Russian Adaptations of General and Personal Belief in a Just World Scales: Validation and Psychometric Properties
- 27 Downloads
In a questionnaire study, Russian versions of the General and Personal belief in a just world (BJW) Scales were validated. Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the Personal BJW Scale could be empirically differentiated from the General BJW Scale; however, both scales correlated positively. Good internal consistencies of both scales were demonstrated. Age was positively correlated with personal BJW but not with general BJW. Gender differences were found neither in personal nor in general BJW. Personal BJW was found to be stronger than general BJW. Convergent validity was tested by inspecting correlations of BJW scales with the Basic World Assumptions Scale. Divergent validity was examined by inspecting correlations with Markers for the Big Five Factor Structure Scale and Justice Sensitivity Scales. Both personal and general BJW showed positive connections with all subscales of the Basic World Assumptions Scale (self-worth, benevolence of world, justice, luck, and control). We demonstrated divergent validity of personal BJW regarding intellect, agreeableness, conscientiousness, beneficiary and perpetrator sensitivity, and divergent validity of general BJW regarding intellect, beneficiary, perpetrator, and observer sensitivity. Both BJW dimensions were unrelated to beneficiary and perpetrator sensitivity. In addition, general BJW was not related to observer sensitivity. Results give evidence for satisfactory psychometric properties and validation of the Russian versions of BJW scales.
KeywordsBelief in a just world Personality psychology Five Factor model World assumptions Justice sensitivity Culture Validation
We are very grateful to Prof. Dr. Claudia Dalbert for her kind permission to use BJW scale in Russia; to Prof. Dr. Manfred Schmitt for the chance to get high professional advice and always fruitful discussion; to Dr. Michael Wu for giving experience of common research on justice psychology. We also express our gratitude to the volunteers who took part in our study. This research was partially supported by Russian Foundation for the Humanities (Project 15-36-01233 by N. Astanina) and by Russian Science Foundation (Project 14-18-02163 by S. Nartova-Bochaver).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- Bollmann, G., Krings, F., Maggiori, C., & Rossier, J. (2015). Differential associations of personal and general just-world beliefs with the five-factor and the HEXACO models of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dalbert, C. (2009). Belief in a just world. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 288–297). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen [Belief in a just world: Validation correlates of two scales]. Psychologische Beiträge, 29(4), 596–615.Google Scholar
- Drovnina, E. G. (2014). Adaptacija oprosnika “Lichnaja vera v spravedlivyj mir” C. Dalbert [Adaptation of the questionnaire “Personal Belief in a Just World” by C. Dalbert]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 1(2), 79–83.Google Scholar
- Dzuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2002). Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: The impact of belief in a just world. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 732–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00240.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fatima, I. (2016). Personal belief in a just world and self-compassion as predictors of body appreciation in individuals with amputation using and not using prosthesis. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 22(2), 109–114.Google Scholar
- Fatima, I., & Khalid, R. (2007). Some aspects of reliability and validity of beliefs in a just world questionnaire. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 15–24.Google Scholar
- Fürntratt, E. (1969). Zur Bestimmung der Anzahl interpretierbarer gemeinsamer Faktoren in Faktorenanalysen psychologischer Daten [On the identifying the number of interpretable general factors in factor analyses of psychological data]. Diagnostica, 15, 62–75.Google Scholar
- Göregenli, M. (2003). Şiddet, kötü muamele ve işkenceye ilişkin değerlendirmeler, tutumlar ve deneyimler [Assessments, attitudes, and experiences related to violence, maltreatment, and torture]. İzmir: İşkencenin Onlenmesinde Hukukcuların Rolu Projesi Raporu.Google Scholar
- Gulevich, O. A. (2011). Social’naja psihologija spravedlivosti [Social psychology of justice]. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.Google Scholar
- Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions—Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Johnston, C. S., Krings, F., Maggiori, C., Meier, L. L., & Fiori, M. (2016). Believing in a personal just world helps maintain well-being at work by coloring organizational justice perceptions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1192132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knyazev, G. G., Mitrofanova, L. G., & Bocharov, V. A. (2010). Validizacija russkojazychnoj versii oprosnika L. Goldberga « Markery faktorov „Bol’shoj Pjaterki “» [Validization of Russian version of Goldberg’s “Big-Five factor markers” inventory]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 31(5), 100–110.Google Scholar
- Lipatov, A. A., Kuprejchenko, A. B., Gromova, A. I., & Shrader, H. (2015). Pravil’noe obshhestvo [Right society]. Saint Petersburg: Piter.Google Scholar
- Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., & Astanina, N. B. (2012). Individual differences in Russian adults’ justice sensitivity. Paper presented at the 16th European conference on personality psychology, Trieste, Italy.Google Scholar
- Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., & Astanina, N. B. (2013). Psihologicheskie problemy spravedlivosti v zarubezhnoj personologii: teorii i jempiricheskie issledovanija. [Theories and empirical research on justice in the foreign personality psychology]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 35(1), 16–32.Google Scholar
- Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Hohlova, A. J., & Podlipnyak, M. B. (2013). Vera v spravedlivyj mir i psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie u gluhih i slyshashhih podrostkov i vzroslyh. [Belief in a Just world and mental well-being in deaf and hearing youth and adults]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial’naia psikhologiia, 2(3). http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyclin/2013/n3/Nartova_Bochaver_et_al.shtml. Accessed 4 January 2017.
- Nesterova, M., Ignatjeva, S., & Ruza, A. (2015). Adaptation in Latvia of scales of personal and general belief in a just world. Social Sciences Bulletin, 1(20), 76–86.Google Scholar
- Padun, M. A., & Kotel’nikova, A. V. (2008). Modifikacija metodiki issledovanija bazisnyh ubezhdenij lichnosti R. Janoff-Bul’man. [Modification of R. Janoff-Bulman’s measure of the personal basic assumptions]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 29(4), 98–106.Google Scholar
- Robinson, O. C., Lopez, F. G., Ramos, K., & Nartova-Bochaver, S. (2013). Authenticity, social context, and well-being in the United States, England, and Russia: A three country comparative analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmitt, M., & Baumert, A. (2016). Justice Sensitivity. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 161–180). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmitt, M., Dalbert, C., Montada, L., Gschwendner, T., Maes, J., Reichle, B., et al. (2008). Verteilung des Glaubens an eine gerechte Welt in der Allgemeinbevölkerung: Normwerte für die Skala Allgemeiner Gerechte-Welt-Glaube [Distribution of belief in a just world in the general population: Standard values of the General Belief in a Just World Scale]. Diagnostica, 54(3), 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silver, K. E., Karakurt, G., & Boysen, S. T. (2015). Predicting prosocial behavior toward sex-trafficked persons: The roles of empathy, belief in a just world, and attitudes toward prostitution. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 24(8), 932–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1070231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sutton, R. M., Calogero, R. M., & Bardi, A. (2012). A certain kind of just-world belief: The epistemic purpose of believing life treats other people fairly. Paper presented at the 16th European conference on personality psychology, Trieste, Italy.Google Scholar