Social Justice Research

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 369–383 | Cite as

Justifying Inequality: A Cross-Temporal Investigation of U.S. Income Disparities and Just-World Beliefs from 1973 to 2006

  • Lori W. Malahy
  • Michelle A. Rubinlicht
  • Cheryl R. Kaiser
Article

Abstract

This cross-temporal meta-analysis examined 6,120 American college students’ scores on the Belief in a Just World Scale (BJW; Rubin and Peplau, J Soc Issues 31(3):65–90, 1975) across the last three and a half decades. Drawing on models of belief threat, we examined whether the causal relationship between perceived injustice and increases in BJW could extend from the laboratory to society by using macro-economic injustice trends to predict changes in BJW across these decades. Specifically, we hypothesized that perceptions of inequality, operationalized as rising income disparities, would result in a greater need to justify this inequality and that this would be evidenced by increased commitment to just world beliefs over time. Consistent with this prediction, BJW scores increased significantly over time and this increase was positively related to increasing income disparities in society. Income inequality remained a significant predictor of BJW scores even after controlling for additional factors of general income and political ideology. Implications of increasing just world beliefs are discussed in terms of psychological and policy outcomes.

Keywords

Justice Meta-analysis Worldview Fairness Meaning Income disparities Inequality Belief in a just world 

