Solar Physics

, Volume 228, Issue 1–2, pp 97–117 | Cite as

Advanced Automated Solar Filament Detection And Characterization Code: Description, Performance, And Results

  • Pietro N. Bernasconi
  • David M. Rust
  • Daniel Hakim
Article

Abstract

We present a code for automated detection, classification, and tracking of solar filaments in full-disk Hα images that can contribute to Living With a Star science investigations and space weather forecasting. The program can reliably identify filaments; determine their chirality and other relevant parameters like filament area, length, and average orientation with respect to the equator. It is also capable of tracking the day-by-day evolution of filaments while they travel across the visible disk. The code was tested by analyzing daily Hα images taken at the Big Bear Solar Observatory from mid-2000 until beginning of 2005. It identified and established the chirality of thousands of filaments without human intervention. We compared the results with a list of filament proprieties manually compiled by Pevtsov, Balasubramaniam and Rogers (2003) over the same period of time. The computer list matches Pevtsov's list with a 72% accuracy. The code results confirm the hemispheric chirality rule stating that dextral filaments predominate in the north and sinistral ones predominate in the south. The main difference between the two lists is that the code finds significantly more filaments without an identifiable chirality. This may be due to a tendency of human operators to be biased, thereby assigning a chirality in less clear cases, while the code is totally unbiased. We also have found evidence that filaments obeying the chirality rule tend to be larger and last longer than the ones that do not follow the hemispherical rule. Filaments adhering to the hemispheric rule also tend to be more tilted toward the equator between latitudes 10 and 30, than the ones that do not.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C. W.: 2000, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 362.Google Scholar
  2. Aulanier, G. and Démoulin, P.: 1998, Astron. Astrophys. 329, 1125.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Aulanier, G., Srivastava, N., and Martin, S. F.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 543, 477.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, M. A.: 1999, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 41, B167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denker, C., Johannesson, A., Marquette, W., Goode, P., Wang, H., and Zirin, H.: 1999, Solar Phys. 184, 87.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao, J., Wang, H., and Zhou, M.: 2002, Solar Phys. 205, 93.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert, H. R., Holzer, T. E., Burkepile, J. T., and Hundhausen, A. J.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 537, 503.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Gopalswamy, N., Shimojo, M., Lu, W., Yashiro, S., Shibasaki, K., and Howard, R. A.: 2003, Astrophys. J. 586, 562.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Jing, J., Yurchyshyn, V. B., Yang, G., Xu, Y., and Wang, H.: 2004, Astrophys. J. 614, 1054.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Kégl, B., Krzyżak, A., Linder, T., and Zeger, K.: 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel. 22, 281.Google Scholar
  11. Low, B. C. and Hundhausen, J. R.: 1994, Astrophys. J. 443, 818.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, S. F.: 1998, Solar Phys. 182, 107.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin, S. F., Bilimoria, R., and Tracadas, P. V.: 1994, in R. Rutten and C. Schrijvers (eds.), Solar Surface Magnetism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 303.Google Scholar
  14. Pevtsov, A. A., Balasubramaniam, K. S., and Rogers, J. W.: 2003, Astrophys. J. 595, 500.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Priest, E. R., Hood, A. W., and Anzer, U.: 1989, Astrophys. J. 344, 1010.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Rust, D. M. and Kumar, A.: 1994, Solar Phys. 155, 69.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Rust, D. M. and Martin, S. F.: 1994, in Y. Uchida, T. Kosugi, and H. S. Hudson (eds.), Magnetodynamic Phenomena in the Solar Atmosphere: Prototypes of Stellar Magnetic Activity, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 68, p. 337.Google Scholar
  18. Rust, D. M., Anderson, B. J., Andrews, M. D., Acuña, M. H., Russell, C. T., Schuck, P. W., and Mulligan, T.: 2005, Astrophys. J. 621, 524.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Shih, F. Y. and Kowalski, A. J.: 2003, Solar Phys. 218, 99.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. van Ballegooijen, A. A.: 2004, Astrophys. J. 612, 519.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. van Ballegooijen, A. A. and Martens, P. C. H.: 1989, Astrophys. J. 343, 971.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Yurchyshyn, V. B., Wang, H., Goode, P. R., and Deng, Y.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 563, 381.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Zharkova, V. V., Aboudarham, J., Zharkov, S. I., Ipson, S. S., Benkhalil, A. K., and Fuller, N.: 2004, in American Geophysics Union, Fall Meeting 2004, abstract #SH52A-04.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pietro N. Bernasconi
    • 1
  • David M. Rust
    • 1
  • Daniel Hakim
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Physics LaboratoryJohns Hopkins UniversityLaurelU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations