Social Justice Research

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 168–190 | Cite as

Theory and Methods of a Representational Approach to Understanding Social Movements: The Role of the EDSA Revolution in a National Psychology of Protest for the Philippines

Article

Abstract

Three studies used the symbolic theory of history and identity to examine the impact of social representations of the 1986 EDSA I “People Power” revolution on participation in subsequent protest social movements in the Philippines. Study 1 found that in 4 state universities scattered across the archipelago of the Philippines, the first EDSA revolution was nominated as the most important event in Filipino history, and formed part of a narrative moving from authoritarian to democratic rule. Study 2 employed a mixed convenience sample of university students and adults to show that a measure of historical fatalism, or cynicism about the ability of EDSA I to produce lasting social change together with low identification with the social movement predicted lack of passive behavioral participation in the social movement that overthrew President Estrada in the EDSA II revolution. The importance of removing Estrada (derived from an expectancy–value/cost–-benefit analysis formulation) was the best predictor of active behavioral participation. Study 3 showed that historical fatalism was the best predictor of behavioral intentions to actively participate in an attempt to overthrow Estrada’s successor President Arroyo, whereas anger was the best predictor of passive behavioral intentions among university students. Results suggest an exhaustion of goodwill from Filipinos, who no longer believe that People Power can force positive change against endemic corruption in national governance.

Keywords

Social representations Social identity theory Social movements History Dual pathways model Symbolic theory of history and identity People power EDSA revolution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Cristina Montiel for helpful comments on a previous draft of this article, and Rebekah Goldstein-Hawes for statistical support for Study 1.

References

  1. Abueva, J. V. (2001). A crisis of political leadership: From “electoral democracy” to “substantive democracy”. In A. Doronila (Ed.), Between fires: Fifteen perspectives on the Estrada crisis (pp. 78–97). Pasig City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. David, R. S. (2002). Nation, self and citizenship: An invitation to Philippine sociology. Quezon City, Philippines: Department of Sociology, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
  3. Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Enriquez, V. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hilton, D. J., & Liu, J. H. (2008). Culture and inter-group relations. The role of social representations of history. In R. Sorrentino & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: The cultural context (pp. 343–368). New York: Guilford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang, L. L., Liu, J. H., & Chang, M. (2004). The “Double Identity” of Taiwanese Chinese: A dilemma of politics and culture rooted in history. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(2), 149–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Kirkwood, S., Liu, J. H., & Weatherall, A. (2005). Challenging the standard story of indigenous rights in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klandermans, B. (2002). How group identification helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their impact on identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, J. H., & László, J. (2007). A narrative theory of history and identity: Social identity, social representations, society and the individual. In G. Moloney & I. Walker (Eds.), Social representations and identity: Content, process and power (pp. 85–107). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Liu, J. H., Lawrence, B., Ward, C., & Abraham, S. (2002). Social representations of history in Malaysia and Singapore: On the relationship between national and ethnic identity. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, J. H., & Mills, D. (2006). Modern racism and market fundamentalism: The discourses of plausible deniability and their multiple functions. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, J. H., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Culture, social representations, and peacemaking: A symbolic theory of history and identity. In C. Montiel & N. Noor (Eds.), Peace psychology in Asia (pp. 21–42). Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, J. H., Wilson, M. W., McClure, J., & Higgins, T. R. (1999). Social identity and the perception of history: Cultural representations of Aotearoa/New Zealand. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1021–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mackie, D. (Ed.). (2003). From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Montiel, C. J. (2010). Social representations of democratic transition: Was the Philippine People Power One a non-violent power-shift or a military coup? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding (pp. 181–209). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moscovici, S., & Markova, I. (1998). Presenting social representations: A conversation. Culture & Psychology, 4, 371–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oegema, D., & Klandermans, B. (1994). Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: Erosion and non-conversion of support. American Sociological Review, 59, 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olick, J., & Robbins, J. (1998). Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reicher, S. (1984). The St. Paul’s riot: an explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Rimé, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–486). New York: Guildford Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz, B. (1996). Memory as a cultural system: Abraham Lincoln in World War II. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 908–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2004). Attitudes towards biculturalism in New Zealand: Social dominance orientation and Pakeha attitudes towards the general principles and resource-specific aspects of bicultural policy. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33, 88–99.Google Scholar
  32. Sibley, C. S., Liu, J. H., Duckitt, J., & Khan, S. S. (2008). Social representations of history and the legitimation of social inequality: The form and function of historical negation. European Journal of Psychology, 38, 542–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sibley, C. G., Liu, J. H., & Kirkwood, S. (2006). Toward a social representations theory of attitude change: The effect of message framing on general and specific attitudes toward equality and entitlement. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  34. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C. et al. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stürmer, S., Simon, B., Loewy, M., & Jörger, H. (2003). The dual-pathway model of social movement participation: The case of the fat acceptance movement. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P., Haslam, A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wagner, W., & Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory of social representations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or has been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied Cross Cultural Research, School of PsychologyVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of the Philippines-DilimanDilimanPhilippines

Personalised recommendations