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

  1. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 396–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. *Birkeli, K. G. (1994). Psychological determinants of the perception and tolerance of sexual harassment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation data, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  3. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. *Clayton, S. (1996). Reactions to social categorization: Evaluating one argument against affirmative action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1472–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Communication Survey by AFL-CIO, Peter D. Hart Research Associates, January, 1997. iPOLL Databank, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut. http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/ipoll.html. Retrieved 25 July 2009.
  6. *Corning, A. F. (2000). Assessing perceived social inequity: A relative deprivation framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 935–951.Google Scholar
  7. *Couch, J. V. (1998). Another psychometric evaluation of the just world scale. Psychological Reports, 82, 1283–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. *Cowan, G., & Curtis, S. R. (1994). Predictors of rape occurrence and victim blame in the Smith, William, Kennedy Case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. *Crandall, C., & Martínez, R. (1996). Culture, ideology and anti-fat attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1165–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. *Davidson, J. A. (1991). Belief in a just world and patterns of personal affiliation: An investigation of differences among successful university students of varying ethnicities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation data, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2005). General Social Surveys, 1972–2004 [data file] (National Opinion Research Center, Producer; Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Distributor). Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program University of California Website: http://sda.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 8 June 2009
  12. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D. & Smith, J. (2007). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2006. In U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-233. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. *DePalma, M. T., Madey, S. F., Tillman, T. C., & Wheeler, J. (1999). Perceived patient responsibility and belief in a just world affect helping. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. *Edlund, J. E., Sagarin, B. J., & Johnson, B. S. (2007). Reciprocity and belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. (1984). Just world beliefs and attitudes towards the poor. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 265–269.Google Scholar
  17. Furnham, A., & Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365–384.Google Scholar
  18. Hafer, C. L. (2000). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world?: Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. *Haupt, K. A., & Blumentritt, T. B. (2005). Effects of perceived sexual orientation on moral reasoning. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Journal of Undergraduate Research, 8.Google Scholar
  21. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of human motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. *Henderson-King, D., Henderson-King, E., Bolea, B., Koches, K., & Kauffman, A. (2004). Seeking understanding or sending bombs: Beliefs as predictors of responses to terrorism. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. “Inequality and the American Dream” (2006, June 17). The Economist. Google Scholar
  25. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). The benefits of illusions, the threat of disillusionment and the limits of inaccuracy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 158–176.Google Scholar
  26. Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.Google Scholar
  28. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaiser, C. R., Eccleston, C. P., & Hagiwara, N. (2008). Post-Hurricane Katrina racialized explanations as a system threat: Implications for Whites’ and Blacks’ racial attitudes. Social Justice Research, 21, 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaiser, C. R., Vick, S. B., & Major, B. (2004). A prospective investigation of the relationship between just world beliefs and the desire for revenge post-September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15, 503–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kay, A. C., Czaplinski, S., & Jost, J. T. (2009). System justifying effects of victim-enhancement and victim-derogation: The moderating role of political ideology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 290–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., et al. (in press). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Google Scholar
  33. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 305–358). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  35. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. *Kleinke, C., & Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victims by men and women with high and low beliefs in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. *Kravitz, D. A., Cutler, B. L., & Brock, P. (1993). Reliability and validity of the original and revised legal attitudes questionnaire. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 661–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. *Lench, H. C., & Chang, E. S. (2007). Belief in an unjust world: When beliefs in a just world fail. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(2), 126–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. *Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. *Lucas, T., Sheldon, A., Firestone, I., & LeBreton, J. M. (2007). Development and initial validation of a procedural and distributive just world measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGregor, I., Nail, P. R., Marigold, D. C., & Kang, S.-J. (2005). Defensive pride and consensus: Strength in imaginary numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 978–996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Conviction in the face of uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472–488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. *Murray, J. D., Spadafore, J. A., & McIntosh, W. D. (2005). Belief in a just world and social perception: Evidence for automatic activation. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 35–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pear, R. (2003, October 13). Welfare spending shows huge shift. The New York Times (pp. 1A).Google Scholar
  48. *Puhl, R. M., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2005). Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: A new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychology, 24, 517–525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rozin, P. (2007). Exploring the landscape of modern academic psychology: Finding and filling the holes. American Psychologist, 62, 754–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. *Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. *Rubinlicht, M., & Kaiser, C. (2006). Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  52. Schmuckler, M. A. (2001). What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy, 2, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. *Schuller, R. A., Smith, V. L., & Olson, J. M. (1994). Jurors decisions in trials of battered women who kill—The role of prior beliefs and expert testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 316–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. *Shorkey, C. T. (1980). Relationship between rational thinking and belief in a just world. Psychological Reports, 46, 161–162.Google Scholar
  56. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman & P. E. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. *Sloan, P. J. (2000). Relationship between single-sex schooling on traditional gender role perceptions and just world beliefs amongst college students in Orthodox Jewish communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, K., & Green, D. (1984). Individual correlates of the belief in a just world. Psychological Reports, 34, 435–438.Google Scholar
  59. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2004). The cultural animal: Twenty years of terror management theory and research. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 13–34). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  60. *Taylor, C., & Kleinke, C. L. (1992). Effects of severity of accident, history of drunk driving, intent, and remorse on judgements of a drunk driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1641–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tukey, J. W. (1962). The future of data analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Twenge, J. M. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1007–1021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Age and birth cohort differences in self-esteem: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. U.S. Census Bureau (n.d.). Current population survey, The population 14 to 24 years old by high school graduate status, college enrollment, attainment, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: October 1967 to 2007, Table A-5a. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school.html. Retrieved 9 June 2009.
  65. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Digest of Education Statistics: 2007. Report No. NCES 2008-022. National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/index.asp. Retrieved 27 July 2008.
  66. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity theory & research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar
  67. *Weir, J. A., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1990). The determinants of mock jurors’ verdicts in a rape case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. *Whatley, M., & Riggio, R. E. (1993). Gender differences in attributions of blame for male rape victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yoshimura, K., & Hardin, C. D. (2009). Cognitive salience of subjugation and the ideological justification of U.S. geopolitical dominance in Japan. Social Justice Research, 22, 298–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. *Zucker, G. S., & Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty—An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 925–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. *Zweigenhaft, R. L., Phillips, B. K. G., Adams, K. A., Morse, C. K., & Horan, A. E. (1985). Religious preference and belief in a just world. Genetic Psychology and General Psychology Monographs, 111, 338–348.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lori W. Malahy
    • 1
  • Michelle A. Rubinlicht
    • 2
  • Cheryl R. Kaiser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations