Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Gaps in Care Work: Evidences from Argentina, Chile, Spain and Uruguay

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a comparative analysis of the gender gaps in the non-paid domestic and care work (NPDCW) undertaken in homes in Argentina, Chile, Spain and Uruguay. The explanatory factors of this gap in two-income households and their magnitude and impact on the distribution of NPDCW are analyzed using data from national time use surveys. The weakness of micro-sociological approaches and the variables related to relative resources and time availability is demonstrated using the estimation of a regression model, while the importance of approximations of gender roles and analyses that incorporate macro-sociological factors is shown. Furthermore, the findings show that NPDCW is done by women in 70% of cases with women’s incomes and time availability among the individual variables that drive change within the couple. The results show that the equalizing effects of time availability and gender ideology are stronger for women in more egalitarian countries; women in less egalitarian countries benefit less from their individual-level assets. Additional comparative analysis shows that other macro-level factors (economic development, female labor-force participation, gender norms and welfare systems) may also influence the division of this work. The results suggest that changes in individual-level factors alone may not be enough to achieve an equal division of labor in the household without a parallel reduction in macro-level gender inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Times of paid work and NPDCW performed by other household members are excluded.

References

  • Aguirre, R., & Ferrari, F. (2014). Las encuestas sobre uso del tiempo y trabajo no remunerado en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajenjo, M., & García, J. (2011). El tiempo productivo, reproductivo y de ocio en las parejas de doble ingreso. Papers. Revista de Sociología, 96(3), 985–1006. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v96n3.183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, N., & Krzywinski, M. (2016). Regression diagnostics. Nature Methods, 13, 385–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra, A., Gálvez-Gálvez, C., & González-Flores, A. (2020). Do Spanish dual-earner couples share unpaid work equally? Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02346-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarante, V., & Rossel, C. (2017). Unfolding patterns of unpaid household work in Latin America. Feminist Economics, 24(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2017.1344776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonopoulos, R. (2008). The unpaid care work-paid work connection. Working Papers Series. Levy Economics Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1176661

  • Arriagada, I. (2007). Familias y políticas públicas en América Latina: Una historia de desencuentros. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bericat, E. (2011). The European gender equality index: Conceptual and analytical issues. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9872-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blofield, M., & Martínez, J. (2014). Trabajo, familia y cambios en las políticas públicas en América Latina: equidad. maternalismo y corresponsabilidad. Revista de la CEPAL (114): 107–125. https://doi.org/10.18356/d81c1957-es

  • Bose, Ch. (2015). Patterns of global gender inequalities and regional gender regimes. Gender & Society, 29(6), 767–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215607849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, M., & Jenkins, S. (2016). Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budlender, D. (2010). What do time use studies tell us about unpaid care work? Evidence from seven countries a time use studies and unpaid care work. Nueva York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campaña, J. C., Giménez-Nadal, J. I., & Molina, J. A. (2017). Gender norms and the gendered distribution of total work in Latin American households. Feminist Economics, 24(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2017.1390320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, C., & Domínguez, M. (2011). Family strategies for meeting care and domestic work needs: Evidence from Spain. Feminist Economics, 17(4), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.614625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, C., & Domínguez, M. (2014). Measured time, perceived time: A gender bias. Time and Society, 24(3), 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X14538917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. (2017). Repositorio de información sobre uso del tiempo de América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dema, S. (2006). Una pareja. dos salarios: El dinero y las relaciones de poder en las parejas de doble ingreso. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

  • Domínguez-Folgueras, M. (2012). «La división del trabajo doméstico en las parejas españolas. Un análisis de uso del tiempo». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70 (1), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2009.08.26.

  • Domínguez-Folgueras, M., Jurado-Guerrero, T., Botía-Morillas, C., & Amigot-Leache, P. (2016). “The house belongs to both”: undoing the gendered division of housework. Community, Work & Family, 20(4), 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2016.1192525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, M., Muñiz, L., & Rubilar, G. (2018). El trabajo doméstico y de cuidados en las parejas de doble ingreso. Análisis comparativo entre España, Argentina y Chile. Papers. Revista De Sociologia, 104(2), 337–374. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durán, M.A., & Milosavijevic, V. (2012). Unpaid work. time use surveys and care demand. Forecasting in Latin America. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.

  • Espejo, A., Filgueira, F., & Rico, M. N. (2010). Familias latinoamericanas: organización del trabajo no remunerado y de cuidado. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrant, G., Pesando, L. M., & Nowacka, K. (2014). Unpaid care work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcome. Ginebra: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontanella, L., Sarra, A., & Zio, Di. (2019). Do gender differences in social institutions matter in shaping gender equality in education and the labour market? Empirical evidences from developing countries. Berlin : Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02148-2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Francavilla, F., Giannelli, G., Mangiavacchi, L., & Piccoli, L. (2013). Unpaid work in Europe: Gender and country differences. In F. Bettio, J. Plantenga, & M. Smith (Eds.), Gender and European labour market. Abigdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review., 69, 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-López, M. J. (2001). Spouse’s employment careers in Spain. In H. P. Blossfeld & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Careers of couples in contemporary society: From male breadwinner to dual earner families. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-López, M.J; Jurado, T. (2009). ¿Cuándo se implican los hombres en las tareas domésticas? Un análisis de la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo. Panorama Social, 65–81

  • Hagqvist, E., Gådin, K. G., & Nordenmark, M. (2017). Work-Family Conflict and Well-Being Across Europe: The Role of Gender Context. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1301-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INE-Chile instituto nacional de estadísticas. (2016). ENUT Encuesta Nacional Sobre Uso del Tiempo. Documento Metodológico. Santiago de Chile: INE.

  • Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin. E., & Puranen, B., et al. (Eds.) (2014). World Values Survey: Round Six-Country-Pooled Datafile Version: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.

  • Instituto nacional de estadística español (INE). (2011). Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo 2009–2010. Metodología. Madrid: INE.

  • Instituto nacional de estadística y censos (INDEC). (2013). Encuesta sobre Trabajo no Remunerado y Uso del Tiempo Informe técnico. Diseño de registro y estructura de la base de microdatos. Buenos Aires: INDEC.

  • Instituto nacional de estadística del Uruguay. (2013). Uso del tiempo y trabajo no remunerado en Uruguay. Montevideo: INE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. Y., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: discerning the efects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killewald, A., & Gough, M. (2010). Money isn’t everything: Wives’ earnings and housework time. Social Science Research., 39(6), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S. (2007). Gender-related Indicators of Well-being. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Human well-being: Studies in development economics and policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, K., & Wearness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63, 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9797-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2010). Gender and welfare state change. European Societies, 4(4), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669022000022324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, S. (2015). The gendered division of housework time: Analysis of time use by type and daily frequency of household tasks. Time & Society, 26(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x15577269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurunnabi, A., & Imon, A. (2009). Applications of regression diagnostics in business economics and social sciences. The Business Review I, 1, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2015). El trabajo de cuidado no remunerado en Argentina: un análisis desde la evidencia del Módulo de Trabajo no Remunerado. Documentos de trabajo Políticas públicas y derecho al cuidado. ELA—Equipo Latinoamericano de Justicia y Género.

  • Sayer, L. (2010). Trends in housework. In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic Men women and household work in cross-national perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, F., & Grunow, D. (2011). Comparing diary and survey estimates on time use. European Sociological Review, 5(28), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevilla-Sanz, A., Giménez-Nadal, J. I., & Fernández, C. (2010). Gender roles and the division of unpaid work in Spanish households. Feminist Economics, 16(4), 137–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2010.531197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thébaud, S. (2010). Masculinity, bargaining and breadwinning: understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender & Society, 24(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210369105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, J. G. (2018). The adequacy of measures of gender roles attitudes: A review of current measures in omnibus surveys. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0491-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Gender Gap Report 2020. Cologny/Geneva: World Economic Forum.

  • Yu, J., & Xie, Y. (2014). The varying display of ‘gender display.’ Chinese Sociological Review, 2(44), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555440201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Màrius Domínguez-Amorós.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was compiled in the context of the INCASI Network, a European project that has received funding from the European Union H2020 research program, Marie Skłodowska-Curie GA No. 691004, coordinated by Dr. Pedro López-Roldán. The article reflects the opinion of the authors and the Agency is not responsible for the use that may be made of the information it contains.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Partials plots. Dependent variable by independent variables.

figure a

Appendix 2 Normality tests and normal probability plots (Q’Q)

 

Kolmogorov–Smirnov test

Age female

0.048***

Age male

0.047***

Hours paid work female

0.198***

Hours paid work male

0.289***

Nª minors in household

0.358***

Total hours of NPDCW

0.078***

  1. ***P-value < 0.01
  2. Sample: households made up of employed couples, who receive a wage for this work
  3. Source: Author’s own elaboration based on the Time Use Survey for Spain, INE (2010); the Non-Paid Work Survey for Argentina, INDEC (2013); the Time Use Survey for Chile, INE (2015) and the Time Use Survey for Uruguay (2013)
figure b

Appendix 3 Residuals analysis.

figure c

Partial graphics. Scatterplots of the residuals of each independent variable and the residuals of the dependent variable.

figure d
figure e

Appendix 4 VIF multiclolinearity diagnostics. Gender gaps in NPDCW

 

Tolerance

Variance inflation factor

(Constant)

0.617

1.622

Age female

0.493

2.029

Income female (log.)

0.783

1.277

Hours paid work female

0.900

1.111

Hours paid work male

0.509

1.966

Educat. level male basic

0.436

2.294

Educat. level male medium

0.458

2.186

Type of household child 0–4

0.613

1.632

Type of household child 5–9

0.564

1.773

Type of household child 10–19

0.603

1.659

Type of household child + 19

0.747

1.339

Socioprofessional female category 1

0.776

1.288

Socioprofessional male category 4

0.525

1.905

Socioprofessional y male category 1

0.810

1.235

Paid DCW

0.791

1.265

Contribution to the household income female > male

0.773

1.293

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domínguez-Amorós, M., Batthyány, K. & Scavino, S. Gender Gaps in Care Work: Evidences from Argentina, Chile, Spain and Uruguay. Soc Indic Res 154, 969–998 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02556-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02556-9

Keywords

Navigation