality in Twentieth Century England. University of California Press.
-
Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. Penguin.
-
Zimmermann, K., Heuer, J.-O., & Mau, S. (2018). Changing preferences towards redistribution: How deliberation shapes welfare attitudes. Social Policy and Administration, 52, 969–982.
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Summers, K., Accominotti, F., Burchardt, T. et al. Correction to: Deliberating Inequality: A Blueprint for Studying the Social Formation of Beliefs about Economic Inequality. Soc Just Res 35, 401–403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00400-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00400-8