Understanding and Opinion on Sustainable Development Among Youths in Higher Educational Institutions in Penang, Malaysia

Abstract

The implementations of sustainable development are a global trend and recently focus on Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Agenda. Furthermore, in ensuring the successful implementation of the Agenda, youths play a vital role in spreading awareness, knowledge and good practices in sustainable development. This research aims to determine the respondents’ level of understanding as well as opinion about sustainable development values. A questionnaire survey was conducted at six higher education institutions in Penang, yielding a total of 402 respondents. Data were analysed statistically using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Based on data that has been analysed by the SPSS software, the mean result showed that respondents have a high level of understanding concerning sustainable development. Besides, the mean result also presented that respondents had positive and strong support for sustainable development. Furthermore, a Mann–Whitney test showed that there are no significant differences between gender on understanding sustainable development. Similarly, a Mann–Whitney test indicates that there are no differences between the field of study. Thus, based on the findings, it is hoped that this study could provide an insight to policy makers and educational institutions in involving the youth in decision-making process and in planning better programs to promote sustainable development in Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ahmad, A. L., Rahim, S. A., Pawanteh, L., & Ahmad, F. (2012). The understanding of environmental citizenship among Malaysian youths: A study on perception and participation. Asian Social Science, 8(5), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n5p85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alshuwaikat, H. M., & Abubakar, I. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1777–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, H. E., Cohen, F. G., & Warner, A. (2009). Youth and environmental action: Perspectives of young environmental leaders on their formative influences. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.27-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Awan, A. G. (2013). Relationship between environment and sustainable economic development: A theoretical approach to environmental problems. International Journal of Asian Social Science 2, 3(3), 741–761.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Badd. (2019). Do other countries have arts and science stream in their schools, like Malaysia? Retrieved May 25, 2019, from https://cilisos.my/actually-how-do-malaysias-academic-streaming-system-compare-to-other-countries/.

  6. BERNAMA. (2016). UPM voted Asia’s Best Green Campus, world’s top 17 in 2015. Retrieved January 10, 2019, from https://www.malaymail.com/s/1047855/upm-voted-asias-best-green-campus-worlds-top-17-in-2015.

  7. Brown, K. (2015). The internet: An opportunity for sustainable development. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-internet-an-opportuni_b_8514084.

  8. Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2013). An understanding of sustainability and education for sustainable development among German student teachers and trainee teachers of chemistry. Science Education International, 24(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2rp20137b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly 2, 56(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Centre for Global Sustainability Studies (CGSS). (2009). USM-APEX sustainability roadmap. George Town: Centre for Global Sustainability Studies (CGSS).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Converse, P. E. (1987). Changing conceptions of public opinion in the political process. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(2), 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corcoran, P. B., Hezri, A. A., Hollingshead, B. P., Koshy, K. C., Weakland, J. P., & Hamid, Z. A. (2012). The ethical dimension of sustainability in higher education: Applying the principles of the Earth Charter in Malaysia & beyond. George Town: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Craig, C. A., & Allen, M. W. (2013). Sustainability information sources: Employee knowledge, perceptions, and learning. Journal of Communication Management, 17(4), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-05-2012-0035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daniels, D. P., Krosnick, J. A., Tichy, M. P., & Tompson, T. (2013). Public opinion on environmental policy in the United States. In S. Kamieniecki & M. Kraft (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 461–486). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Filho, Walter Leal, Manolas, E., & Pace, P. (2015). The future we want: Key issues on sustainable development in higher education after Rio and the UN decade of education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Filho, W. Leal, Raath, S., Lazzarini, B., Vargas, V. R., Souza, L. De, Anholon, R., et al. (2018). The role of transformation in learning and education for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hui, Y. X., & Phang, F. A. (2015). Science and arts streams students’ scientific epistemological beliefs. International Education Studies, 8(13), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jannah, M., Halim, L., Meerah, T. S. M., & Fairuz, M. (2013). Impact of Environmental Education Kit on students’ environmental literacy. Asian Social Science, 9(12 SPL ISSUE), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joseph, C., Nichol, E. O., Janggu, T., & Madi, N. (2013). Environmental literacy and attitudes among Malaysian business educators. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371311312897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kementerian Sukan dan Belia Malaysia. (n.d.). Dasar Belia Malaysia. Kementerian Belia dan Sukan Malaysia.

  22. Koshy, K. C., Abdul Rahim, A., Khelghat-Doost, G., & Jegatesen, G. (2013). Disaster Risk Management for Sustainable Development (DRM-SD): An integrated approach. Penang: Centre for Global Sustainability Studies (CGSS).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities Robert. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laurie, R., Nonoyama-tarumi, Y., Mckeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2016). Contributions of education for sustainable development (ESD) to quality education: A synthesis of research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leong, L. M., Nur, A. A., Herizal, H., & Mulakala, A. (2012). The youth factor: 2012 survey of Malaysian youth opinion. The Asia Foundation. Retrieved July 25, 2019, from https://asiafoundation.org/2012/12/13/the-asia-foundation-launches-the-youth-factor-2012-survey-of-malaysian-youth-opinion/.

  26. McCann, J. (2013). No time for the family? You are not alone: Parents and children spend less than an hour with each other every day because of modern demands. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2363193/No-time-family-You-Parents-children-spend-hour-day-modern-demands.html.

  27. McCombs, M. (2002). The agenda setting role of the mass media in the shaping of the public opinion. In Proceedings of the mass media economics conference 2000, London.

  28. Michalos, A. C., Kahlke, P. M., Rempel, K., Lounatvuori, A., MacDiarmid, A., Creech, H., et al. (2015). Progress in measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development among tenth grade students in Manitoba. Social Indicators Research, 123(2), 303–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Munamati, M., Nhapi, I., & Misi, S. (2016). Exploring the determinants of sanitation success in Sub-Saharan Africa. Water Research, 103, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nazirah, Z. A. (2010). Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers. Habitat International, 34(4), 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nyoni, D. (2009). Youth participation in addressing global challenges. In P. B. Corcoran & P. M. Osano (Eds.), Young people, education, and sustainable development (pp. 85–90). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Official Portal for Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2017). Population quick info. Retrieved April 20, 2017, from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cone&menu_id=b2RVUmEyZ2ZZYXhaUzUrdnpsaWozdz09.

  33. Ogendi, G. M., & Ong’oa, I. (2009). Water accessibility, use and conservation among youth: A comparative study. In P. B. Corcoran & P. M. Osano (Eds.), Young people, education, and sustainable development (pp. 221–227). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Portal Rasmi Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang. (2015). Be green, make a difference campaign. Retrieved October 7, 2017, from https://www.penang.gov.my/kenyataan-akhbar/3229-be-green-make-a-difference-campaign.

  35. Reza, M. I. H. (2016). Sustainability in higher education: Perspectives of Malaysian higher education system. SAGE Open, 6(3), 2158244016665890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saadatian, O., Haw, L. C., Mat, S., Sopian, K., Dalman, M., & Salleh, E. (2011). Sustainable development in Malaysia: Planning and initiatives. Recent Researches in Chemistry, Biology, Environment and Culture, in the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Environment, Ecosystems and Development (EED '11), 138–143.

  37. Shabudin, A. F. A., Rahim, R. A., Nor, N. M., & Ibrahim, K. (2016). Antarctic values and Malaysia’s involvement in Antarctica: Perceptions among young citizens of Malaysia. Polar Record, 52(3), 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shah, R. (2015). 2014 Malaysian youth population. Putrajaya: Institut Penyelidikan Pembangunan Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Solangi, K. H., Badarudin, A., Kazi, S. N., Lwin, T. N. W., & Aman, M. M. (2013). Public acceptance of solar energy: The case of Peninsular Malaysia. In IEEE 2013 TenconSpring, conference proceedings (pp. 540–543).

  40. Stamm, K., Clark, F., & Eblacas, P. (2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sumiri, S. (2008). Public Participation on sustainable development: Investigation of the level of sustainable environmental development understanding and awareness (Master's thesis). Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

  42. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’ s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. UNECSO. (2015a). UNESCO global action programme on education for sustainable development: Information folder. Paris, France. UNESCO. Retrieved September 15, 2018, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246279.

  44. UNECSO. (2015b). Mediterranean Youth Survey: Responses towards sustainable development and the current crisis. Retrieved February 20, 2016, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/single-view/news/mediterranean_youth_survery_responses_towards_sustainable_de/.

  45. UNESCO. (2005a). UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 20052014: The DESD at a glance. Paris.

  46. UNESCO. (2005b). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014): International implementation scheme. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  47. United Nations. (2015). Young people must be at centre of sustainable development agenda, speakers say, as general assembly marks anniversary of World Programme of Action for youth. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from http://www.un.org/press/en/2015/ga11648.doc.htm.

  48. United Nations Environment Programme. (n.d.). Children and youth in sustainable development. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from http://www.unep.org/documents.multilingual/default.asp?DocumentID=52&ArticleI%09=73&l=en.

  49. Vasi, I. B. (2012). Public support for sustainable development: A mile wide, but how deep? The Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Walshe, N. (2008). Understanding students’ conceptions of sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 537–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. WCED. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Whitmarsh, L. (2008). What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming”. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Youth Affairs Council of Victoria. (2004). Taking young people seriouslyConsulting young people about their ideas and opinions: A handbook for organisations working with young people. Melbourne: Youth Affairs Council of Victoria, Office for Youth, Department for Victorian Communities

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is made possible by the support of the Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University (Individual) Grant Number 1001.PCGSS.816265.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theam Foo Ng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ariffin, F.N., Ng, T.F. Understanding and Opinion on Sustainable Development Among Youths in Higher Educational Institutions in Penang, Malaysia. Soc Indic Res 147, 421–437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02165-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Education for sustainable development
  • Higher education
  • Sustainability
  • Young citizen
  • Malaysia