Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 152–181 | Cite as

The Social Value of Expressing Personal and General Belief in a Just World in Different Contexts

  • Hélder V. Alves
  • Bernard Gangloff
  • Sören Umlauft
Article
  • 180 Downloads

Abstract

Research conducted in France and Portugal has consistently found that expressing high versus low Belief in a Personal Just World (BJW-P) is more socially valued. Results concerning the Belief in a General Just World (BJW-G) have been mixed. We propose this reflects a higher resistance of BJW-P social value to contextual changes. Testing this idea was the main goal of three experimental studies conducted in France, Germany and Portugal. In Study 1 (N = 283) participants expressed higher BJW-G when asked to convey a positive versus a negative image in a job application at a bank. The opposite pattern showed up when they applied for a job at a Human Rights NGO, an employment assistance institution and a trade union. Participants expressed higher BJW-P in all contexts, except at the trade union (no significant differences). In Study 2 (N = 489) participants judged bogus candidates who expressed high or low BJW-P/G while applying for a job at the same contexts. The patterns of judgments replicated those of self-presentations in Study 1. In Study 3 (N = 158), participants were asked to judge targets who expressed high versus moderate versus low BJW-P at a trade union. The former target was more socially valued than the other two. High versus low BJW-P expression was associated with higher stamina and less unadjusted self-enhancement. We conclude that in Western societies the expression of BJW-P is more central to the legitimation of the status quo and that of BJW-G is more context sensitive.

