An Investigation into the Reported Closing of the Nicaraguan Gender Gap

Abstract

For the last 5 years, the World Economic Forum’s annual Global Gender Gap Index has been reporting that Nicaragua is one of the most gender equal countries in the world. This is the culmination of a remarkable increase in gender equality in Nicaragua during the past decade, charted by the same index. This paper discusses the Index and the Nicaraguan context and then refers to the results of several waves of the Latinobarometer to investigate whether the change in gender equality has affected Nicaraguans’ (and particularly Nicaraguan women’s) perceptions of their lives. The underlying question is therefore whether satisfaction with life, and opinions about gender equality have, for Nicaraguans, altered between the period when Nicaragua was placed low on the gender equality ranking to when it had attained a high rating on the index just a few years later. The findings, which come from ordered probit regression analysis, reveal slight evidence of improvements over this time period and emphasise the importance of economic fundamentals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    The WEF published a report similar to the index in 2005 which covered 58 countries, however Nicaragua was not one of them (Moitra and Kelly 2013).

  2. 2.

    A full list of these 14 ratios is provided in the “Appendix”.

  3. 3.

    The Nicaraguan poet and political activist Gioconda Belli summarises some views on what effective female representation might look like, and how it can fail: “It is a big step to have women as presidents, but in the patriarchal structure of power we have all inherited, very often women are still forced to prove that they are as “tough” as the toughest of men. A woman president who would defy the masculine model of power and infuse it with the feminine ethic of caring and real equality is still in the making” (Belli 2016).

  4. 4.

    A common explanation in developing countries for a small gender gap for economic variables is that even though female labour force participation is quite low relative to males, female labour market participants have higher average education and skills than male participants. Such indices do not control for this selectivity, and often once controlled for the gender gap re-appears. I thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion about potential additional bias in the GGG Index.

  5. 5.

    The World Bank defines vulnerable employment as contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment. See the detail here for further information: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.EMP.VULN.ZS?view=chart.

  6. 6.

    This is because where Nicaragua is equal first (educational attainment, health and survival), it is equal first with many countries, thus not especially contributing to its high rank, unlike the political empowerment dimension where its equal first position is much less widely shared.

  7. 7.

    2009 appears to be a blip in the trend, with growth for that year being − 3.8%, followed by the economy restarting a period of consistent growth in 2010.

  8. 8.

    This international trade information is from the Atlas of Economic Complexity (www.atlas.cid.harvard.edu).

  9. 9.

    Freely available online (www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jsp).

  10. 10.

    These subjective categories are used here, because the Latinobarometer does not contain absolute wage or income data.

  11. 11.

    A high incidence of self-employment is expected in Nicaragua and indeed more widely in Latin America. The Latinobarometer breaks down the self-employed into four further categories. The generic self-employment category Business Owner is the most frequent, followed by fisherman, and then self-employed within the informal sector. All three categories are much more important (in terms of frequency) for self-employment than the fourth possibility: self-employed professional.

  12. 12.

    Other popular datasets which might ordinarily be considered, for example the World Values Survey, contain no data from Nicaragua.

  13. 13.

    This may reflect, to some extent, revocation of an important provision of Law 779, as discussed in Sect. 2.2.

  14. 14.

    The Latinobarometer does have a question about violence against women, but it was only asked in one year (2006), thus no comparisons can be made between the two periods of interest.

  15. 15.

    Throughout the empirical analysis GDP level was also used as a control instead of GDP growth with very similar results.

  16. 16.

    In all of the estimates, if the level of real GDP is used instead of GDP growth per capita the results are qualitatively unchanged. In the male estimates in Table 2, and in the alternative case of controlling for the level of GDP, the 95% confidence intervals for the narrow period dummy variable do overlap.

  17. 17.

    These results come from estimates using unclustered robust standard errors, with country dummies as part of the controls. Clustering the standard errors on the individuals countries results in very similar coefficients obtained.

  18. 18.

    Adding gender equality as an additional control does not alter the results of Table 2. This is indicative that perceptions of gender equality do not really contribute or moderate the life satisfaction of Nicaraguans.

  19. 19.

    However, if gender inequality causes health problems, then health would be a bad control variable.

  20. 20.

    There are other relevant questions that were not asked in both periods. For example individuals are asked how strongly they agree or disagree with the following statements ‘If the woman earns more than the man, she will almost certainly have problems’ and ‘It is preferable to have the woman in the house and man in his work’. It would be interesting to see how average levels of agreement changed between the two time periods.

