Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction Test for the Two Extremely Strong Solar Storms in October 2003

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In late October and early November 2003, a series of space weather hazard events erupted in solar-terrestrial space. Aiming at two intense storm (shock) events on 28 and 29 October, this paper presents a Two-Step method, which combines synoptic analysis of space weather–`observing’ and quantitative prediction – ‘palpating’, and uses it to test predictions. In the first step, ‘observing’, on the basis of observations of the source surface magnetic field, interplanetary scintillation (IPS) and ACE spacecraft, we find that the propagation of the shock waves is asymmetric and northward relative to the normal direction of their solar sources due to the large-scale configuration of the coronal magnetic fields, and the Earth is located near the direction of the fastest speed and greatest energy of the shocks. Being two fast ejection shock events, the fast explosion of extremely high temperature and strong magnetic field, and background solar wind velocity as high as 600 and 1000 km s−1, are also helpful to their rapid propagation. According to the synoptic analysis, the shock travel times can be estimated as 21 and 20 h, which are close to the observational results of 19.97 and 19.63 h, respectively. In the second step, ‘palpating’, we adopt a new membership function of the fast shock events for the ISF method. The predicted results here show that for the onset time of the geomagnetic disturbance, the relative errors between the observational and the predicted results are 1.8 and 6.7%, which are consistent with the estimated results of the first step; and for the magnetic disturbance magnitude, the relative errors between the observational and the predicted results are 4.1 and 3.1%, respectively. Furthermore, the comparison among the predicted results of our Two-Step method with those of five other prevailing methods shows that the Two-Step method is advantageous in predicting such strong shock event. It can predict not only shock arrival time, but also the magnitude of magnetic disturbance. The results of the present paper tell us that understanding the physical features of shock propagation thoroughly is of great importance in improving the prediction efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbieri, L.P. and Mahmot, R.E.: 2004, Space Weather 2, S09002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cary, O.: 2004, Space Weather 2, S08001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K.-S., Moon, Y.-J., Dryer, M., Fry, C.D., Park, Y.-D., and Kim, K.-S.: 2003, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryer, M. and Smart, D.F.: 1984, Adv. Space Res. 4, 291.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dryer, M., Smith, Z., Fry, C.D., Sun, W., Deehr, C.S., and Akasofu, S.-I.: 2004, Space Weather 2, S09001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, C.D., Sun, W., Deehr, C.S., Dryer, M., Smith, Z., Akasofu, S.-I., Tokumaru, M., and Kojima, M.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106(20), 985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, C.D., Dryer, M., Deehr, C.S., Sun, W., Akasofu, S.-I., and Smith, Z.: 2003, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalswamy, N., Barbieri, L., Lu, G., Plunkett, S.P., and Skoug, R.M.: 2005, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L03S01.

  • Hakamada, K. and Akasofu S.-I.: 1982, Space Sci. Rev. 31, 3.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, M. and Kakinuma, T.J.: 1987, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 7269.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwabara, T., Munakata, K., Yasue, S., Kato, C., Akahane, S., Koyama, M., Bieber, J.W., Evenson, P., Pyle, R., Fujii, Z., Tokumaru, M., Kojima, M., Marubashi, K., Duldig, M.L., Humble, J.E., Silva, M. R., Trivedi, N.B., Gonzalez, W.D., and Schuch, N.J.: 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L19803.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lario, D., Decker, R.B., Livi, S., Krimigis, S.M., Roelof, E.C., Russell, C. T., and Fry, C.D.: 2005, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A09S11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R.E., Baker, D.N. and Allen, J.E.: 2004, Eos Trans. AGU. 85, 105.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Malandraki, O.E., Lario, D., Lanzerotti, L.J., Sarris, E.T., Geranios, A., and Tsiropoula, G.: 2005, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A09S06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoharan, P.K., Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Lara, A., Michalek, G., and Howard, R.A.: 2004, J. Geophys. Res. 109, A06109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Y.-J., Dryer, M., Smith, Z., Park, Y.D., and Cho K.-S.: 2002, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1390.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, S.: 1982, Space Sci. Rev. 32, 145.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rickett, B.T. and Kakinuma, T.J.: 1991, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 1717.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Skoug, R.M., Gosling, J.T., Steinberg, J.T., McComas, D.J., Smith, C.W., Ness, N.F., Hu, Q., and Burlaga, L.F.: 2004, J. Geophys. Res. 109, A09102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Z., Dryer, M., Ort, E., and Murtagh, W.: 2000, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 62, 1265.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T. and Schwenn, R.: 1989, Space Sci. Rev. 51, 147.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. and Allen, J.: 2004, Space Weather. 2, S03008.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F.S.: 1982, Chinese Journal of Space Science. 6, 76.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F.S.: 1984, Acta Geophysica Sinica 27, 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F.S. and Cai, H.C.: 1990, Chinese Journal of Space Science 10, 35.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F.S. and Dryer, M.: 1991, Solar Phys. 132, 373.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F.S., Cai, H.C., Feng, X.S., and Shi, J.K.: 2003, Adv. Space Res. 31, 1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F.S., Feng, X.S., Xu, Y., and Fan, Q.L.: 2005, Adv. Space Res. 36, 2363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T.N., Eparvier, F.G., Fontenla, J., Harder, J., Kopp, G., McClintock, W.E., Rottman, G., Smiley, B., and Snow, M.: 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L10802.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zurbuchen, T.H., Gloeckler, G., Ipavich, F., Raines, J., Smith, C.W., and Fisk, L.A.: 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L11805.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanqiong Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, Y., Wei, F., Feng, X. et al. Prediction Test for the Two Extremely Strong Solar Storms in October 2003. Sol Phys 234, 363–377 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0091-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0091-8

Keywords

Navigation