Keywords

Belief in a just world Context Social value Self-presentation Judgment norms 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Abarri, L., Gangloff, B., & Fares, R. (2016). L’orientation à la dominance sociale comme facteur amplificateur de la croyance en un monde juste et de l’allégeance en milieu organisationnel [Social domination orientation as an amplifier of the belief in a just world and allegiance in the organizationa. In V. Majer, P. Salengros, A. Di Fabio, & C. Lemoine (Eds.), Facteurs de la santé au travail : Du mal-être au bien-être (pp. 221–231). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  2. Alves, H. V., Breyner, M. M., Nunes, S. F., Pereira, B. D., Silva, L. F., & Soares, J. G. (2015). Are victims also judged more positively if they say their lives are just? Psicologia, 29, 71–80.  https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v29i2.1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves, H., & Correia, I. (2008). On the normative of expressing the belief in a just world: Empirical evidence. Social Justice Research, 21, 106–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0060-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alves, H., & Correia, I. (2010a). Personal and general belief in a just world as judgement norms. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 221–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590903281120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Alves, H., & Correia, I. (2010b). The strategic expression of personal belief in a just world. European Psychologist, 15, 202–210.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alves, H., & Correia, I. (2013). The buffering-boosting hypothesis of the expression of general and personal belief in a just world for successes and failures. Social Psychology, 44, 390–397.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacharach, B., & Sager, C. B. (1982). That’s what friends are for [Recorded by Rod Stewart]. On Night shift soundtrack (record). Warner Bros.Google Scholar
  8. Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Fitz, C. C., Alizaga, N. M., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the neoliberal beliefs inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 71–88.  https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beauvois, J.-L., & Dépret, E. (2008). What about social value? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 493–500.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bègue, L., & Bastounis, M. (2003). Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71, 435–463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7103007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett, R., & Kottasz, R. (2012). Public attitudes towards the UK banking industry following the global financial crisis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30, 128–147.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321211210877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., Harvey, A. J., & Dawtry, R. J. (2014). Immanent justice reasoning: Theory, research, and current directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 105–161). London: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00002-0.
  13. Cambon, L. (2006). Désirabilité sociale et utilité sociale, deux dimensions de la valeur communiquée par les adjectifs de personnalité [Social desirability and social utility, two dimensions of value communicated by personality adjectives]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 19, 125–151.Google Scholar
  14. Cichocka, A., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Stripped of illusions? Exploring system justification processes in capitalist and post-Communist societies. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 6–29.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2001). The effects of belief in a just world and victim’s innocence on secondary victimization, justice and victim’s deservingness. Social Justice Research, 14, 327–342.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014324125095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79–98.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an die gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierung zweier Skalen [The belief in a just world as a motive: Validation of two scales]. Psychologische Beitrage, 29, 596–615.Google Scholar
  18. de Gaulejac, V. (2005). La societé malade de la gestion: Idéologie gestionnaire, pouvoir managérial et harcèlement social [The sick society of management: Managerial ideology, managerial power and social harassment]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  19. Deconchy, J.-P. (2011). Croyances et idéologies. Systèmes de représentations, traitement de l’information sociale, mécanismes cognitifs [Beliefs and ideologies. Systems of representations social information processing, cognitive mechanismes]. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie Sociale (pp. 335–362). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  20. Dittmar, H., & Dickinson, J. (1993). The perceived relationship between the belief in a just world and sociopolitical ideology. Social Justice Research, 6, 257–272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dubois, N. (1994). La norme d’internalité et le libéralisme [The norm of internality and liberalism]. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  22. Dubois, N. (2000). Self-presentation strategies and social judgments—desirability and social utility of causal explanations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59, 170–182.  https://doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.59.3.170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dubois, N. (2005). Normes sociales de jugement et valeur: Ancrage sur l’utilité et ancrage sur la désirabilité [Social judgment norms and value: Anchorage on utility and anchorage on desirability]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18, 43–79.Google Scholar
  24. Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2003). Some bases for a sociocognitive approach to judgement norms. In N. Dubois (Ed.), A sociocognitive approach to social norms. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duchon, C., & Gangloff, B. (2008). Clairvoyance normative de la croyance en un monde juste: Une étude sur des chômeurs [Belief in a just world normative clearsightedness: A study with unemployed individuals]. Proceedings of the 14ème Congrès de Psychologie du Travail de Langue Française, (Vol. 4, pp. 113–122) (Hammamet, Tunisia, 2006).Google Scholar
  27. Dzuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2002). Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: The impact of belief in a just world. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 732–757.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00240.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dzuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2007). Teachers’ well-being and the belief in a just world. European Psychologist, 12, 253–260.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gangloff, B. (2008). Normativité de la croyance en un monde juste via le “paradigme du législateur”: une étude sur des recruteurs [Normativeness of the belief in a just world via the “legislator paradigm”]. Proceedings of the 14ème Congrès de Psychologie du Travail de Langue Française, (Vol. 4, pp. 103–112) (Hammamet, Tunisia, 2006).Google Scholar
  32. Gangloff, B., Abdellaoui, S., & Personnaz, B. (2007). De quelques variables modulatrices des relations entre croyance en un monde juste, internalité et allégeance : Une étude sur des chômeurs [On some modulating variables in the relationship between the belief in a just world, internality and allegeance]. Les Cahiers de Psychologie Politique, 11. Retrieved from http://lodel.irevues.inist.fr/cahierspsychologiepolitique/index.php?id=559.
  33. Gangloff, B., & Duchon, C. (2010). La croyance en un monde du travail juste et sa valorisation sociale perçue [The belief in a just working world and its perceived social valuation]. Humanisme et Enterprise, 248, 51–64.Google Scholar
  34. Gangloff, B., & Mazilescu, C.-A. (2015). Is it desirable or useful to believe in a just world? Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 51, 150–161.Google Scholar
  35. Gangloff, B., Soudan, C., & Auzoult, L. (2014). Normative characteristics of the just world belief: A review with four scales. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 163–174.Google Scholar
  36. Gilibert, D., & Cambon, L. (2003). Paradigms of the sociocognitive approach. In N. Dubois (Ed.), A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 38–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  38. Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hafer, C. L., & Sutton, R. M. (2016). Belief in a just world. In M. Schmitt & C. Sabbagh (Eds.), The justice motive: History, theory, and research. Handbook of social justice theory and research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Holtgraves, T., & Srull, T. K. (1989). The effects of positive self-descriptions on impressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 452–462.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289153014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iatridis, T., & Fousiani, K. (2009). Effects of status and outcome on attributions and just-world beliefs: How the social distribution of success and failure may be rationalized. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 415–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jellison, J. M., & Green, J. (1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 643–649.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jose, P. E. (1990). Just-World reasoning in children’s immanent justice judgments. Child Development, 61, 1024–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02839.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecendents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2006). A social psychological perspective on perceiving and reporting discrimination. Law and Social Inquiry, 31, 801–830.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00036.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khera, M. L. K., Harvey, A. J., & Callan, M. J. (2014). Beliefs in a just world, subjective well-being and attitudes towards refugees among refugee workers. Social Justice Research, 27, 432–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0220-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. (1981). Beliefs about stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 29–56.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.000333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Madison, Wisconsin: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
  50. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023562.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lima-Nunes, A., Pereira, C. R., & Correia, I. (2013). Restricting the scope of justice to justify discrimination: The role played by justice perceptions in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 627–636.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296227002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meyer, E. (2014). The culture map : Breaking through the invisible boundaries of global business. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  56. Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Otto, K., & Schmidt, S. (2007). Compensatory effects of belief in a just world. European Psychologist, 12, 272–282.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Pirlott, A. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Ratner, R. K., & Miller, D. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 5–16.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Roca, B. (2016). The role of social networks in trade union recruitment: The case study of a radical union in Spain. Global Labour Journal.  https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v7i1.2354.Google Scholar
  62. Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00997.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soudan, C., & Gangloff, B. (2013). Croyance en un monde juste et réactions aux injustices professionnelles [Belief in a just world and reactions to professional injustice]. Carréologie, 13, 137–155.Google Scholar
  64. Stevens, C. K., & Kristof, A. L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 587–606.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Wilkin, K., Elder, T. J., Cole, J. M., & Stathi, S. (2008). Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 528–541.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312526.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Testé, B., Maisonneuve, C., Assilaméhou, Y., & Perrin, S. (2012). What is an “appropriate” migrant? Impact of the adoption of meritocratic worldviews by potential newcomers on their perceived ability to integrate into a Western society. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 263–368.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Testé, B., & Perrin, S. (2013). The impact of endorsing the belief in a just world on social judgments: The social utility and social desirability of just-world beliefs for self and for others. Social Psychology, 44, 209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van den Bos, K., & Maas, M. (2009). On the psychology of the belief in a just world: Exploring experiential and rationalistic paths to victim blaming. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1567–1578.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209344628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H. (2008). Stress and justice in organizations: An exploration into justice processes with the aim to find mechanisms to reduce stress in justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace, from theory to practice (pp. 27–48). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  71. Wu, M. S., Yan, X., Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Li, J., Zhu, Z., et al. (2011). General belief in a just world and resilience: Evidence from a collectivistic culture. European Journal of Personality, 25, 431–442.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (CIS-IUL)Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)LisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Laboratoire Parisien de Psychologie SocialeUniversité Paris 10ParisFrance
  3. 3.Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Pädagogik Arbeitsbereich Pädagogische PsychologieHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations