Social Justice Research

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 256–276 | Cite as

Fairness in Non-human Primates?

Article

Abstract

Humans have a sense of fairness, i.e. an interest in the ideal of equity. This sense allows them to compare their own efforts and subsequent outcomes with those of others, and thus to evaluate and react to inequity. The question is whether our closest living relatives, the non-human primates, show the behavioural characteristics that might qualify as necessary components to a sense of fairness, such as inequity aversion. In this article, we review the five different experimental approaches to studying behaviours related to fairness in non-human primates, including their underlying logic and main findings that represent the current state of research in this field. In the critical condition of all these studies, a subject and a conspecific partner have either to invest different efforts or receive different outcomes while observing each other. The main question is whether—and how—subjects react to unequal situations that humans would perceive as ‘unfair’. Taken together, the results from all five approaches provide only weak evidence for a sense of fairness in non-human primates. Although apes and monkeys are attentive to what the partner is getting, they do not seem to be able or motivated to compare their own efforts and outcomes with those of others at a human level. Even though the debate is still on-going, we believe that a full sense of fairness is not essential for cooperation. Obviously, apes and monkeys are capable of solving problems cooperatively, without a strong, humanlike sense of fairness. They are mainly interested in maximizing their own benefit, regardless of what others may receive. It is thus possible that a sense of fairness only exists rudimentarily in non-human primates.

Keywords

Animal cognition Inequity aversion 

References

  1. Addessi, E., Mancini, A., Crescimbene, L., & Visalberghi, E. (2011). How social context, token value, and time course affect token exchange in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). International Journal of Primatology, 32, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boesch, C. (1994). Cooperative hunting in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 48(3), 653–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesch, C., & Boesch, H. (1989). Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park Ivory Coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78(4), 547–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boesch, C., & Boesch-Achermann, H. (2000). The chimpanzees of the Tai Forest. Oxford: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bräuer, J., & Call, J. (2011). The magic cup: Great apes and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) individuate objects according to their properties. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125(3), 353–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Are apes really inequity averse? Proceedings of Royal Society London, 273, 3123–3128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Are apes inequity averse? New data on the token-exchange paradigm. American Journal of Primatology, 71(2), 175–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2004a). A concept of value during experimental exchange in brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Folia Primatologica, 75(5), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2004b). Socially learned preferences for differentially rewarded tokens in the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118(2), 133–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2005). Responses to a simple barter task in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Primates, 46(3), 173–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2006). Partial support from a nonreplication: Comment on Roma, Silberberg, Ruggiero, and Suomi (2006). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(1), 74–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brosnan, S. F., Flemming, T., Talbot, C. F., Mayo, L., & Stoinski, T. (2011). Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) do not form expectations based on their partner's outcomes. Folia Primatologica, 82(1), 56–70. doi:10.1159/000328142.Google Scholar
  14. Brosnan, S. F., Freeman, C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Partner’s behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 68(7), 713–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brosnan, S. F., Schiff, H. C., & Waal, F. B. Md. (2005). Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proceedings B, 272, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C., Ahlgren, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2010). Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behaviour, 79(6), 1229–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burkart, J. M., Fehr, E., Efferson, C., & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: Common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(50), 19762–19766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., & Van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 18(5), 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114(3), 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clutton-Brock, T., & Parker, G. (1995). Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 373(6511), 209–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colman, A. D., Liebold, K. E., & Boren, J. J. (1969). A method for studying altruism in monkeys. Psychological Record, 19(3), 401–405.Google Scholar
  22. Cronin, K. A., Kurian, A. V., & Snowdon, C. T. (2005). Cooperative problem solving in a cooperatively breeding primate (Saguinus oedipus). Animal Behaviour, 69(1), 133–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cronin, K. A., Schroeder, K. K. E., & Snowdon, C. T. (2010). Prosocial behaviour emerges independent of reciprocity in cottontop tamarins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 277(1701), 3845–3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Waal, F. B. M. (1992). Appeasement, celebration, and food sharing in two pan species. In T. Nishida, W. C. McGrew, P. Marler, M. Pickford, & F. B. M. de Waal (Eds.), Human origins (pp. 37–50). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  25. de Waal, F. B. M. (2000). Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 60(2), 253–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Waal, F. B. M., Leimgruber, K., & Greenberg, A. R. (2008). Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(36), 13685–13689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Waal, F. B. M., & Suchak, M. (2010). Prosocial primates: Selfish and unselfish motivations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 365(1553), 2711–2722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dindo, M., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Partner effects on food consumption in brown capuchin monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 69(4), 448–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dubreuil, D., Gentile, M. S., & Visalberghi, E. (2006). Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse? Proceedings B, 273, 1223–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004a). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004b). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fehr, E., & Rockenbach, B. (2004). Human altruism: Economic, neural, and evolutionary perspectives. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(6), 784–790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fletcher, G. E. (2008). Attending to the outcome of others: Disadvantageous inequity aversion in male capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). American Journal of Primatology, 70(9), 901–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fontenot, M. B., Watson, S. L., Roberts, K. A., & Miller, R. W. (2007). Effects of food preferences on token exchange and behavioural responses to inequality in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behavior, 74, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gächter, S., Herrmann, B., & Thoni, C. (2004). Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: Survey and experimental evidence. [Original]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Galloway, A. T., Addessi, E., Fragaszy, D. M., & Visalberghi, E. (2005). Social facilitation of eating familiar food in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella): Does it involve behavioral coordination? International Journal of Primatology, 26(1), 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Geissmann, T., & Orgeldinger, M. (2000). The relationship between duet songs and pair bonds in siamangs, Hylobates syndactylus. Animal Behaviour, 60(6), 805–809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gilby, I. C., Eberly, L. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2008). Economic profitability of social predation among wild chimpanzees: Individual variation promotes cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 75(2), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hare, B. A., Melis, A. P., Woods, V., Hastings, S., & Wrangham, R. W. (2007). Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task. Current Biology, 17(7), 619–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hattori, Y., Kuroshima, H., & Fujita, K. (2005). Cooperative problem solving by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): Spontaneous division of labor, communication, and reciprocal altruism. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(3), 335–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Henrich, J. (2004). Inequity aversion in capuchins? Nature, 428, 139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327(5972), 1480–1484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. [Original]. Science, 312(5781), 1767–1770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hirata, S., & Fuwa, K. (2007). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) learn to act with other individuals in a cooperative task. Primates, 48(1), 13–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Horner, V., Carter, J. D., Suchak, M., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2011). Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(33), 13847–13851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Horowitz, A. (2012). Fair is fine, but more is better: Limits to inequity aversion in the domestic dog. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jaeggi, A., Stevens, J. & van Schaik, C. (2010). Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143, 41e51.Google Scholar
