Social Justice Research

, Volume 22, Issue 2–3, pp 312–333 | Cite as

System Justification and the Meaning of Life: Are the Existential Benefits of Ideology Distributed Unequally Across Racial Groups?

  • Lindsay E. Rankin
  • John T. Jost
  • Cheryl J. Wakslak


In this research, we investigated the relations among system justification, religiosity, and subjective well-being in a sample of nationally representative low-income respondents in the United States. We hypothesized that ideological endorsement of the status quo would be associated with certain existential and other psychological benefits, but these would not necessarily be evenly distributed across racial groups. Results revealed that religiosity was positively associated with subjective well-being in general, but the relationship between system justification and well-being varied considerably as a function of racial group membership. For low-income European Americans, stronger endorsement of system justification as an ideology was associated with increased positive affect, decreased negative affect, and a wide range of existential benefits, including life satisfaction and a subjective sense of security, meaning, and mastery. These findings are consistent with the notion that system justification satisfies psychological needs for personal control and serves a palliative function for its adherents. However, many of these effects were considerably weakened or even reversed for African American respondents. Thus, the psychological benefits associated with religiosity existed for both racial groups, whereas the benefits of system justification were distributed unequally across racial groups.


Ideology System justification Religiosity Well-being Existential motivation 


  1. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanton, H., George, G., & Crocker, J. (2001). Contexts of system justification and system evaluation: Exploring the social comparison strategies of the (not yet) contented female worker. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks, D. (2003, January 12). The triumph of hope over self-interest. The New York Times, p. 15.Google Scholar
  5. Bulman, R. J., & Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 351–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Central Intelligence Agency. (2009). United States. In World factbook. Retrieved 4 March 2009.
  8. Choma, B. L., Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2009). Liberal and conservative ideologies: Different routes to happiness? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 502–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crumbaugh, J. (1968). Cross-validation of a purpose-in-life test based on Frankl’s concepts. Journal of Individual Psychology, 24, 74–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalbert, C. (1998). Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimization and belief in a just world (pp. 87–105). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dalbert, C. (2002). Beliefs in a just world as a buffer against anger. Social Justice Research, 15, 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elster, J. (1982). Belief, bias, and ideology. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism (pp. 123–148). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Frank, T. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas? New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gallup. (2008, December 24). The complex relationship between religion and purpose. Retrieved 10 January 2009.
  16. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. (1989). Beliefs in a just world and reactions to personal deprivation. Journal of Personality, 57, 799–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanesberry, L. (1959). A raisin in the sun. London: Samuel French.Google Scholar
  20. Hathaway, W. L., & Pargament, K. I. (1991). The religious dimensions of coping: Implications for prevention and promotion. Prevention in Human Services, 9, 65–92.Google Scholar
  21. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henry, P. J., & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hochschild, J. (1981). What’s fair? American beliefs about distributive justice. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hughes, L. (1951). Harlem. In Montage of a dream deferred. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  25. Isherwood, C. (2009, May 5). Willy Loman is lost, still looking for stimulus plan and some dignity. The New York Times.
  26. Jackman, M. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.Google Scholar
  28. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jost, J. T., Wakslak, C., & Tyler, T. R. (2008). System justification theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. In K. Hegtvedt & J. Clay-Warner (Eds.), Justice: Advances in group processes (Vol. 25, pp. 181–211). Bingley: JAI/Emerald.Google Scholar
  39. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kay, A., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Krause, N. (2003). Religious meaning and subjective well-being in late life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58, S160–S170.Google Scholar
  44. Krause, N. (2004). Common facets of religion, unique facets of religion, and life satisfaction among older African Americans. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59, S109–S117.Google Scholar
  45. Lane, R. E. (1959). The fear of equality. American Political Science Review, 53, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Moscovitch, D. A. (2008). On the belief in God: Towards an understanding of the emotional substrates of compensatory control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1559–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lipkus, I. M., & Bissonnette, V. L. (1996). Relationships among belief in a just world, willingness to accommodate, and marital well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1043–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). In C. J. Arthur (Ed.), The German ideology. New York: International Publishers. (Original work published 1846).Google Scholar
  52. McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mehrabian, A. (1996). Relations among political attitudes, personality, and psychopathology assessed with new measures of libertarianism and conservatism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Melender, H. L., & Lauri, S. (2002). Experiences of security associated with pregnancy and childbirth: A study of pregnant women. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 8, 289–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller, A. (1999). Death of a salesman. New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1949).Google Scholar
  56. Moore, M. (2003). Dude, where’s my country? New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  57. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pargament, K. I. (2002). Is religion nothing but…? Explaining religion versus explaining religion away. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pearlin, L., Lieberman, M., Menaghan, E., & Mullan, J. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Quinn, D. M., & Crocker, J. (1999). When ideology hurts: Effects of belief in the Protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 402–414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1972). The hidden injuries of class. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  63. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732–740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  66. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 595–629). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  67. United States Census Bureau. (2008). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007 by C. DeNavas-Walt, B. D. Proctor, & J. C. Smith. Retrieved 16 November 2008.
  68. Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. West, C. (1993). Keeping faith: Philosophy and race in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsay E. Rankin
    • 1
  • John T. Jost
    • 1
  • Cheryl J. Wakslak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Marshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations