Contributive Justice: An Exploration of a Wider Provision of Meaningful Work
Extreme inequality of opportunity leads to a number of social tensions, inefficiencies and injustices. One issue of increasing concern is the effect inequality is having on people’s fair chances of attaining meaningful work, thus limiting opportunities to make a significant positive contribution to society and reducing the chances of living a flourishing life and developing their potential. On a global scale, we can observe an increasingly uneven provision of meaningful work, raising a series of ethical concerns that need detailed examination. The aim of this article is to explore the potential of a normative framework based upon the idea of contributive justice to defend a fairer provision of meaningful work.
KeywordsLabour conditions Capabilities Deskilling Human flourishing Social justice Knowledge economy Poverty
I would like to thank the participants at workshops in Mexico City, Budapest and Campinas, Isabella Trifan, Georges Félix, the journal’s editor and the anonymous reviewers for valuable feedback and Michael Pockley also for careful language editing on earlier versions of this article.
This study was funded by a postdoctoral fellowship UNAM-DGAPA [National Autonomous University of Mexico, no grant numbers are given] and a postdoctoral fellowship by FONDECYT/CONICYT No. 3170068.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
- Arneson, R. (2015). Equality of opportunity. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition).Google Scholar
- Barry, B. (1982). Humanity and justice in global perspective. Nomos, 24, 219–252.Google Scholar
- Bascara, R. (2016). Compatriot partiality and cosmopolitan justice: Can we justify compatriot partiality within the cosmopolitan framework? Etikk i praksis-Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 10(2), 27–39.Google Scholar
- Britz, J. J. (2008). Making the global information society good: A social justice perspective on the ethical dimensions of the global information society. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1171–1183.Google Scholar
- Campesina, Via. (1996). The right to produce and access land. Rome: Via Campesina.Google Scholar
- Dieterlen, P. (2003). La pobreza: un estudio filosófico. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
- Gilabert, P. (forthcoming). Dignity at work. In H. Collins, G. Lester, & V. Mantouvlou (Eds.), Philosophical foundations of labour law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Graeber, D. (2013). On the phenomenon of bullshit jobs. Strike! Magazine, August (pp. 10–11).Google Scholar
- Keat, R. (2009). Anti-perfectionism, market economies and the right to meaningful work. Analyse & Kritik, 31(1), 121–138.Google Scholar
- Kumar, M., & Santoro, D. (2014). Being bound to fail. How epistemic injustice fails educational opportunities. https://imera.univ-amu.fr/sites/imera.univamu.fr/file/being_bound_to_fail.how_epistemic_injustice_fails_educational_opportunities_draft_0.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.
- Lamont, J., & Favor, C. (2013). Distributive Justice. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2013 edition). Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Louwaars, N. (2007). Seeds of confusion: The impact of policies on seed systems. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Universiteit.Google Scholar
- Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Parr, T. (2015). From philanthropy to philanthropists. In B. Morvaridi (Ed.), New philanthropy and social justice: Debating the conceptual and policy discourse (pp. 64–77). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Pogge, T. W. (2008). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. edn.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Robeyns, I. (2011). The capability approach. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2011 edition). Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Schweiger, G. (2013). Recognition and social exclusion. A recognition-theoretical exploration of poverty in Europe. Ethical Perspectives, 20(4), 529–554.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Shaheed, F. (2012). Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights. United Nations (A/HRC/20/26).Google Scholar
- Shaver, L. (2010). The right to science and culture. Wisconsin Law Review, 121, 121–184.Google Scholar
- Shiffrin, S. V. (2003). Race, labor, and the fair equality of opportunity principle. Fordham Law Review, 72, 1643–1675.Google Scholar
- Sison, A. J. G., Ferrero, I., & Guitián, G. (2016). Human dignity and the dignity of work: Insights from Catholic Social Teaching. Business Ethics Quarterly.Google Scholar
- Steger, M. F. (2017). Creating meaning and purpose at work. In: The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of positivity and strengths-based approaches at work (pp. 60–81). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–74). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- United States Catholic Bishops. (1997). Economic justice for all: Pastoral letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. economy. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.Google Scholar
- Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Wolf, S. (2010). Meaning in life and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Ziegler, J. (2011a). Destruction massive: Géopolitique de la faim. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
- Ziegler, R. (2011b). Fair competition of ideas. Paper presented at the responsible innovation conference, The Hague, April 18–19, 2011.Google Scholar
- Timmermann, C., & van den Belt, H. (2012). Global justice considerations for a proposed “climate impact fund”. Public Reason, 4(1–2), 182–196.Google Scholar