Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marital Status and Gender Inequality in Household Income Among Older Adults in Israel: Changes Over time

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marital status has long been associated with social and economic vulnerability, namely unmarried individuals were seen as more vulnerable than the married. The current study examines gender inequalities in household income among older Israeli widowed, divorced, and never-married individuals. Israel provides an interesting case for examining the distinction between different marital statuses over time due to demographic, socioeconomic and policy changes that transpired during three distinct decades—the early 1990s, early 2000s, and early 2010s. We found that the unmarried have lower household income as compared to the married; however, in terms of income per capita, unmarried men appear to have higher income than that of married men, in contrast to unmarried women—particularly those divorced and widowed—who are clearly at a disadvantage as compared to married women and to men in general. We also found that over time, gender inequality increased among the divorced but decreased among the widowed. Sociodemographic changes as well as transformations in the Israeli labor market, welfare state and pension schemes explain our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the past, Israeli housewives were not allowed to insure themselves in the public pension system. For a short period housewives were entitled to voluntarily insure themselves, but most of them chose not to do so (Gal, 2014). Since 1996, nonworking married women are automatically insured in the public pension system (Gal, 2014, 48).They nonetheless receive only a reduced old-age annuity as compared to the others insured because they are not entitled to a seniority supplement.

  2. In Israel, employees are entitled to pension contributions only during the period of their paid maternity leave.

  3. We tested for differences in the distribution of our focal variables within each period. The comparison showed no significant differences (data available from the author/s).

  4. The Israeli CBS defines head of household by amount of economic activity, so that the person who contributes more hours of work per week is considered the head. In households where no one works for pay, the head of household is self-identified.

  5. The calculation was based on men and women heads of household, 75 years old, with high school education, who did not work for pay, had no additional earners in the household, had income from pensions and were not born in Israel.

References

  • Achdut, N., & Stier, H. (2016). Long-term employment and earnings patterns of welfare recipients: The role of the local labor market. Social Service Review, 90(4), 647–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addi-Raccah, A., & Mcdossi, O. (2009). Trends in Gender Inequality in Field of Study in the Higher Education System. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz and I. Oplatka (eds.), Gender and Ethnicity in the Israeli Academy, Pardes Publishers.

  • Ahn, N. (2005). Financial consequences of widowhood in Europe: Cross-country and gender differences. ENEPRI Working Paper, No. 32.

  • Andreß, H. J., Borgloh, B., Bröckel, M., Giesselmann, M., & Hummelsheim, D. (2006). The economic consequences of partnership dissolution: A comparative analysis of panel studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain,Italy and Sweden. European Sociological Review, 22(5), 533–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angel, J. L., Jiménez, M. A., & Angel, R. J. (2007). The economic consequences of widowhood for older minority women. The Gerontologist, 47, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/47.2.224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biro, A. (2013). Adverse effects of widowhood in Europe. Advances in Life Course Research, 18(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisom-Rapp, S., & Sargeant, M. (2016). Lifetime Disadvantage, Discrimination and the Gendered Workforce. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., Lee, G. R., & Bulanda, J. R. (2006). Cohabitation among older adults: A national portrait. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.2.S71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Wright, M. R. (2017). Marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in later life. Innovation in Ageing, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butrica, B. A., & Smith, K. E. (2012). The retirement prospects of divorced women. Social Security Bulletin, 72, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS, Central Bureau of Statistics. (2020a). International Senior Citizen's Day 2020: Selected Data on Various Topics Regarding Israeli Senior Citizens Aged 65 and Over

  • CBS, Central Bureau of Statistics. (2020b). Life Expectancy, (1) by Sex, Religion and Population. Group, 3, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS, Central Bureau of Statistics. (2020c). Persons Aged 15 and over, by Religion. Marital Status, Sex and Age, 2, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS, Central Bureau of Statistics. (2012). First Degree Students in Universities, Academic Colleges and Colleges of Education, by Field of Study

  • Cooper, R., & Baird, M. (2015). Bringing the ‘Right to Request’ Flexible working arrangements to life: From policies to practices. Employee Relations, 37(5), 568–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and the social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewilde, C., & Stier, H. (2014). Homeownership in later life—does divorce matter? Advances in Life Course Research, 20, 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F., & Shippee, T. P. (2009). Aging and cumulative inequality: How does inequality get under the skin? The Gerontologist, 49, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S. (1996). The poverty of euality: Pensions and the ECJ. Industrial Law Journal, 25, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. H. (2010). Baby boomers and their new demographics of American’s seniors. Generations, 34, 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaifman, Y. (1992). Dividing pension rights between divorced parties. Hapraklit, 41, 105–137. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, J. (2014). Social Security in Israel. Jerusalem. Magnes. (Hebrew).

  • Gavious, I., Spivak, A., & Yosef, R. (2009). Pension Reform in Israel under Mandatory Pension Law. Pensions: An International Journal, 14 (1), 4–13.

  • Ginn, J. (2004). European pension privatization: Taking account of gender. Social Policy and Society, 3(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, K., Price, D., Willis, R., Stuchbury, R., & Nicholls, M. (2009). Life Course Influences and Well-being in Later Life: A Review. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.

  • Goldblatt, B. (2016). Developing the Right to Social Security—A Gender Perspective. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, B., & Lamarche, L. (2014). Women’s Rights to Social Security and Social Protection. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, J. (2015). Gendering pensions: Making women visible. Gender, Work & Organization, 22, 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington Meyer, M., Wolf, D. A., & Himes, C. L. (2005). Linking benefits to marital status: Race and social security in the US. Feminist Economics, 11(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, K. C., & Kuo, H.-H.D. (1996). Complex marital histories and economic well-being: The continuing legacy of divorce and widowhood as the HRS cohort approaches retirement. The Gerontologist, 36, 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/36.3.383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. E., & O’Rand, A. M. (2004). The lives and times of the baby boomers. Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2007). The aging of the second demographic transition. In K. Warner Schaie & P. Uhlenberg (Eds.), Social structures: The impact of demographic changes on the well-being of older persons (pp. 179–211). NY: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Marital biography and health at mid-life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, M., Mortelmans, D., & Snoeckx, L. (2009). Repartnering and (re)employment: Strategies to cope with the economic consequences of partnership dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1271–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. W., & Favreault, M. M. (2004). Economic status in later life among women who raised children outside of marriage. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.6.S315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimhi, A. & Shraberman, K. (2013). Employment and Income Trends among Older Israelis. In Dan Ben-David (ed.), State of the Nation Report – Society, Economy and Policy 2013, Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel.

  • Kimhi, A. (2012). Labor market trends: employment rate and wage disparities. In: Ben-David, D. (Ed.), State of the Nation Report: Society, Economy and Policy 2011 2012. Taub Center, Jerusalem, pp 23–160.

  • Kreider, RM., & Ellis, R. (2011). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2009 (Current Population Reports; pp. P70–P125). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Lewin, A., & Stier, H. (2018). Marital status, gender, and material hardship: Evidence from Israel. Advances in Life Course Research, 35, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lifshitz, S. (2016). Spousal Property. Bar Ilan University Press. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, I.-F., & Brown, S. L. (2012). Unmarried boomers confront old age: A National Portrait. The Gerontologist, 52(2), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, L. (2018a). Pension privatisation—benefits and costs. Industrial Law Journal, 47(3), 399–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, L. (2018b). Pension Privatization in Israel. In Amir Paz-Fuchs, Ronen Mandelkern, Itzhak Galnoor (eds.) The Privatization of Israel: The Withdrawal of State Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S., & Curto, V. (2010). Financial literacy among the young. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 358–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2010). Division of Pension Assets between Divorced Parties. Committee Report (Hebrew)

  • Myers-JDC-Brookdale. (2018). People Aged 65 + in Israel. https://brookdale.jdc.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/MJB-Facts_and_Figures_Elderly-65_in_Israel-2018_Hebrew.pdf

  • Nathanson, R., Gazala, I., & Porat, M. (2017). Single-Parent Families in Israel. Macro—The Center for Political Economics. http://www.macro.org.il/en/publications/?id=146

  • NII Website (2020). National Insurance Institute of Israel Website, Old Age Benefits https://www.btl.gov.il/English%20Homepage/Benefits/Old%20Age%20Insurance/Pages/default.aspx

  • OECD. (2010). Reviews of Labour Market and Social Policies in Israel. OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. (2007). Closing the gender gap in retirement income: What difference will recent UK pension reforms make? Journal of Social Policy., 36(4), 561–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratson, M. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs, political constructions and windows of opportunity: The politics of the second pension reform in Israel. Israeli Sociology., 11(2), 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y., & Bronstein, V. (2011). Education reform and narrowing educational gaps in Israel. In D. Ben David (Ed.), State of the nation report: Society, economy and policy 2010 (pp. 247–263). Jerusalem: Taub Center.

  • Shilton, E. (2012). Insuring inequality: Sex-based mortality tables and women’s retirement income. Queen’s l. J., 37, 383–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. (1993). The economic costs of marital disruption for young women over the past two decades. Demography, 30, 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, H., & Endeweld, M. (2015). Employment transitions and labor market exits: Age and gender in the Israeli labor market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 41(September), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, H., Lewin-Epstein, N., & Braun, M. (2018). Institutional change and women’s work patterns along the family life course. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 57, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2018.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, H., & Herzberg, E. (2013). Women in the labor force: The impact of education on employment patterns and wages. In D. Ben David (Ed.), State of the nation report: Society, economy and policy 2013 (pp. 201–232). Jerusalem: Taub Center.

  • Stier, H. (2011). Welfare and employment among single mothers in Israel from a comparative perspective. In D. Ben David (Ed.). State of the nation report: Society, economy and policy 2010 (pp. 181–200). Jerusalem: Taub Center.

  • Van der Lippe, T., & Van Dijk, L. (2002). Comparative research on women’s employment. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschot, W. (2004). Flexible work and flexicurity policies in the Netherlands, trends and experience. Transfer: European Review of Labour Research, 10(2), 208–225

  • Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology and Space, grant no. 3-14765.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilach Lurie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lilach Lurie A member of the Herczeg Institute on Aging

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lurie, L., Stier, H. Marital Status and Gender Inequality in Household Income Among Older Adults in Israel: Changes Over time. Soc Indic Res 159, 801–820 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02781-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02781-w

Keywords

Navigation