Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Evaluation of Automated Solar Filament Detection

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a comparative evaluation for automated filament detection in Hα solar images. By using metadata produced by the Advanced Automated Filament Detection and Characterization Code (AAFDCC) module, we adapted our trainable feature recognition (TFR) module to accurately detect regions in solar images containing filaments. We first analyze the AAFDCC module’s metadata and then transform it into labeled datasets for machine-learning classification. Visualizations of data transformations and classification results are presented and accompanied by statistical findings. Our results confirm the reliable event reporting of the AAFDCC module and establishes our TFR module’s ability to effectively detect solar filaments in Hα solar images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banda, J.M.: 2011, Framework for creating large-scale content-based image retrieval system (CBIR) for solar data analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Montana State University.

  • Banda, J.M., Angryk, R.A.: 2010a, An experimental evaluation of popular image parameters for monochromatic solar image categorization. In: Guesgen, H.W., Murray, R.C. (eds.) The Proceedings of the 23rd Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 380 – 385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banda, J.M., Angryk, R.A.: 2010b, Selection of image parameters as the first step towards creating a CBIR system for the solar dynamics observatory. In: Zhang, J., Shen, C., Geers, G., Wu, Q. (eds.) International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), IEEE Conference Publishing Services, Piscataway, 528 – 534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banda, J.M., Schuh, M.A., Wylie, T., McInerney, P., Angryk, R.A.: 2014, When too similar is bad: A practical example of the solar dynamics observatory content-based image-retrieval system. In: Catania, B., Cerquitelli, T., Chiusano, S., Guerrini, G., Kämpf, M., Kemper, A., Novikov, B., Palpanas, T., Pokorný, J., Vakali, A. (eds.) New Trends in Databases and Information Systems Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 241, Springer, Cham, 87 – 95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, P.N., Rust, D.M., Hakim, D.: 2005, Advanced automated solar filament detection and characterization code: Description, performance, and results. Solar Phys. 228, 97 – 117.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L.: 2001, Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5 – 32.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, V., Fleck, B., Poland, A.I.: 1995, The SoHO mission: An overview. Solar Phys. 162, 1 – 37.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Domingos, P., Pazzani, M.: 1997, On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach. Learn. 29, 103 – 130.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, N., Aboudarham, J., Bentley, R.D.: 2005, Filament recognition and image cleaning on Meudon Hα spectroheliograms. Solar Phys. 227, 61 – 73.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., Wang, H., Zhou, M.: 2002, Development of an automatic filament disappearance detection system. Solar Phys. 205, 93 – 103.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: 2009, The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explor. 11, 10 – 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, B.N., Acton, L.W., Kankelborg, C.C., Wolfson, C.J., Akin, D.J., Bruner, M.E., Caravalho, R., Catura, R.C., Chevalier, R., Duncan, D.W., Edwards, C.G., Feinstein, C.N., Freeland, S.L., Friedlaender, F.M., Hoffmann, C.H., Hurlburt, N.E., Jurcevich, B.K., Katz, N.L., Kelly, G.A., Lemen, J.R., Levay, M., Lindgren, R.W., Mathur, D.P., Meyer, S.B., Morrison, S.J., Morrison, M.D., Nightingale, R.W., Pope, T.P., Rehse, R.A., Schrijver, C.J., Shine, R.A., Shing, L., Strong, K.T., Tarbell, T.D., Title, A.M., Torgerson, D.D., Golub, L., Bookbinder, J.A., Caldwell, D., Cheimets, P.N., Davis, W.N., Deluca, E.E., McMullen, R.A., Warren, H.P., Amato, D., Fisher, R., Maldonado, H., Parkinson, C.: 1999, The Transition Region And Coronal Explorer (TRACE). Solar Phys. 187, 229 – 260.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Japkowicz, N.: 2000, Learning from imbalanced data sets: A comparison of various strategies. In: Japkowicz, N. (ed.) AAAI Technical Report WS-00-05, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 10 – 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, P.C.H., Zwaan, C.: 2001, Origin and evolution of filament-prominence systems. Astrophys. J. 558, 872 – 887.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, P.C.H., Attrill, G.D.R., Davey, A.R., Engell, A., Farid, S., Grigis, P.C., Kasper, J., Korreck, K., Saar, S.H., Savcheva, A., Su, Y., Testa, P., Wills-Davey, M., Bernasconi, P.N., Raouafi, N.E., Delouille, V.A., Hochedez, J.F., Cirtain, J.W., DeForest, C.E., Angryk, R.A., Moortel, I., Wiegelmann, T., Georgoulis, M.K., McAteer, R.T.J., Timmons, R.P.: 2012, Computer vision for the solar dynamics observatory. Solar Phys. 275, 79 – 113.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.F., Alexander, W.: 2009, An investigation of exceptions to the solar hemispheric patterns, in small telescopes and astronomical research. In: Genet, R.M., Johnson, J.M., Wallen, V. (eds.) Proceedings of Galileo’s Legacy, a Celebration of Small Telescopes and Astronomical Research Four Centuries Later, Collins Foundation, San Francisco, 1 – 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, W.D.: 1999, CFITSIO, v2.0: A new full-featured data interface. In: Mehringer, D.M., Plante, R.L., Roberts, D.A. (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems, ASP Conf. Ser. 172, 287 – 489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesnell, W.D., Thompson, B.T., Chamberlin, P.C.: 2011, The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Solar Phys. 275, 3 – 15.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pevtsov, A.A., Balasubramaniam, K.S., Rogers, J.W.: 2003, Chirality of chromospheric filaments. Astrophys. J. 595, 500 – 505.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, M., Shih, F.Y., Jing, J., Wang, H.: 2005, Automatic solar filament detection using image processing techniques. Solar Phys. 228, 119 – 135.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R.: 1986, Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 86 – 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, M.A., Banda, J.M., Angryk, R.A., Martens, P.C.H.: 2013a, Introducing the first publicly available Content-Based Image-Retrieval system for the Solar Dynamics Observatory mission. 44th AAS-SPD Meeting, #100.97.

  • Schuh, M.A., Angryk, R.A., Ganesan Pillai, K., Banda, J., Martens, P.C.H.: 2013b, A large scale solar image dataset with labeled event regions. In: Proc. International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 4349 – 4353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekhar, S., Chawla, S.: 2003, Spatial Databases: A Tour, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 45 – 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, F.Y., Kowalski, A.J.: 2003, Automatic extraction of filaments in Hα solar images. Solar Phys. 218, 99 – 122.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, H., Mori, S., Yamawaki, T.: 1978, Texture features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 8, 460 – 472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V.N.: 1995, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, London, 267 – 290.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research and development project was supported by two NASA Grant Awards: No. NNX09AB03G, funded from the NNH08ZDA001N-SDOSC solicitation, and No. NNX11AM13A, funded from the NNH11ZHA003C solicitation. We would also like to thank our internal reviewers as well as the Big Bear Solar Observatory/New Jersey Institute of Technology and the Global High Resolution Hα Network for providing and maintaining the ftp image data archive.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Schuh.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Complete attribute evaluation results. Note we do not try every possible combination of attributes, as discussed in the text. The first column denotes the set of attributes used for the evaluation.
Table 5 Comparative evaluation results for all dataset variations. The three grid sizes are separated by a horizontal line, and presented in order of: 16 × 16, 32 × 32, and 64 × 64. Time is given in seconds, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision (PRE) are averaged over both classes.

The appendix contains the complete tabulated results for the discussed experiments. The summarized charts and insights were gathered from this data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuh, M.A., Banda, J.M., Bernasconi, P.N. et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Automated Solar Filament Detection. Sol Phys 289, 2503–2524 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0495-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0495-9

Keywords

Navigation