  54. Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007a). Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science, 318(5847), 107–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007b). Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(32), 13046–13050.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jensen, K., Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). What’s in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees. Proceedings of Royal Society London, Series B Biological Sciences, 273(1589), 1013–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lakshminarayanan, V. R., & Santos, L. R. (2008). Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Current Biology, 18(21), 999–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Langergraber, K. E., Mitani, J. C. C., & Vigilant, L. (2007). The limited impact of kinship on cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(19), 7786–7790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Massen, J., Luyten, I., Spruijt, B., & Sterck, E. (2011). Benefiting friends or dominants: Prosocial choices mainly depend on rank position in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Primates, 52(3), 237–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Massen, J. J. M., van den Berg, L. M., Spruijt, B. M., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2010). Generous leaders and selfish underdogs: Pro-sociality in despotic macaques. PLoS ONE, 5(3), e9734.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Cooperative problem-solving behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Folia Primatologica, 74(4), 211.Google Scholar
  62. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006a). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311, 1297–1300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006b). Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: Tolerance constraints on cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 72(2), 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Do chimpanzees reciprocate received favours? Animal Behaviour, 76(3), 951–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Chimpanzees coordinate in a negotiation game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(6), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Melis, A. P., & Semmann, D. (2010). How is human cooperation different? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 365(1553), 2663–2674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Melis, A. P., Warneken, F., Jensen, K., Schneider, A.-C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Chimpanzees help conspecifics obtain food and non-food items. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 278(1710), 1405–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mendres, K. A., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2000). Capuchins do cooperate: The advantage of an intuitive task. Animal Behaviour, 60(4), 523–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mitani, J. C. C. (2006). Demographic influences on the behavior of chimpanzees. Primates, 47(1), 6–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nishida, T., Hasegawa, T., Hayaki, H., Takahata, Y., & Uehara, S. (1992). Meat-sharing as a coalition strategy by an alpha male chimpanzee? In T. Nishida, W. C. McGrew, P. Marler, M. Pickford, & F. B. M. de Waal (Eds.), Topics in primatology (Vol. 1). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  71. Pelé, M., Dufour, V., Thierry, B., & Call, J. (2009). Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): Species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123(4), 375–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Perry, S. E., & Rose, L. (1994). Begging and transfer of coati meat by white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. Primates, 35(4), 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Price, S. A., & Brosnan, S. F. (2012). To each according to his need? Variability in the responses to inequity in non-human primates. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 140–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Raihani, N. J., & McAuliffe, K. (2012). Does inequity aversion motivate punishment? Cleaner fish as a model system. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Range, F., Leitner, K., & Viranyi, Z. (2012). The influence of the relationship and motivation on inequity aversion in dogs. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 170–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roma, P. G., Silberberg, A., Ruggiero, A. M., & Suomi, S. J. (2006). Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(1), 67–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rose, L. M. (1997). Vertebrate predation and food-sharing in Cebus and Pan. International Journal of Primatology, 18(5), 727–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Silk, J. B., Brosnan, S. F., Vonk, J., Henrich, J., Povinelli, D. J., Richardson, A. S., et al. (2005). Chimpanzees are indifferent t the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature, 437, 1357–1359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stevens, J. (2010). Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Animal Cognition, 13(4), 663–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stevens, J. R., & Gilby, I. C. (2004). A conceptual framework for Nonkin food sharing: Timing and currency of benefits. Animal Behaviour, 67(4), 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stevens, J. R., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. [Original]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 60–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Talbot, C. F., Freeman, H. D., Williams, L. E., & Brosnan, S. F. (2011). Squirrel monkeys' response to inequitable outcomes indicates a behavioural convergence within the primates. Biology Letters, 7(5), 680–682. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0211.Google Scholar
  83. Takimoto, A., Kuroshima, H., & Fujita, K. (2010). Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others’ reward: An experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics. Animal Cognition, 13(2), 249–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tennie, C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 482–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tinklepaugh, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 8(3), 197–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. [Original]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Wolkenten, M., Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(47), 18854–18859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Visalberghi, E., Quarantotti, B. P., & Tranchida, F. (2000). Solving a cooperation task without taking into account the partner’s behavior: The case of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114(3), 297–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Visalberghi, E., Sabbatini, G., Stammati, M., & Addessi, E. (2003). Preferences towards novel foods in Cebus apella: The role of nutrients and social influences. Physiology & Behavior, 80(2–3), 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vonk, J., Brosnan, S. F., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Richardson, A. S., Lambeth, S. P., et al. (2008). Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. Animal Behaviour, 75(5), 1757–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5(7), e184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Westergaard, G. C., Liv, C., Rocca, A. M., Cleveland, A., & Suomi, S. J. (2004). Tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) attribute value to foods and tools during voluntary exchanges with humans. Animal Cognition, 7(1), 19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wynne, C. D. L. (2004). Fair refusal by capuchin monkeys. Nature, 428, 140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yamagishi, T., & Mifune, N. (2009). Social exchange and solidarity: In-group love or out-group hate? Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(4), 229–237.Google Scholar
  96. Yamamoto, S., & Tanaka, M. (2010). The influence of kin relationship and reciprocal context on chimpanzees’ other-regarding preferences. Animal Behaviour, 79(3), 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations