Abstract
Scientific interest in studying justifiability towards morally debatable behaviors across nations is considerable, but the statistical assessment of the issue has not been very rigorous so far. In fact, many authors measure the related constructs computing composite indicators of justifiability as unweighed averages of perceived justifiability towards morally debatable behaviors. Other than not allowing for different weights, another drawback is that even if the items have different variability, no transformation like the z score is typically applied before computing the average. Another major shortcoming of the available justifiability indexes is the lack of robustness analysis of the results, making their message weak. The aim of this paper is to design very general composite indicators of justifiability towards dishonest-illegal and personal-sexual behaviors without the shortcomings of the other indicators. The indexes are computed for a data set from the European Values Study covering 47 countries and regions. The results show that Sweden, Netherlands and Finland are the most permissive countries towards personal-sexual behaviors followed by other Western and Scandinavian countries, whereas the strictest countries are Kosovo and Turkey. The most permissive countries towards dishonest-illegal behaviors are all ex-communist countries with Belarus and Slovak Republic being the most permissive countries whereas the strictest ones are Northern Cyprus and Turkey.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arboretti Giancristofaro, R., Bonnini, S., & Salmaso, L. (2007). A performance indicator for multivariate data. Quaderni di Statistica - Journal of Methodological and Applied Statistics, 9, 1–29.
Arboretti Giancristofaro, R., Bonnini, S., & Salmaso, L. (2009). Employment status and education/employment relationship of PhD graduates from the University of Ferrara. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36(12), 1329–1344.
Barbulescu, R., & Beaudonnet, L. (2014). Protecting us, protecting Europe? Public concern about immigration and declining support for European integration in Italy. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15, 216–237.
Beugelsdijk, S., & Klasing, M. J. (2016). Diversity and trust: The role of shared values. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44, 522–540.
Coumans, M., & Schmeets, H. (2015). The socially excluded in the Netherlands: The development of an overall index. Social Indicators Research, 122(3), 779–805.
Crissman, P. (1942). Temporal changes and sexual difference in moral judgments. Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 29–38.
EVS. (2016). European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4800 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12458.
Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, composite indicators and measurement scales: An example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 165, 233–261.
Gelfand, M. (2018). Rule makers, rule breakers: How tight and loose cultures wire our world. New York: Scribner.
Gelfand, M. C., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.
Gupta, M., Uz, I., Esmaeilzadeh, P., Noboa, F., Mahrous, A. A., Kim, E., et al. (2018). Do cultural norms affect social network behavior inappropriateness? A global study. Journal of Business Research, 85, 10–22.
Harding, S., & Phillips, D. (1986). Contrasting values in Western Europe. Unity, diversity and change. London: Macmillan.
Harrington, J. R., Boski, P., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015). Culture and national well-being: Should societies emphasize freedom or constraint? PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127173.
Harrington, J. R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990–7995.
Hsu, A. (2016). Environmental performance index. Technical report, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2016). Social justice and social order: Binding moralities across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0152479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152479.
Jiang, D., Li, T., & Hamamura, T. (2015). Societies’ tightness moderates age differences in perceived justifiability of morally debatable behaviors. European Journal of Ageing, 12, 333–340.
Katz, R. C., Santman, J., & Lonero, P. (1994). Findings on the revised morally desirable behaviors scale. The Journal of Psychology, Interdisciplinary and Applied, 128(1), 15–21.
Marozzi, M. (2015). Measuring trust in European public institutions. Social Indicators Research, 123, 879–895.
Minkov, M., Blagoev, V., & Hofstede, G. (2013). The boundaries of culture: Do questions about societal norms reveal cultural differences? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(7), 1094–1106.
Moors, G., & Wennekers, C. (2003). Comparing moral values in Western European countries between 1981 and 1999. A multiple group latent-class factor approach. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 44(2), 155–172.
Munda, G., Nardo, M., Saisana, M., & Srebotnjak, T. (2009). Measuring uncertainties in composite indicators of sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 11, 7–26.
Nevitte, N., & Cochrane, C. (2006). Individualization in Europe and America: Connecting religious and moral values. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 203–230.
Nowak, A., Gelfand, M., Borkowki, W., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2017). Autocratic recidivism, in values, political action, and change in the Middle East and the Arab Spring. New York: Oxford University Press.
OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris: OECD.
Pittel, S. M., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1966). Measurement of moral values: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 22–35.
Saisana, M., D’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40, 165–177.
Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 168, 307–323.
Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81, 65–77.
Storm, I. (2016). Morality in context: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between religion and values in Europe. Politics and Religion, 9, 111–138.
Taylor, J., & Eitle, D. (2015). The moderating role of BIS/BAS personality tendencies in the relationship between general strain and crime. Deviant Behavior, 36(11), 874–889.
United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Human development reports. New York: UNDPD.
Uz, I. (2015). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(3), 319–335.
Vauclair, C. M. (2010). What is right? What is wrong? And does the answer tell something about culture? An investigation into culture and morality using the values concept. Ph.D. Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Vauclair, C. M., & Fisher, R. (2011). Do cultural values predict individuals’ moral attitudes? A cross-cultural multilevel approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 645–657.
Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2009). Comparing MCDA aggregation methods in constructing composite indicators using the Shannon-Spearman measure. Social Indicators Research, 94, 83–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marozzi, M. Perceived Justifiability Towards Morally Debatable Behaviors Across Europe. Soc Indic Res 153, 759–778 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02490-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02490-w