Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing Relative Deprivation in Relation to Deservingness, Entitlement and Resentment

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article relates relative deprivation (RD) theory to a program of research that began with studies of observers’ judgments of “tall poppies” or high-status people and that subsequently focused on perceived deservingness and its relation to discrete emotions. The article reviews early and more recent research from this program and its theoretical basis. The author proposes some implications for RD theory that include a more detailed consideration of how deservingness and entitlement might affect RD at the individual and group levels; how resentment relates to perceived deservingness; how other discrete emotions might blend with resentment; how the analysis could be extended to relative advantage; how to account for the role of envy; and the need to develop a motivational analysis for the link between RD and possible outcomes of RD such as collective action. The author concludes that ideas from deservingness theory have much to offer future developments in RD theory and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckmann, R. J., & Feather, N. T. (2007). Gender, discrimination beliefs, group-based guilt, and responses to affirmative action for Australian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 290–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egotistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22, 280–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity and relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 239–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (Ed.). (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1989). Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 239–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1990). Reactions to equal reward allocations: Effects of situation, gender and values. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1992a). An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1992b). Values, valences, expectations, and actions. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1993). The rise and fall of political leaders: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–73). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996a). Domestic violence, gender and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35, 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996b). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996c). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215–251). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1998a). Attitudes toward high achievers, self-esteem, and value priorities for Australian, American and Canadian Students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1998b). Reactions to penalties committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2002a). Deservingness, entitlement, and reactions to outcomes. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 334–349). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2002b). Reactions to supporters of uranium mining in relation to status, attitude similarity, and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1464–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2003). Distinguishing between deservingness and entitlement: Earned outcomes versus lawful outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 38–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2008a). Effects of observer’s own status on reactions to do a high achiever’s failure: Deservingness, resentment, schadenfreude and sympathy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2008b). Perceived legitimacy of a promotion decision in relation to deservingness, entitlement, and resentment in the context of affirmative action and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1230–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2012). Tall poppies, deservingness and schadenfreude. The Psychologist, 25, 434–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2014). Deservingness and schadenfreude. In W. van Dijk & J. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others (pp. 29–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Adair, J. G (1999). National identity, national favoritism, global self-esteem, tall poppy attitudes, and value priorities in Australian and Canadian samples. In J.-C. Lasry, J. G. Adair, & K. Dion (Eds.), Latest contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 42–61). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

  • Feather, N. T., Boeckman, R. J., & McKee, I. R. (2001a). Reactions to an offence in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Boeckmann, R. J. (2007). Beliefs about gender discrimination in the workplace in the context of affirmative action: Effects of gender and ambivalent attitudes in an Australian sample. Sex Roles, 57, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., Boeckmann, R. J., & McKee, I. R. (2001b). Jail sentence, community service, or compensation: Predicting reactions to a serious corporate offence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Dawson, S. (1998). Judging deserving and affect in relation to another’s employment or unemployment: A test of a justice model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Deverson, N. H. (2000). Reactions to a motor-vehicle accident in relation to mitigating circumstances and the gender and moral worth of the driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Johnstone, C. (2001). Social norms, entitlement, and deservingness: Differential reactions to aggressive behaviour of schizophrenic and personality disorder patients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 755–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (1993). Global self-esteem and attitudes toward the high achiever for Australian and Japanese students. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2014). Deservingness, liking relations, schadenfreude, and other discrete emotions in the context of the outcomes of plagiarism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., McKee, I. R., & Bekker, N. (2011). Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Nairn, K. (2005). Resentment, envy, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Effects of own and other’s deserved or undeserved status. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Newton, J. W. (1982). Values, expectations, and the prediction of social action: An expectancy-valence analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 953–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Souter, J. (2002). Reactions to mandatory sentences in relation to ethnic identity and criminal history of the offender. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 417–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., Volkmer, R. E., & McKee, I. R. (1991). Attitudes towards high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., Wenzel, M., & McKee, I. R. (2013). Integrating multiple perspectives on Schadenfreude: The role of deservingness and emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 574–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., Woodyatt, L., & McKee, I. R. (2012). Predicting support for social actions: How values, justice-related variables, discrete emotions, and outcome expectations influence support for the Stolen Generations. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 516–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical and policy perspectives (pp. 183–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. (1976). Rational choice and social exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsonn, K. (2006). Justice and desert-based emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciousness of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21, 138–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1976). Social justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. M., Herman, C. P., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.). (1986). Relative deprivation and social comparison. The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. R. (1967). Social evaluation theory. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 241–311). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal determinants of emotion: Theory, methods, and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G. (1987). Desert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J. (2002). Thinking about deservingness. Social Justice Research, 15, 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core related themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 295–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 203–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and fairness in marriage. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 229–258). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherwell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hirsch, A. (1986). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Boston: North-Eastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.). (2002) Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. C., & Tropp, L. R. (2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 200–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia

    N. T. Feather

Authors
  1. N. T. Feather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. T. Feather.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feather, N.T. Analyzing Relative Deprivation in Relation to Deservingness, Entitlement and Resentment. Soc Just Res 28, 7–26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0235-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0235-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation