Abstract
We compare photospheric line-of-sight magnetograms from the Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun (SOLIS) Vector Spectro-Magnetograph (VSM) instrument with observations from the 150-foot Solar Tower at Mt. Wilson Observatory (MWO), the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), and the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO). We find very good agreement between VSM and the other data sources for both disk-averaged flux densities and pixel-by-pixel measurements. We show that the VSM mean flux density time series is of consistently high signal-to-noise ratio with no significant zero offsets. We discuss in detail some of the factors – spatial resolution, flux dependence, and position on the solar disk – affecting the determination of scaling between VSM and SOHO/MDI or SDO/HMI magnetograms. The VSM flux densities agree well with spatially smoothed data from MDI and HMI, although the scaling factors show a clear dependence on flux density. The factor to convert VSM to HMI increases with increasing flux density (from ≈1 to ≈1.5). The nonlinearity is smaller for the VSM vs. SOHO/MDI scaling factor (from ≈1 to ≈1.2).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balasubramaniam, K.S., Pevtsov, A.: 2011, Ground-based synoptic instrumentation for solar observations. In: Fineschi, S., Fennelly, J. (eds.) Solar Physics and Space Weather Instrumentation IV., Proc. SPIE 8148, 814809.
Berger, T.E., Lites, B.W.: 2002, Weak-field magnetogram calibration using Advanced Stokes Polarimeter flux-density maps – I. Solar Optical Universal Polarimeter calibration. Solar Phys. 208, 181.
Berger, T.E., Lites, B.W.: 2003, Weak-field magnetogram calibration using Advanced Stokes Polarimeter flux density maps – II. SOHO/MDI full-disk mode calibration. Solar Phys. 213, 213.
Cauzzi, G., Smaldone, L.A., Balasubramaniam, K.S., Keil, S.L.: 1993, On the calibration of line-of-sight magnetograms. Solar Phys. 146, 207.
Demidov, M.L., Golubeva, E.M., Balthasar, H., Staude, J., Grigoryev, V.M.: 2008, Comparison of solar magnetic fields measured at different observatories: peculiar strength ratio distributions across the disk. Solar Phys. 250, 279.
Freeland, S.L., Handy, B.N.: 1998, Data analysis with the SolarSoft System. Solar Phys. 182, 497.
Harvey, J.W., Branston, D., Henney, C.J., Keller, C.U., SOLIS and GONG Teams: 2007, Seething horizontal magnetic fields in the quiet solar photosphere. Astrophys. J. Lett. 659, L177.
Isobe, T., Feigelson, E.D., Akritas, M.G., Babu, G.J.: 1990, Linear regression in astronomy. Astrophys. J. 364, 104.
Jones, H.P.: 1996, Online analysis and compression of spectra-spectroheliograms. In: Rust, D.M. (ed.). Missions to the Sun, Proc. SPIE 2804, 110.
Jones, H.P., Ceja, J.A.: 2001, Preliminary comparison of magnetograms from KPVT/SPM, SOHO/MDI and GONG+. In: Sigwarth, M. (ed.) Advanced Solar Polarimetry – Theory, Observation, and Instrumentation, ASP Conf. Ser. 236, 87.
Jones, H.P., Duvall, T.L. Jr., Harvey, J.W., Mahaffey, C.T., Schwitters, J.D., Simmons, J.E.: 1992, The NASA/NSO spectromagnetograph. Solar Phys. 139, 211.
Jones, H.P., Harvey, J.W., Henney, C.J., Keller, C.U., Malanushenko, O.M.: 2004, Measurement scale of the SOLIS vector spectromagnetograph. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 36, 709.
Keller, C.U., Harvey, J.W., Giampapa, M.S.: 2003, SOLIS: An innovative suite of synoptic instruments. In: Keil, S.L., Avakyan, S.V. (eds.) Innovative Telescopes and Instrumentation for Solar Astrophysics, Proc. SPIE 4853, 194.
Leka, K.D., Barnes, G.: 2012, Modeling and interpreting the effects of spatial resolution on solar magnetic field maps. Solar Phys. 277, 89.
Liu, Y., Hoeksema, J.T., Scherrer, P.H., Schou, J., Couvidat, S., Bush, R.I., Duvall, T.L., Hayashi, K., Sun, X., Zhao, X.: 2012, Comparison of line-of-sight magnetograms taken by the Solar Dynamics Observatory/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager and Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Michelson Doppler Imager. Solar Phys. 279, 295.
Livingston, W.C., Harvey, J., Pierce, A.K., Schrage, D. Gillespie, B., Simmons, J., Slaughter, C.: 1976a, Kitt Peak 60-cm vacuum telescope. Appl. Opt. 15, 33.
Livingston, W.C., Harvey, J., Slaughter, C., Trumbo, D.: 1976b, Solar magnetograph employing integrated diode arrays. Appl. Opt. 15, 40.
Rees, D.E., Semel, M.D.: 1979, Line formation in an unresolved magnetic element – A test of the centre of gravity method. Astron. Astrophys. 74, 1.
Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., Hoeksema, J.T., Kosovichev, A.G., Schou, J., et al.: 1995, The Solar Oscillation Investigation – Michelson Doppler Imager. Solar Phys. 162, 129.
Scherrer, P.H., Schou, J., Bush, R.I., Kosovichev, A.G., Bogart, R.S., Hoeksema, J.T., et al.: 2012, The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) investigation for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Solar Phys. 275, 207.
Thornton, C.E., Jones, H.P.: 2002, Comparison of three solar magnetographs. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 34, 1243.
Tran, T., Bertello, L., Ulrich, R.K., Evans, S.: 2005, Magnetic fields from SOHO MDI converted to the Mount Wilson 150 foot Solar Tower scale. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 156, 295.
Ulrich, R.K., Evans, S., Boyden, J.E., Webster, L.: 2002, Mount Wilson synoptic magnetic fields: Improved instrumentation, calibration, and analysis applied to the 2000 July 14 flare and to the evolution of the dipole field. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 139, 259.
Wenzler, T., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Fluri, D.M.: 2004, Comparison between KPVT/SPM and SoHO/MDI magnetograms with an application to solar irradiance reconstructions. Astron. Astrophys. 427, 1031.
Acknowledgement
We thank R.K. Ulrich for providing the MWO mean flux time series. The SOLIS data used here are produced cooperatively by NSF/NSO and NASA/LWS. HMI/SDO is a project of NASA. MDI/SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pietarila, A., Bertello, L., Harvey, J.W. et al. Comparison of Ground-Based and Space-Based Longitudinal Magnetograms. Sol Phys 282, 91–106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0138-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0138-y