Abstract
We compare six algorithms for the computation of nonlinear force-free (NLFF) magnetic fields (including optimization, magnetofrictional, Grad–Rubin based, and Green's function-based methods) by evaluating their performance in blind tests on analytical force-free-field models for which boundary conditions are specified either for the entire surface area of a cubic volume or for an extended lower boundary only. Figures of merit are used to compare the input vector field to the resulting model fields. Based on these merit functions, we argue that all algorithms yield NLFF fields that agree best with the input field in the lower central region of the volume, where the field and electrical currents are strongest and the effects of boundary conditions weakest. The NLFF vector fields in the outer domains of the volume depend sensitively on the details of the specified boundary conditions; best agreement is found if the field outside of the model volume is incorporated as part of the model boundary, either as potential field boundaries on the side and top surfaces, or as a potential field in a skirt around the main volume of interest. For input field (B) and modeled field (b), the best method included in our study yields an average relative vector error En = 〈 |B−b|〉/〈 |B|〉 of only 0.02 when all sides are specified and 0.14 for the case where only the lower boundary is specified, while the total energy in the magnetic field is approximated to within 2%. The models converge towards the central, strong input field at speeds that differ by a factor of one million per iteration step. The fastest-converging, best-performing model for these analytical test cases is the Wheatland, Sturrock, and Roumeliotis (2000) optimization algorithm as implemented by Wiegelmann (2004).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aly, J.J.: 1989, Solar Phys. 120, 19.
Amari, T., Boulmezaoud, T.Z., and Aly, J.J.: 2005, Astron. Astrophys., in press. Author: Please update Amari, Boulmezaoud, and Aly (2005); Wiegelmann, Inhester, and Sakurai (2005b); and Yan and Li (2005).
Amari, T., Boulmezaoud, T.Z., and Mikić, Z.: 2006, Astron. Astrophys. 446, 691.
Amari, T., Aly, J.J., Luciani, J.F., Boulmezaoud, T.Z., and Mikić, Z.: 1997, Solar Phys. 174, 129.
Bleybel, A., Amari, T., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., and Leka, K.D.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 395, 685.
Chiu, Y.T. and Hilton, H.H.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 212, 873.
Dedner, A., Kemm, F., Kröner, D., Munz, T., and Wesenberg, M.: 2002, J. Comp. Phys. 175, 645.
Gary, G.A.: 1989, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 69, 323.
Gary, G.A.: 2001, Solar Phys. 203, 71.
Grad, H. and Rubin, H.: 1958, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Confenrence on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Vol. 31, United Nations, Geneva, 190.
Leka, K.D. and Skumanich, A.: 1999, Solar Phys. 188, 3.
Li, Z., Yan, Y., and Song, G.: 2004, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 347, 1255.
Liu, Y., Zhao, X.P., Hoeksema, J.T., Scherrer, P.H., Wang, J., and Yan, Y.: 2002, Solar Phys. 206, 333.
Low, B.C. and Lou, Y.Q.: 1990, Astrophys. J. 352, 343.
Marder, B.: 1987, J. Comp. Phys. 131, 48.
McClymont, A.N., Jiao, L., and Mikić, Z.: 1997, Solar Phys. 174, 191.
McClymont, A.N. and Mikić, Z.: 1994, Astrophys. J. 422 899.
Metcalf, T.R.: 1994, Solar Phys. 155, 235.
Metcalf, T.R., Jiao, L., McClymont, A.N., Alexander, N., Canfield, R.C., and Uitenbroek, H.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 439, 474.
Régnier, S. and Amari, T.: 2004, Astron. Astrophys. 425, 345.
Régnier, S., Amari, T., and Kersalé, E.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 392, 1119.
Roumeliotis, G.: 1996, Astrophys. J. 473, 1095.
Sakurai, T.: 1981, Solar Phys. 69, 343.
Schrijver, C.J., De Rosa, M.L., Title, A.M., and Metcalf, T.R.: 2005, Astrophys. J. 628, 501.
Schrijver, C.J., Title, A.M., Berger, T.E., Fletcher, L., Hurlburt, N.E., Nightingale, R., Shine, R.A., Tarbell, T.D., Wolfson, J., Golub, L., Bookbinder, J.A., DeLuca, E.E., McMullen, R.A., Warren, H.P., Kankelborg, C.C., Handy, B.N., and De Pontieu, B.: 1999, Solar Phys. 187, 261.
Seehafer, N.: 1978, Solar Phys. 58, 215.
Valori, G., Kliem, B., and Keppens, R.: 2005, Astron. Astrophys. 433, 335.
Wang, H., Yan, Y., Sakurai, T., and Zhang, M.: 2000, Solar Phys. 197, 263.
Wheatland, M.S.: 2004, Solar Phys. 222, 247.
Wheatland, M.S., Sturrock, P.A., and Roumeliotis, G.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 540, 1150.
Wiegelmann, T.: 2004, Solar Phys.219, 87.
Wiegelmann, T. and Inhester, B.: 2003, Solar Phys. 214, 287.
Wiegelmann, T., Inhester, B., and Sakurai, T.: 2005, Solar Phys., in press.
Wiegelmann, T., Inhester, B., Lagg, A., and Solanki, S.K.: 2005a, Solar Phys. 228, 67.
Wiegelmann, T., Lagg, A., Solanki, S. K., Inhester, B., and Woch, J.: 2005b, Astron. Astrophys. 433, 701.
Yan, Y. and Li, Y.: 2006, Astrophys. J. 638, 1162.
Yan, Y. and Liu, Y.: 1995, Publ. Beijing Astron. Obs. 27, 11.
Yan, Y. and Sakurai, T.: 1997, Solar Phys. 174, 65.
Yan, Y., Deng, Y., Karlický, M., Fu, Q., Wang, S., and Liu, Y.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 551, L115.
Yan, Y. and Sakurai, T.: 2000, Solar Phys. 195, 89.
Yang, W.H., Sturrock, P.A., and Antiochos, S.K.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 309, 383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schrijver, C.J., Derosa, M.L., Metcalf, T.R. et al. Nonlinear Force-Free Modeling of Coronal Magnetic Fields Part I: A Quantitative Comparison of Methods. Sol Phys 235, 161–190 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0068-7
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0068-7