Abstract
Scholars warn that neoliberalism erodes investment in the well-being of others by prizing the self-interested individual. To empirically investigate this claim, we surveyed 307 white, cisgender, heterosexual adult women across the US. First, we conducted a latent profile analysis using 6 indicators and identified 3 distinct sociopolitical profiles. In addition to typical Traditional and Progressive belief profiles, we observed one reflecting neoliberal ideology. Politically, women in the Neoliberal group held a centrist political orientation and relatively high neoliberal beliefs. Regarding social equality, they exhibited middling support for LGBTQ people and comparatively low gender equality beliefs. On interpersonal attitudes, they reported the lowest empathy as well as perspective-taking. Second, we examined the profiles’ associations with dedication to the welfare of others. Neoliberal-grouped women endorsed taking relatively low sociopolitical actions and were the least likely to donate money to marginalized women, while the most likely to keep it all for themselves. Although they held liberal attitudes toward their own sexual behavior, they imposed the highest sexual double standards on others and most strongly endorsed the use of others for one’s own sexual pleasure. Our findings reflect concerns that neoliberal ideology marks a departure from consideration of—and commitment to—others in both sociopolitical and personal domains. We discuss implications for social justice and welfare.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Adam, B. D. (2005). Constructing the neoliberal sexual actor: Responsibility and care of the self in the discourse of barebackers. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7(4), 333–346.
Adam, B. D. (2016). Neoliberalism, masculinity, and HIV risk. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 13(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0232-2
Adams, G., Estrada-Villalta, S., Sullivan, D., & Markus, H. R. (2019). The psychology of neoliberalism and the neoliberalism of psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12305
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 49–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310
Baber, K. M., & Tucker, C. J. (2006). The social roles questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles, 54(7), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Fitz, C. C., Alizaga, N. M., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the Neoliberal Beliefs Inventory. Journal of Social & Political Psychology, 3(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.366
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Zucker, A. N. (2007). Feminism between the sheets: The relation of feminist identity to sexual attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00349.x
Beattie, P., Bettache, K., & Chong, K. C. Y. (2019). Who is the neoliberal? Exploring neoliberal beliefs across east and west. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 20–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12309
Berlin, K. S., Williams, N. A., & Parra, G. R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst084
Bettache, K., Chiu, C. Y., & Beattie, P. (2020). The merciless mind in a dog-eat-dog society: Neoliberalism and the indifference to social inequality. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.002
Brown, W. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2003.0020
Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34(6), 690–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591706293016
Chapin, A. (2020). Of course white women voted for Trump again. The Cut. https://www.thecut.com/2020/11/many-white-women-still-voted-for-trump-in-2020.html
Coburn, D. (2000). Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: The role of neo-liberalism. Social Science & Medicine, 51(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00445-1
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 1–19.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronovo & D. D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175–194). Duke University Press.
Duncan, L. E., & Stewart, A. J. (2007). Personal political salience: The role of personality in collective identity and action. Political Psychology, 28(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00560.x
Dutt, A., & Kohfeldt, D. (2019). Assessing the relationship between neoliberal ideology and reactions to central American asylum seekers in the United States: Neoliberal ideology and reactions to asylum seekers. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12312
Elliott, S. (2014). “Who’s to blame?” constructing the responsible sexual agent in neoliberal sex education. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 11(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0158-5
Emmerink, P. M. J., van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., ter Bogt, T. F. M., & Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2017). A scale for the assessment of sexual standards among youth: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1699–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1001-x
Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2014). Technologies of sexiness: Sex, identity, and consumer culture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199914760.001.0001
Falco, A., & Gandhi, S. (2020). The rainbow business. Eidos, 9(1), 104–107.
Girerd, L., & Bonnot, V. (2020). Neoliberalism: An ideological barrier to feminist identification and collective action. Social Justice Research, 33(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00347-8
Grzanka, P. R., Miles, J. R., Spengler, E. S., Arnett, J. E., & Pruett, J. (2020). Measuring neoliberalism: Development and initial validation of a scale of anti-neoliberal attitudes. Social Justice Research, 33(1), 44–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00339-3
Harvey, D. (2016). Neoliberalism is a political project. Jacobin. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/07/david-harvey-neoliberalism-capitalism-labor-crisis-resistance/
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Reich, D. A. (2006). The brief sexual attitudes scale. The Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552301
Katz, J., Gravelin, C. R., & O’Brien, C. (2018). Neoliberal beliefs and perceptions of unintended adolescent pregnancy after consensual or forced sex. Sex Roles, 78(11–12), 810–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0842-z
Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62(5–6), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1
Lewis, H. (2020, August 19). The mythology of Karen. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/08/karen-meme-coronavirus/615355/
Mann, E. S., & Grzanka, P. R. (2018). Agency-Without-Choice: The visual rhetorics of long-acting reversible contraception promotion. Symbolic Interaction, 41(3), 334–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.349
Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2017). Partisan differences in nonpartisan activity: The case of charitable giving. Political Behavior, 39(4), 839–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9382-4
Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., Carlquist, E., Phelps, J. M., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2009). Globalization, neo-liberalism and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(1–2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9216-6
Ng, E. (2013). A “post-gay” era? Media gaystreaming, homonormativity, and the politics of LGBT integration. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12013
Peacock, M., Bissell, P., & Owen, J. (2014). Dependency denied: Health inequalities in the neo-liberal era. Social Science & Medicine, 118, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.006
Proulx, T., Costin, V., Magazin, E., Zarzeczna, N., & Haddock, G. (2022). The progressive values scale: Assessing the ideological schism on the left. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221097529
Rutherford, A. (2018). Feminism, psychology, and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194
Savani, K., Stephens, N. M., & Markus, H. R. (2011). The unanticipated interpersonal and societal consequences of choice: Victim blaming and reduced support for the public good. Psychological Science, 22(6), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611407928
Siconolfi, D. E., Halkitis, P. N., & Moeller, R. W. (2015). Homo economicus: Young gay and bisexual men and the new public health. Critical Public Health, 25(5), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.906565
Solnit, R. (2021). Republicans seethe with violence and lies. Texas is part of a bigger war they’re waging. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/sep/03/republicans-texas-abortion-right-democracy?fbclid=IwAR3x6kpBaLu5n_bKSh4vjbiUi9BMdEgPy9DemBOhLDTAwRuwJddBnDvpOec
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
Sweet, E. (2018). “Like you failed at life”: Debt, health and neoliberal subjectivity. Social Science & Medicine, 212, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.017
Tein, J., Coxe, S., & Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 20(4), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781
Teo, T. (2018). Homo neoliberalus: From personality to forms of subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318794899
Thatcher, M. (1987). Interview for Woman’s Own (“no such thing as society”). Margaret Thatcher Foundation. https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106689
Tronto, J. (2017). There is an alternative: Homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788217X14866281687583
Whittier, N. (2014). Rethinking coalitions: Anti-pornography feminists, conservatives, and relationships between collaborative adversarial movements. Social Problems, 61(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2014.12151
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Winter, D. G., Torges, C. M., Stewart, A. J., Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2006). Pathways toward the third age: Studying a cohort from the Golden Age. Annual Review of Gerontology & Geriatrics, 26 (1), 103–126
Woodford, M. R., Silverschanz, P., Swank, E., Scherrer, K. S., & Raiz, L. (2012). Predictors of heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward LGBT people. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(4), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2012.716697
Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2021). Me first: The relation between neoliberal beliefs and sexual attitudes. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 18, 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00466-6
Funding
This study was funded by the Vada A. Yeomans endowment at the University of Florida Foundation and a Charles T. Woods faculty grant from the University of Florida Center for Gender, Sexualities, and Women’s Studies Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the University of Florida Human Research Ethics committee (IRB# IRB202001991).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ginn, H.G., Brown, H.L.P., Bay-Cheng, L.Y. et al. Distinctly Neoliberal: A Latent Profile Analysis of Neoliberal Ideology and Its Associations with Sociopolitical Actions and Sexual Attitudes. Soc Just Res 35, 275–295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00397-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00397-0
Keywords
- Latent profile analysis
- Neoliberalism
- Majoritized women
- Equality attitudes
- Sexual attitudes
- Sociopolitical action