Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Social Service Workers

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concepts of fairness and justice are embodied within the organizing principle of social justice. Although social justice is a primary focus of social work, social service workers are not always treated with fairness by their own employers. The results from a survey of 255 social service employees from a variety of agencies in Northwest Ohio indicate that distributive justice and procedural justice, two dimensions of organizational justice, are both significant predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment, with procedural justice having two to three times the impact of distributive justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Soc. Justice Res. 1: 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverly, D., and McSweeney, E. (1987). Social Welfare and Social Justice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H., Cohen, R., and Greenberg, J. (1986). Justice in Social Relations, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayfield, A., and Rothe, H. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psychol. 35: 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocato, J., and Wagner, E. (2003). Harm reduction: A social work practice model and social justice agenda. Health Soc. Work 28(2): 117–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., and Dunkerley, D. (1980). Organization, Class, and Control, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Hum. Relat. 38: 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, M. (2002). Special issue editorial. Br. J. Soc. Work 32: 659–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotten, T., and Tuttle, J. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 11: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Social Work Education (2003). Handbook of Accreditation Standards and Procedures, CSWE, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranny, C., Smith, P., and Stone, E. (eds.) (1992). Job Satisfaction: How People Feel About Their Jobs and How It Affects Their Performance, Lexington Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (1997) (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Social Work, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. (1995). Social justice and social agencies. In Edwards, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work, 19th edn., NASW, Washington, DC, pp. 2173–2179.

  • Folger, R., and Bies, R. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities Rights J. 2(2): 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellis, Z. D. (2001). Job stress among academic health center and community hospital social workers. Adm. Soc. Work 25(3): 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D. (1998). Confronting Injustice and Oppression: Concepts and Strategies for Social Workers, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., and Durick, M. (1988). Predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in human service organizations. Adm. Q. 33: 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 340–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad. Manage. Rev. 12: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990a). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J. Manage. 16: 399–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990b). Looking fair vs. being fair. Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Shaw, B., and Cummings, L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 111–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990c). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psychol. 75: 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Process. 89: 985–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C., Roznowski, M., and Hachiya, D. (1985). Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions: Empirical and theoretical discrepancies and an integration. Psychol. Bull. 97: 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzhaky, H., and Aviad-Hiebloom, A. (1998). How supervision and role stress in social work affect burnout. Arete 22(2): 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne, S., and Chess, W. (1984). Job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover: A national study. Soc. Work 29: 448–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joy, V., and Witt, L. (1992). Delay of gratification as a moderator of procedural justice–distributive justice relationship. Group Organ. Manage. 17: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J., and Kalleberg, A. (1990). Culture, Control, and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longres, J., and Scanlon, E. (2001). Social justice and the research curriculum. J. Soc. Work Educ. 37: 447–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., and Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group Organ. Manage. 21: 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., and Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychol. Bull. 108: 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R., Porter, L., and Steers, R. (1982). Employee–Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover, Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C., Iverson, R., and Jo, D. (1999). Distributive justice: Evaluations in two cultural contexts: A comparison of U.S. and South Korean teachers. Hum. Relat. 52: 869–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers (1996). Code of Ethics, NASW, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, C. III, and Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelton, L. (2001). Social justice and social work. J. Soc. Work Educ. 37: 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, J. (1994). Job task and organizational predictors of social worker job satisfaction change: A panel study. Adm. Soc. Work 18(1): 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, J. E. (1995). Job satisfaction of social work supervisors and administrators. Adm. Soc. Work 19(4): 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., and Mueller, C. (1986). Absenteeism and Turnover Among Hospital Employees, JAI, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiro-Tajalli, I., McNutt, J., and Campbell, C. (2003). International social and economic justice and online advocacy. Int. Soc. Work 46(2): 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B., Lewicki, R., and Minton, J. (1992). Organizational Justice: The Search for Fairness in the Workplace, Lexington Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, M. (2002). Mental health and social justice: Gender, race, and psychological consequences of unfairness. Br. J. Soc. Work 32: 779–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Erlbaum/Halstead, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (1990). Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to access the fairness of legal procedures. Law Soc. Rev. 22: 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, L., and Wilson, J. (1991). Moderating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between equity and extra-role behaviors. J. Soc. Psychol. 13: 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric G. Lambert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, E.G., Cluse-Tolar, T., Pasupuleti, S. et al. The Impact of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Social Service Workers. Soc Just Res 18, 411–427 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-8568-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-8568-4

Key Words

Navigation