Solar Physics

, Volume 229, Issue 2, pp 373–386 | Cite as

Predictions of Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity Deduced from that of Sunspot Number

  • P. LantosEmail author


A new method is proposed to predict cosmic ray intensity and solar modulation parameters. The method is coupled with the McNish and Lincoln method, which predicts first smoothed sunspot numbers. The error achieved is estimated and compared with the same chain of predictions using two other methods developed for US and Russian space applications. The three methods give satisfactory results when applied, for example, to prediction of the dose received on-board commercial aeroplane flights.


Satisfactory Result Sunspot Number Modulation Parameter Space Application Solar Modulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Badhwar, G. D.: 2001, private communication.Google Scholar
  2. Badhwar, G. D. and O'Neill, P. M.: 1993, 23th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 3, 535.Google Scholar
  3. Badhwar, G. D. and O'Neill, P. M.: 1996, Adv. Space Res. 17(2), 7.ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Badhwar, G. D., O'Neill, P. M., Cucinotta, F. A., and Weyland, M.: 1995, 24th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 4, 1118.Google Scholar
  5. Commission of European Communities Council Directive 96/29/Euratom/ of 13 May 1996, Official Journal of EC, Series L, No 159 of 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Conway, A. J.: 1998, New Astron. Rev. 42, 343.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Fessant, F., Pierret, C., and Lantos, P.: 1996, Solar Phys. 168, 423.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Freidberg, W., Copeland, K., Duke, F. E., O'Brien, K., and Darden, E. B.: 1999, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 86, 323.Google Scholar
  9. Hildner, E. and Greer, M. S.: 1989, Proc. Solar-Terrestrial Prediction Workshop, Leura, Australia, October 16–20 1989, SEL, NOAA, Boulder, U.S.A., p. 689.Google Scholar
  10. Lantos, P. and Fuller, N.: 2004, IEEE Trans. Plasma Phys. 32(4), 1468.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Lantos, P. and Richard, O.: 1998, Solar Phys. 182, 231CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Lantos, P., Fuller, N., and Bottollier Depois, J.-F.: 2003, Aviation, Space and Environmental Medecine, Vol. 74, No. 7, p. 746.Google Scholar
  13. McNish, A. G. and et Lincoln, J. V.: 1950, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 30, 637.Google Scholar
  14. Nymmik, R. A., Panasyuk, M. I., and et Suslov, A. A.: 1996, Adv. Space Res. 17, (2)19.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O'Brien, K.: 1971, Nuovo Cimento A3, 52.Google Scholar
  16. Schraube, H.: 2003, private communication.Google Scholar
  17. Schraube, H., Mares, V., Roesler, S., and Heinrich, W., 1999, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 86, 309.Google Scholar
  18. Sunspot Index Data Center web site:
  19. Stewart, F. G. and Ostrow, S. M.: 1970, J. des télécommunications 37, 228.Google Scholar
  20. Waldmeier, M.: 1968, Astron. Mitt. Eidgenossischen Sternwarte Zürich, 286, 1.Google Scholar
  21. Zhan Qin: 1996, Astron. Astrophys. 310, 646.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Observatoire De MeudonMeudonFrance

Personalised recommendations