Abstract
Longevity bias is the tendency to assume that longstanding states of the world are better and more right than their more recent (but otherwise identical) counterparts. In the current study, we take an individual differences approach by directly measuring people’s endorsements of the assumptions underlying longevity bias and consider several downstream implications of this bias for the perpetuation and maintenance of inequality. Specifically, we test the idea that the assumptions underlying longevity bias correspond with intrinsic explanations for social inequality, the justification of inequality as good and right, and thus prevent or subdue moral outrage and reduce motivation for meaningful social change. Our findings indicate that people vary in their susceptibility to conflate longevity of existence with goodness and rightness, individual variation in longevity bias predicts explanations for and the perceived legitimacy of social inequality, and this translates into psychological barriers for enacting social change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Material
Study materials and data are available via Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/d6xsj/?view_only=3df63c2a883844ab9c4f0421dd612703.
References
Allison, S. T., Mackie, D. M., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Outcome biases in social perception: Implications for dispositional inference, attitude change, stereotyping, and social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 28. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Altemeyer, R. A. (1988). Enemies of freedom. Jossey-Bass.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). Amos (Version 21.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.
Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 15–31.
Blanchar, J. C., & Eidelman, S. (2013). Perceived system longevity increases system justification and the legitimization of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 238–245.
Blanchar, J. C., & Sparkman, D. J. (2020). Individual differences in miserly thinking predict endorsement of racial/ethnic stereotypes. Social Cognition, 38, 405–421.
Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2014). To love or hate thy neighbor: The role of core motives in explaining the link between fundamentalism and racial prejudice. Political Psychology, 35, 207–223.
Brown, M. J., & Gladstone, N. (2012). Development of a short version of the gender role beliefs scale. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 154–158.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
Cimpian, A., & Salomon, E. (2014). The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 461–480.
Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research and Politics, 2, 1–9.
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). Morality items on the 1985 pilot study, ANES pilot study report, no. nes002251. Retrieved from the American National Election Studies’ webpage: http://www.electionstudies.org/Library/papers/documents/nes002251.pdf
Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S., Skitka, L., & Morgan, G. S. (2009). Status quo framing increases support for torture. Social Influence, 4, 1–10.
Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Taylor & Francis: Philadelphia, PA.
Eibach, R. P., & Keegan, T. (2006). Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and white and black Americans’ differing assessments of racial progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 453–467.
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 270–281.
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2014). The intuitive traditionalist: How biases for existence and longevity promote the status quo. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 53–104). Academic Press.
Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S., & Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765–775.
Eidelman, S., Pattershall, J., & Crandall, C. S. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 993–998.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
Fletcher, G. J. O., Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875–884.
Frank, T. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas. Metropolitan Books.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.
Grusky, D. B., & Hill, J. (2018). Inequality in the 21st century. Taylor & Francis.
Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2015). An early-emerging explanatory heuristic promotes support for the status quo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 739–752.
Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018a). Investigating the origins of political views: Biases in explanation predict conservative attitudes in children and adults. Developmental Science, 21, e12567.
Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018b). Memory accessibility shapes explanation: Testing key claims of the inherence heuristic account. Memory & Cognition, 46, 68–88.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (Eds.). (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
Jost, J. T., Hennes, E. P., & Lavine, H. (2013). "Hot" political cognition: Its self-, group-, and system-serving purposes. In D. E. Carlston (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of social cognition (p. 851–875). Oxford University Press.
Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99–108.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.
Kay, A., Gaucher, D., Peach, J., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434.
Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. General Learning Press.
Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Aldine de Gruyter.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum.
McCabe, S., Spina, M. R., & Arndt, J. (2016). When existence is not futile: The influence of mortality salience on the longer-is-better effect. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 600–611.
Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary political psychology: On the origin and structure of heuristics and biases in politics. Advances in Political Psychology, 36, 45–78.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press.
Salerno, J. M., & Peter-Hagene, L. C. (2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24, 2069–2078.
Salomon, E., & Cimpian, A. (2014). The inherence heuristic as a source of essentialist thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1297–1315.
Shockley, E., Rosen, R. K., & Rios, K. (2016). Change resistance moderates existence and longevity biases. Social Influence, 11, 87–100.
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Mullen, E. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743–756.
Smith, A. (1776/1993). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perception so causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439–445.
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.
Tworek, C. M., & Cimpian, A. (2016). Why do people tend to infer “ought” from “is”? The role of biases in explanation. Psychological Science, 27, 1109–1122.
Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 28. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 378–388.
Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.
Warner, R. H., & Kiddoo, K. L. (2014). Are the latter-day saints too later day? Perceived age of the Mormon Church and attitudes toward Mormons. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 67–78.
Weiner, B., Osborne, D., & Rudolph, U. (2011). An attributional analysis of responses to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 199–213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blanchar, J.C., Eidelman, S. Implications of Longevity Bias for Explaining, Evaluating, and Responding to Social Inequality. Soc Just Res 34, 1–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00364-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00364-1