References

  1. Aizenman, N. C. (2006). Nicaragua’s total ban on abortion spurs critics. Washington Post. Nov 28:A1, A13.

  2. Altamirano Montoya, Á. J., & Teixeira, K. M. D. (2017). Multidimensional poverty in Nicaragua: Are female-headed households better off? Social Indicators Research, 132, 1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1345-.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambrey, C., Ulichny, J., & Fleming, C. (2017). The social connectedness and life satisfaction nexus: A panel data analysis of women in Australia. Feminist Economics, 23(2), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barns, A., & Preston, A. (2010). Is Australia really a world leader in closing the gender gap? Feminist Economics, 16(4), 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belli, G. (2016) Why has ‘macho’ Latin America elected more female leaders than the US? Theguardian.com. Retrieved April 1, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2016/nov/07/macho-latin-america-elected-more-female-leaders-than-us.

  6. Blázquez Vilaplana, B., & Ruiz Seisdedos, S. (2002) Mujer y poder político en Centroamérica: El caso de Nicaragua y Panamá. Ponencia presentada al Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Política. Salamanca, 2002.

  7. Chen, L. J. (2010). Do gender quotas influence women’s representation and policies? The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 7(1), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson, C., Veliziotis, M., Pacheco, G., & Webber, D. J. (2015). Is temporary employment a cause or consequence of poor mental health? A panel data analysis, Social Science & Medicine, 134, 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Downward, P. M., & Dawson, P. (2016). Is it pleasure or health from leisure that we benefit from most? An analysis of well-being alternatives and implications for policy. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 443–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebbers, I., & Piper, A. (2017). Satisfactions comparisons: Women with families, full-time and part-time self-employed. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-11-2016-0046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellsberg, M., Peña, R., Herrera, A., Liljestrand, J., & Winkvist, A. (2000). Candies in hell: Women’s experiences of violence in Nicaragua. Social Science and Medicine, 51(11), 1595–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Entra en vigencia Ley 779 con “las manos peladas”. (2012). Elnuevodiario.com. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from https://www.elnuevodiario.com.ni/nacionales/255536-entra-vigencia-ley-779-manos-peladas/.

  13. Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311429379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Espinoza-Delgado, J., & Klasen, S. (2018). Gender and multidimensional poverty in Nicaragua: An individual-based approach. World Development, 110, 466–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrant, G. (2014). Time use as a transformative indicator for gender equality in the post-2015 agenda. http://www.oecd.org/dev/poverty/Time%20use%20_final_2014.pdf. Accessed Aug 2018.

  16. Flores, S., Evans, K., Larson, A. M., Pikitle, A., & Marchena, R. (2016). La participación de mujeres indígenas rurales para fortalecer la gobernanza comunitaria. CIFOR Infobrief 2016 No. 140 p. 4, p. ref. 13.

  17. Frey, B., Stutzer, A., Benz, M., Meier, S., Luechinger, S., & Benesch, C. (2008). Happiness: A revolution in economics. MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhhtv. Accessed Aug 2018.

  18. Gibbons, J., & Luna, S. (2015). For men life is hard, for women life is harder: Gender roles in Central America. In S. Safdar & N. Kosakowska-Berezecka (Eds.), Psychology of gender through the lens of culture. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Graham, C. (2012). Happiness around the world: The paradox of happy peasants and miserable millionaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Htun, M. N., & Jones, M. P. (2002). Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: Electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In N. Craske (Ed.), Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America (pp. 32–56). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Human Rights Watch. (2017). Nicaragua: Abortion ban threatens health and lives. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/07/31/nicaragua-abortion-ban-threatens-health-and-lives.

  22. Jackson, C. (1996). Rescuing gender from the poverty trap. World Development, 24(3), 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jantsch, A., Wunder, C., & Hirschauer, N. (2016). Lebensqualität in Deutschland–Ein Vergleich von ländlichen und städtischen Regionen. In 56th annual conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28–30, 2016 (No. 244798). German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).

  24. Joffe, C. E., Weitz, T. A., & Stacey, C. L. (2004). Uneasy allies: Pro-choice physicians, feminist health activists and the struggle for abortion rights. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(6), 775–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lancaster, R. N. (1994). Life is hard: Machismo, danger, and the intimacy of power in Nicaragua. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ley Integral Contra la Violencia Hacia las Mujeres y Reformas a la Ley 641 “Código Penal”. (2012). Sistema de Información sobre la Primera Infancia en América Latina, UNESCO, Retrieved April 26, 2018, from http://www.sipi.siteal.iipe.unesco.org/normativas/683/ley-ndeg-7792012-ley-integral-contra-la-violencia-hacia-las-mujeres-y-reformas-la-ley.

  27. Luchsinger, G. (2017). UN women annual report 20162017. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2017/un-women-annual-report-2016-2017-en.pdf?la=en&vs=0.

  28. Luffy, S. M., Evans, D. P., & Rochat, R. W. (2015). “It is better if i kill her”: Perceptions and opinions of violence against women and femicide in Ocotal, Nicaragua, after law 779. Violence and Gender, 2(2), 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Menjívar, C. (2011). Enduring violence: Ladina women’s lives in Guatemala. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moitra, S., & Kelly, K. (2013). World economic forum global gender gap report (2005). In M.Z. Stange, C.K. Oyster, & J.E. Sloan (Eds.), The multimedia encyclopedia of women in today’s world encyclopedia of women in today’s world. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452270388.

  31. Morrison, P. S., & Weckroth, M. (2018). Human values, subjective well-being and the metropolitan region. Regional Studies, 52(3), 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mujeres en política: nada que celebrar. (2016). Laprensa.com. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from https://www.laprensa.com.ni/2016/03/08/politica/1998298-mujeres-politica-nada-celebrar.

  33. Nicaragua. (2012). Ley N° 779. Retrieved April 26, 2018, from http://www.sipi.siteal.iipe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/sipi_normativa/ley_no._779_ley_integral_contra_la_violencia_-nicaragua.pdf.

  34. Nicaragua Ortega Claims Progress in Gender Equality Doubts Persist. (2013). Courvyint.com. Caribbean & Central America—November. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from http://www.courcyint.com/component/k2/item/58431-nicaragua-ortega-claims-progress-in-gender-equality-doubts-persist.html.

  35. Nicaragua Sube Ranking Mundial Equidad. (2017). Elnuevo.com.ni. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from https://www.elnuevodiario.com.ni/nacionales/445335-nicaragua-sube-ranking-mundial-equidad-genero/.

  36. Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 107(445), 1815–1831.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327(5965), 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Piper, A. T. (2015a). Heaven knows i’m miserable now: Overeducation and reduced life satisfaction. Education Economics, 23(6), 677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Piper, A. T. (2015b). Europe’s capital cities and the happiness penalty: An investigation using the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research, 123, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0725-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Piper, A. T. (2018). Adult life satisfaction: Largely (though not wholly) contemporaneous? A system general method of moments dynamic panel analysis. MPRA paper 85601, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  41. Piscopo, J. M. (2015). States as gender equality activists: The evolution of quota laws in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(3), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nicaraguan women may have to negotiate with their abusers. Ipsnews.net. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/05/nicaraguan-women-may-have-to-negotiate-with-their-abusers/.

  43. Ritchie, A., Lloyd, C. B., & Grant, M. (2004). Gender differences in time use among adolescents in developing countries: Implications of rising school enrollment rates. New York, New York, Population Council, 2004. 30 pp. Policy Research Division Working Papers No. 193.

  44. Ruiz Seisdedos, S., & Grande Gascón, M. (2015). Participación política y liderazgo de género: Las presidentas latinoamericanas. América Latina Hoy, 71, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh201571151170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sagot, M. (2010). Does the political participation of women matter? Democratic representation, affirmative action and quotas in Costa Rica. IDS Bulletin, 41(5), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2007). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. World Bank. (2017a). Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.EMP.VULN.MA.ZS?locations=NI.

  48. World Bank. (2017b). Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.EMP.VULN.FE.ZS?locations=NI.

  49. World Bank. (2018). GDP growth (annual %). Retrieved May 07, 2018, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2016&locations=NI&start=2006.

  50. World Economic Forum. (2006). The global gender gap report. World Economic Forum, Geneva. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2006.pdf.

  51. World Economic Forum. (2016). Measuring the global gender gap. World Economic Forum, Geneva. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2016/measuring-the-global-gender-gap/.

  52. World Economic Forum. (2017). The global gender gap report. World Economic Forum, Geneva. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2017.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Amina Ahmed Lahsen for research assistance, and two anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Piper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7 and 8.

Table 7 The components of Global Gender Gap Index
Table 8 Overall Global Gender Gap Index, Economic Participation and Opportunity sub-index, and Political Empowerment sub-index for Nicaragua, 2006–2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piper, A. An Investigation into the Reported Closing of the Nicaraguan Gender Gap. Soc Indic Res 144, 1391–1413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02080-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nicaragua
  • Gender equality
  • Global Gender Gap Index
  • Life satisfaction
  • Latinobarometer

JEL Classification

  • I31
  • N36