Advertisement

Sociological Forum

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 659–691 | Cite as

Gender and Value Orientations—What’s the Difference!? The Case of Japan and the United States

  • Tania Levey
  • Catherine B. Silver
Original Paper

This paper analyzes gendered social identity in Japan and the United States, countries with comparable postindustrial economic systems but distinct cultural traditions. Using national surveys (1995), we find gender differences in value orientations to be neither systematic nor consistent. They often disappeared after controlling for demographic and human-capital variables, though not so often for Japan. Other variables proved more important predictors of values than gender, although in different ways in Japan and the United States. We conclude by reassessing the use of the term gender in social research and the cultural meaning of gender relations by addressing the feminist concerns with issues of gender location.

KEY WORDS

value orientations social identity gender cross-cultural survey Japan and the United States 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge the support of Brooklyn College for giving Catherine Silver release time from teaching and the PSC-CUNY Research Foundation for awarding her a grant (#64682-00-33). We also want to thank Dr. Robert Butler and Dr. Ideo Ibe of International Longevity Center for making the data available. Special thanks to Vered Kraus and Seymour Spilerman for guiding us in this research process and providing input for the statistical analysis; to Marissa Levey and Kirsten Christiansen for their editing suggestions; and to Yoshio Shibata and Akiko Okada Shimizu, graduate students in the Ph.D. Program in Sociology at the CUNY Graduate Center, for their willingness to be informants in this research. We finally want to thank the Sociological Forum reviewers for their insightful and persistent methodological, theoretical, and editorial suggestions.

REFERENCES

  1. Amano, Masako (ed.)2001 A New Study of the Baby–Boomer Generation: Toward Relational Independence (Dankai-sedai Shinron: “Kankeiteki Jiritsu” o Hiraku). Tokyo: Yushindo Kobunsha; Lute Foundation Books.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Margaret, and Patricia Hill Collins (eds.)2004 Race, Class and Gender. New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Baca-Zinn, Maxine, and Bonnie Thornton Dill1996 “Theorizing differences from multiracial feminism.” Feminist Studies 22(2):321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauvoir, Simone de1970 [1952]  The Second Sex, trans. H. M. Parshkey. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, Jessica1988 The Bonds of Love. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  6. 1995 Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Differences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berrington, Ann2002 “Exploring reciprocal relationships between entry into parenthood and gender role attitudes: Evidence from the British Household Panel Study.” In Ron Lesthaeghe (ed.), Meaning and Choice: Value Orientations and Life Course Decisions: 307–335. The Hague: NIDI/CBGS Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Beutel, Ann, and Margaret Mooney Marini1995 “Gender and values.” American Sociological Review 60:436–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, Francine, Mary Brinton, and David Grusky2005 The Declining Significance of Gender? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, Wendy2003 “Gender in Counter Point.” Feminist Theory 4(3):365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bumiller, Elisabeth1995 The Secrets of Mariko. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, Judith1999 Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Calhoun, Craig1995 Critical Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Chafe, William H.1991 The Paradox of Change: American Women in the 20th Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chodorow, Nancy1978 The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cleaver, Charles Grinnell1976 Japanese and Americans: Cultural Parallels and Paradoxes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, Patricia Hill2000 “It is all in the Family: Intersection of Gender, Race, and Nation.” In Uma Narayan and Sandra Harding (eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Post Colonial, and Feminist World: 156–176. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, R. W.1987 Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Crenshaw, Kimberle1991 “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, politics and violence against women of color.” Stanford Law Review 43(6):1241–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deaux, Kay, and Brenda Major1990 “A social-psychological model of gender.” In D. Rhode (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Gender: 89–99. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Eagly, Alice1995 “The science and politics of comparing women and men.” American Psychologist 30:145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. England, Paula (ed.)1993 Theory on Gender: Feminism on Theory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs1999 “Similarities and differences: The sociology of gender distinctions.” In Janet Saltzman Chafetz (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Gender: 45–61. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Frodi, Ann, Jacqueline Macaulay, and Pauline Robert Thome1977 “Are women always less aggressive than men? Review of experimental literature.” Psychological Bulletin 84(4):634–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gelb, Joyce2003 Gender Policies in Japan and the United States: Comparing Women’s Movements, Rights and Politics. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  26. Gerson, Kathleen1993 No Man’s Land: Men’s Changing Commitments to Family and Work. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Gilligan, Carol1982 In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grusky, David2001 Stratification: Class, Race and Gender. 2nd edition. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  29. Goode, William1993 World Change in Divorce Patterns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hashimoto, Akiko1996 The Gift of Generations: Japanese and American Perspective on Aging and the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hayashi, Chikio, and Yasumasa Kuroda1997 Japanese Culture in Contemporary Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. Hochschild, Arlie Russell2003 The Second Shift. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Inglehart, Ronald2000 “Globalization and postmodern values.” Washington Quarterly 23(1):215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris2003 Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Inkeles, Alex1996 National Character: A Psycho-Social Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  36. Ishida, Hiroshi1993 Social Mobility in Contemporary Japan: Educational Credentials, Class and the Labor Market in a Cross-National Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, Frank A.1993 Dependency and Japanese Socialization: Psychoanalytic and Anthropological Investigation into Amae. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kalleberg, Arne L., and James R. Lincoln1988 “The structure of earning inequality in the U.S. and Japan.” American Journal of Sociology 94:5121–5153.Google Scholar
  39. Kimoto, Kinoshita1995 Family, Gender, and Corporate Society (Kazoku, Jenda, Kigyo–shakai). Tokyo: Mineruba Shobo.Google Scholar
  40. 2000 “Changes in corporate society and family (Kigyoshakai no Henka to Kazoku).” Japanese Journal of Family Sociology 12(1):27–40.Google Scholar
  41. Kohn, Melvin L., and Carmi Schooler1982 “Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of their reciprocal effects.” American Journal of Sociology 87:1257–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liefbroer, Art C.2002 “Change in adult role attitudes during young adulthood: The impact of age and role change”. In Ron Lesthaeghe (ed), Meaning and Choice: Value Orientations and Life Course Decisions: 273–230. The Hague: NIDI/CBGS Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Lever, Janet1978 “Sex differences in the complexity of children’s play and games.” American Sociological Review 43:471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lorber, Judith2005a Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  45. 2005b Breaking the Bowls: Degendering and Feminist Change. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  46. Lueptow, Lloyd2001 “Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997.” Social Forces 80(1):1–36.Google Scholar
  47. Maccoby, Eleanor, and Carol Jacklin1974 The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. McCall, Leslie2001 “Sources of racial wage inequality in metropolitan labor markets: Racial, ethnic and gender differences.” American Sociological Review 66(4):520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 2005 “The complexity of intersectionality.” Signs 3(3):1771–1800.Google Scholar
  50. Mackie, Vera2003 Gender in Japan: Power and Public Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Marini, Margaret Mooney1990 “Sex and Gender: What do We Know?” Sociological Forum 5:95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maume, David J.1999 “Occupational segregations and the career mobility of white men and women.” Social Forces 77:1433–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moors, Guy2002 “Reciprocal relations between gender role values and family formation.” In Ron Lesthaeghe (ed.), Meaning and Choice: Value Orientations and Life Course Decisions: 218–250. The Hague: NIDI/CBGS Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Nisbett, Richard E.2003 The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently … and Why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pascarella, Ernest, and Patrick Terenzini1991 How College Affects Students: Findings and Insight from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: JosseyBass.Google Scholar
  56. Prince-Gibson, Eetta, and Shalom Schwartz2003 “Value Priorities and Gender”. Unpublished paper. Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  57. Reskin, Barbara1993 “Sex segregation in the workplace.” Annual Review of Sociology 19:241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ridgeway, Cecilia1993 “Gender, status, and the social psychology of expectations.” In Paula England (ed.), Theory on Gender/ Feminism on Theory: 175–198. New York: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rosenfeld, Rachel2002 “What do we learn about difference from the scholarship on gender?” Social Forces 81(1):1–24.Google Scholar
  60. Rubin, Gayle1975 “The traffic in women: Notes on the political economy of sex.” In Rayna Rapp (ed.), Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, Shalom H.1992 “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.” In Mark Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25:1–65. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky2003 Touching Feeling: Affect Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sevenhuijsen, Selma2003 “The place of care: The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy.” Feminist Theory 4(3):179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shibata, Yoshio2006 “A Sociological History of Salarymen and Japan's Modernization.” PhD Dissertation in the Sociology Program at the CUNY Graduate Center.Google Scholar
  65. Silver, Catherine2002 “Japanese and American identities: Values and their transmission in the family.” Sociological Inquiry 72(2):195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Silver, Catherine, and Charlotte Muller1997 “Effects of ascribed and achieved characteristics on social values in Japan and the United States.” Research in Stratification and Mobility 15:153–176.Google Scholar
  67. Spilerman, Seymour, and Trond Peterson1999 “Organizational structure, determinants of promotion, and gender differences in attainment.” Social Science Research 28:203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stoetzel, Jean1983 Les Valeurs du Temps Présent: Une Enquête Européenne. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  69. Struch, Naomi, and Shalom Schwartz2002 “Meaning and basic values for women and men: A cross-cultural analysis.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(1):16–28.Google Scholar
  70. Sugimoto, Yoshio1997 An Introduction to Japanese Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Unger, Rhoda1992 “Will the real sex differences please stand up?” Feminism and Psychology 2:231–238.Google Scholar
  72. Ward, Kathleen1993 “Reconceptualizing world system theory to include women.” In Paula England (ed.), Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory: 43–68. New York: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
  73. West, Candace, and Sarah Fenstermaker1995 “Doing difference.” Gender and Society 1:8–37.Google Scholar
  74. White, Mary1992 “Home truth: Women and social change in Japan.” Daedalus 121:61–82.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, John, and Deborah Best1990 Sex and Psyche: Gender and Self Viewed Cross-Culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Wright, Erik Olin, and Janeen Baxter1995 “The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study.” American Sociological Review 60(3):407–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yancey, Martin2004 “Gender as social institution.” Social Forces 82:1249–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesYork CollegeJamaicaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyBrooklyn College and the Graduate Center, CUNYBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations