Abstract
The study of European Identity has gradually become central to social sciences in the past decades. The enlargement of the European Union, as well as the economic crises from a decade ago called into question the very idea of Europe as a polity, the legitimacy of the European project and the homogeneity of the European culture. Although many analyses study European Identity, most research focuses on the definition and measurement of European Identity within the EU member states. Due to the interest in European Identity within EU borders on the one hand, and the lack of comparable data on the other, the European Identity of all Europeans is rarely explored. To address this gap, we investigate the common understanding of Europeanness among those living in Europe. We define European Identity as ethnic/cultural identity as opposed to civic identity and analyse the measurement equivalence of the scale tapping European ethnic/cultural identity fielded by European Values Survey in 2017 in 30 European countries. The results point out to a common understanding of Europeanness among those living in Europe, in ethnic terms, not in cultural ones. Methodologically, the analyses proved that the scale is suitable for cross-national comparisons among countries, but the comparability should be refrained to comparing means of the scale across countries. The mode of data collection does not impact on the comparability of the scale in four of the six countries that used mixed modes of data collection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Details regarding LISS panel available at: https://www.lissdata.nl/about-panel.
References
Batt, J. (2001). European identity and national identity in Central and Eastern Europe. In H. Wallace (Ed.), Interlocking dimensions of European integration. One Europe or several? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bergbauer, S. (2018). Explaining European identity formation. Citizens’ attachment from Maastricht treaty to crisis. Cham: Springer.
Bourne, A. (2015). European identity: Conflict and cooperation. In K. Lynggaard, I. Manners, & K. Löfgren (Eds.), Research methods in European Union studies (Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445–455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brubaker, R. (2013). Language, religion and the politics of difference. Nations and Nationalism, 19(1), 1–20.
Bruter, M. (2003). Winning hearts and minds for Europe: The impact of news and symbols on civic and cultural European Identity. Comparative Political Studies, 36(10), 1148–1179.
Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe? The Emergence of a Mass European Identity. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bruter, M. (2008). Legitimacy, euroscepticism & identity in the European Union—Problems of measurement, modelling & paradoxical patterns of influence. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 4(4), 273–285.
Bruter, M. (2013). Measuring the immeasurable? In M. Bruter & M. Lodge (Eds.), Political science research methods in action (ECPR Research Methods) (pp. 25–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, application, and programming. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018.
Davidov, E. (2009). Measurement equivalence of nationalism and constructive patriotism in the ISSP: 34 countries in a comparative perspective. Political Analysis, 17, 64–82.
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(3), 1–21.
de Leeuw, E. D. (1992). Data quality in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys. Amsterdam: TT-publikaties. Retrieved 29 February 2010, from http://www.xs4all.nl/~edithl.
Delanty, G. (1997). Models of citizenship: Defining European identity and citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 1(3), 285–303.
Dorer, B. (2019). Outline of best practices for implementation of questionnaire translation approaches based on empirical findings. Deliverable 3.4 of the SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, GA No. 654221. Retrieved from www.seriss.eu/resources/deliverables.
Duchesne, S. (2008). Waiting for a European identity: Reflections on the process of identification with Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 9(4), 397–410.
European Comission. (1974). Seventh general report on the activities of the European Communities 1973. Brussels: Luxembourg.
EUROSTAT. (2020). Glossary: Commonwealth of independent states (CIS). Retrieved 20 February 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Commonwealth_of_Independent_States_(CIS).
Fan, Y. (2008). What makes the European identity? An empirical analysis of explanatory approaches. Asia Europe Journal, 6(3), 413–425.
Fuchs, D., & Schneider, C. (2011). Support for the EU and European identity. In D. Fuchs & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), Cultural diversity, European identity and the legitimacy of the EU (pp. 61–85). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
GESIS European Values Survey. (2019). Appendix D: Mixed-mode approach. Report related to the EVS 2017 integrated dataset ZA7500.
Gil-Kashiwabara, E. (2015). Ascribed and achieved status. In J. M. Bennett (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of intercultural competence. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement., 67, 1019–1041.
Guibernau, M. (2011). The birth of a united Europe: on why the EU has generated a ‘non-emotional’ identity. Nations and Nationalism, 17(2), 302–315.
Hanquinet, L., & Savage, M. (2011). Operationalisation of European identity, cosmopolitanism and cross-border practices. EUCROSS Working Paper, p. 2. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395749.
Herrmann, R., & Brewer, M. B. (2004). Identities and institutions: Becoming European in the EU. In R. K. Herrmann, T. Risse, & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 1–22). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hox, J. J., de Leeuw, E. D., & Klausch, T. (2015b). Mixed mode research: Issues in design and analysis. In P. Biemer et al. (Eds.), Total survey error in practice. New York: Wiley.
Hox, J. J., De Leeuw, E. D., & Zijlmans, E. A. O. (2015a). Measurement equivalence in mixed mode surveys. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(87), 1–11.
Hox, J. J., de Leeuw, E. D., & Zijlmans, E. A. O. (2015c). Measurement equivalence in mixed mode surveys. Frontiers in Psychology. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 86, 116–125.
Kania, V., & Karolewski, I. P. (2013). EU governance and European identity. Living Reviews in European Governance, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2013-1.
Kankaras, M., & Moors, G. (2010). Researching measurement equivalence in cross-cultural studies. Psihologija, 43(2), 121–136.
Kuhn, T. (2015). Experiencing European integration: transnational lives and European Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latcheva, R., Datler, G., & Rossbacher, E. (2012). The concept of European identity: Overused and underspecified? In S. Salzborn et al. (Eds.), Methods, theories, and Empirical applications in the social sciences. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Levoie, J. A., & Douglas, K. (2012). The perceived stress scale: Evaluating configural, metric and scalar invariance across mental health status and gender. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(1), 48–57.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.
Pickel, G., Pollack, D., & Muller, O. (2012). Differntiated secularization in Europe: Comparative results. In D. Pollack, O. Muller, & G. Pickel (Eds.), The Social Significance of Religion in the Enlarged Europe, Routledge, London & New York.
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90.
Quandt, M. et al. (2019). Project implementation report for web-based survey project management platform (SMaP). Deliverable D 4.12 of the SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, GA No. 654221. Retrieved from www.seriss.eu/resources/deliverables.
Risse, T. (2010). A community of Europeans? Transnational identities and public spheres. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Scalise, G. (2015). The narrative construction of European identity. Meanings of Europe ‘from below’. European Societies, 17(4), 593–614.
Senese, P. V., Bornstein, M. H., Haynes, O. M., Rossi, G., & Venuti, P. A. (2012). Cross-cultural comparison of mothers' beliefs about their parenting very young children. Infant Behaviour and Development, 35, 479–488.
Sinnott, R. (2005). An evaluation of the measurement of national, subnational and supranational identity in cross-national surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 211–223.
Spohn, W. (2009). Europeanization, Religion and Collective Identities in an Enlarging Europe: A Multiple Maternities Perspective. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(3), 358–374.
Triandafyllidou, A., & Wodak, R. (2003). Conceptual and methodological questions in the study of collective identities: An Introduction. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(2), 205–223.
Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492.
van de Vijer, F., & Tanzer, N. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, 54(1), 119–135.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
Verhaegen, S., Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2017). The effect of political trust and trust in European citizens on European Identity. European Political Science Review, 9(2), 161–181.
Voicu, B. (2019). Do differences in fieldwork period affect survey comparability? Examining world values survey and European values study in Romania, 2017–2018. Harmonization: Newsletter on Survey Data Harmonization in the Social Sciences, 5(2), 20–27.
Zimmer, O. (2003). Boundary mechanisms and symbolic resources: Towards a process-oriented approach to national identity. Nations and Nationalism, 9(2), 173–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voicu, M., Ramia, I. European Identity: An Analysis of Measurement Equivalence Across Countries and Mode of Data Collection in the European Values Survey 2017/2018. Soc Indic Res 154, 815–834 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02541-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02541-2