Skip to main content

Revenge, Retribution, and Values: Social Attitudes and Punitive Sentencing

Social Justice Research volume 21, pages 138–163 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examined the pattern of relations between vengeance attitudes, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO) using the structure of value types proposed by Schwartz (Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65, 1992). Relations between these variables and support for a variety of sentencing options, including capital punishment, were then investigated. One hundred and forty-eight students in Adelaide, South Australia, completed a Vengeance Scale (Stuckless and Goranson, J Soc Behav Pers 7:25–42, 1992), measures of RWA and SDO, the Schwartz Value Survey (1992), and a Sentencing Goals Scale. As predicted, vengeance attitudes and SDO were found to be positively related to the importance of power values and negatively related to the importance of universalism and benevolence values. Vengeance attitudes were negatively related to rehabilitation and positively related to support for retribution and incapacitation sentencing goals, while RWA was positively related to the endorsement of deterrence and incapacitation as sentencing goals. Regression analyses indicated that only RWA and vengeance attitudes were unique predictors of death penalty support. Results provide support for the suggestion that vengeance is closely associated with our notion of retributive justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The “other authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. E. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, S. W., & Hartnagel, T. F. (1996). “Lock ‘em up”: Attitudes toward punishing juvenile offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizumic, B., Duckitt, J., & Bosnjak, S. (2007, April). The three faces of right-wing authoritarianism: Authoritarianism, conservatism, and traditionalism. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Conference of the Society of Australasian Social Psychologists, Brisbane, Queensland.

  • Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish?: Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. (1993). Some experimental approaches to authoritarianism: II. Authoritarianism and punitiveness. In W. F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining Southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohrs, J., Moschner, B., Maes, J., & Kielmann, S. (2005). The motivational bases of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson (1991). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M. (2002). Just punishments: Research on retributional justice. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 659–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward high achievers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 152–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2005). Values, religion, and motivation. In M. L. Maehr & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 14, pp. 35–73). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., Boeckmann, R. J., & McKee, I. R. (2001). Jail sentence, community service, or compensation?: Predicting reactions to a serious corporate offence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Restoration and retribution: How including retributive components affects the acceptability of restorative justice procedures. Social Justice Research, 19, 395–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest co-ordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaven, P. C. L., & Connors, J. R. (2001). A note on the value correlates of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 925–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, A., Brahler, E., Schmidt, P., & Albani, C. (2005). Investigating the circumplex structure of the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ). Journal of Individual Difference, 26(4), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, R., ForsterLee, L., ForsterLee, R., & Crofts, N. (2002). Justice versus vengeance: Motives underlying punitive judgements. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFatter, R. M. (1978). Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1490–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFatter, R. M. (1982). Purposes of punishment: Effects of utilities of criminal sanctions on perceived appropriateness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 255–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Vidmar, N. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 145–172). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Violence and U.S. regional culture. American Psychologist, 48, 441–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the south. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenquist, A. (1988). An explanation of retribution. Journal of Philosophy, 85, 464–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollenburger, J. C. (1986). Panel members’ attitudes towards justice: An assessment. British Journal of Criminology, 26, 372–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (1998). Crime, criminal justice, and public opinion. In M. H. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohan, M., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Value transmission in families. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, P., & Willson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64(3), 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values – Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (Eds.). (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1989). The emotions of justice. Social Justice Research, 3, 345–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1994). Sympathy and vengeance: The role of the emotions in justice. In S. H. M. van Goozen, N. E. Van de Poll, & J. A. Sergeant (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckless, N., & Goranson, R. ( 1992). The vengeance scale: Development of a measure of attitudes toward revenge. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, N. (2002). Retributive justice: Its social context. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton. (2005). The death penalty in Australia and overseas. http://www.nswccl.org.au/docs/pdf/bp3%202005%20dp%20paper.pdf. Retrieved 9 Nov 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia

    Ian R. McKee & N. T. Feather

Authors
  1. Ian R. McKee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. T. Feather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian R. McKee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKee, I.R., Feather, N.T. Revenge, Retribution, and Values: Social Attitudes and Punitive Sentencing. Soc Just Res 21, 138–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0066-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0066-z

Keywords

  • Revenge
  • Values
  • Authoritarianism
  • Social dominance
  • Sentencing goals