Municipal Environmental Management Indicators: A Bottom-Up Approach Applied to the Colombian Context

Abstract

The participation of local governments is one of the determining factors for achieving the objectives of sustainable development, whereby municipalities must have planning, assessment, control instruments, and indicators which will lead to proper environmental management and sustainable development. In this respect the existing models of sustainability indicators reflect, mainly, the state of the environment. However, these indicators do not allow the identification of the state of the environment’s direct responsible actors and do not contribute towards the formulation of specific objectives and goals for each of the responsible actors. Furthermore, the sustainable development indicators are elaborated and measured by higher level entities, and are aimed towards a regional and national level, using a top-down approach. In this context, this paper proposes a model of environmental management indicators that lets us observe the state of the environment and identifies those responsible for that state. The set of indicators was developed in the municipalities of the department of Nariño, Colombia, through a participatory bottom-up approach which includes: the vision and needs of the stakeholders, who are responsible for the information, and the vision of the regional control organisms. Thus, a set of 40 environmental management indicators was formulated, and a framework to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the local environmental management was proposed. Their application indicates that a majority of the municipalities are in a weak environmental management situation and it lets the stakeholders critically analyze their performance through the set of indicators and also identify areas for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Atkinsson, A. (1996). Developing indicators of sustainable community: Lessons from sustainable Seatle. Enviromental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4–6), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, S., Morse, S., & Shah, R. (2012). Understanding stakeholder participation in research as part of sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, 101, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bluszcz, A. (2016). A comparative analysis of selected synthetic indicators of sustainability. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bovea, M., Ibáñez-Forés, V., & Colomer-Mendoza, F. (2010). Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. Waste Management, 30, 2383–2395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombia. (1993a). Ley 42 de 1993. Organización del sistema de control financiero, Colombia.

  6. Colombia. (1993b). Ley 99 de1993. Ley Ambiental Colombiana, Colombia.

  7. Contraloría General de la República. (2010). Estado de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente 20092010. La sostenibilidad ambiental urbana: un reto para Colombia, Bogotá, DC.

  8. Coutinho, S. M. V., & Malheiros, T. F. (2013). Indicadores de sustentabilidade local: Caso de Ribeirão Pires—SP. In A. Philippi Jr. & T. F. Malheiros (Eds.), Indicadores de sustentabilidade e gestão ambiental (1st ed., pp. 189–222). Barueri: Manole.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Criollo, R. (2014). Gestión Ambiental Municipal: Una propuesta de indicadores. Universiadade de São Paulo. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18139/tde-08092015-150634/es.php.

  10. Daams, M. N., & Veneri, P. (2017). Living near to attractive nature? A well-being indicator for ranking Dutch, Danish, and German functional urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 133(2), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1375-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahl, A. L. (2012). Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. (2015). Necesidades básicas insatisfechas. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-sociales/necesidadesbasicas-insatisfechas-nbi.

  13. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2015). Tipologías Departamentales y Municipales: Una propuesta para comprender las entidades territoriales colombianas. Bogota, DC. Retrieved February 1, 2016, from https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/DesarrolloTerritorial/Tip-FormatoPublicacion.pdf.

  14. Duarte, C. G., Gaudreau, K., Gibson, R. B., & Malheiros, T. F. (2013). Sustainability assessment of sugarcane-ethanol production in Brazil: A case of sugarcane mill in São Paulo state. Ecological Indicators, 30, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. European Environment Agency. (2014). Digest of EEA indicators 2014EEA Technical report No 8/2014. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/digest-of-eea-indicators-2014.

  16. European Environment Agency. (2015). The European environmentState and outlook 2015: Synthesis report. Copenhagen.

  17. Fraser, E., Dougill, A., Mabee, W., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78, 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gibson, R., Hassan, S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., & Whitelaw, G. (2005). Sustainability assessmentCriteria and process (Earthscan, Ed.), London.

  19. Gómez-Limón, J., & Arriaza, M. (2011). La construcción de indicadores sintéticos de sostenibilidad agraria. In J. Gómez-Limón & M. Arriaza (Eds.), Evaluación de la sostenibilidad de las explotaciones de olivar en Andalucía (pp. 111–133). Málaga: Analistas Económicos de Andalucía.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Greene, K., & Tonjes, D. (2014). Quantitative assessments of municipal waste management systems: Using different indicators to compare and rank programs in New York State. Waste Management, 34, 825–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gutiérrez, F., Barberena, V., Garay, L., & Ospina, J. (2010). In Fundación Konrad Adenauer en Colombia (Ed.), 25 años de la descentralización en Colombia. Colombia. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/23110-1442-4-30.pdf.

  22. Hak, T., Kovanda, J., & Weinzettel, J. (2012). A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators: Application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic’s Sustainable Development Strategy. Ecological Indicators, 17, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Herva, M., Neto, B., & Roca, E. (2014). Environmental assessment of the integrated municipal solid waste management system in Porto. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kostevšek, A., Petek, J., Čuček, L., & Pivec, A. (2013). Conceptual design of a municipal energy and environmental system as an efficient basis for advanced energy planning. Energy, 60, 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Malheiros, T. F., Philippi, A., Jr., & Coutinho, S. M. (2008). Agenda 21 nacional e indicadores de desenvolvimento sustentável: contexto brasileiro. Saúde E Sociedade, 17(1), 07–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meadows, D. (1998). In T. S. Institute (Ed.), Indicators and information systems for sustainable development: A report to the Balaton Group. Hartland: The Sustainability Institute. Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://donellameadows.org/archives/indicators-and-information-systems-for-sustainable-development/.

  27. Petrosillo, I., De Marco, A., Botta, S., & Comoglio, C. (2012). EMAS in local authorities: Suitable indicators in adopting environmental management systems. Ecological Indicators, 13(1), 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente. Consorcio Parceria 21. (2008). Metodología para la elaboración de informes GEO Ciudades: Manual de aplicación. In Pnuma (Ed.), Ciudad de Panamá.

  29. Quiroga, R. (2009). Guía metodológica para desarrollar indicadores ambientales y de desarrollo sostenible. Serie Manuales No. 61. In CEPAL (Ed.), Santiago de Chile.

  30. Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. (2011). The natural choice: Securing the value of nature, United Kingdom.

  31. Sotelo, J. A., Tolón, A., & Lastra, X. (2011). Indicators by and for sustainable development: A case study. Estudios Geográficos, LXXII(271), 611–654. https://doi.org/10.3989/estgeogr.201124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tayra, F., & Ribeiro, H. (2006). Modelos de indicadores de sustetabilidade: síntese e avaliação crítica das principais experiências. Saúde E Sociedade, 15(1), 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Torres-Delgado, A., & López, F. L. (2014). Measuring sustainable tourism at the municipal level. Annals of Tourism Research, 49, 122–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://www.un-documents.net/agenda21.htm.

  35. United Nations. (2015). Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, Colombia Herramientas de aproximación al contexto local. Bogotá, DC. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://www.humanumcolombia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ODS-Colombia.compressed.pdf.

  36. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2002a). Guia de gestión administrativa para la aplicación del SIGAM. In O. G. Editores (Ed.). Bogotá, DC: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.

  37. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2002b). Propuesta organizacional Sistema de Gestión Ambiental Municipal SIGAM. In O. Gráficas (Ed.). Bogotá, DC: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.

  38. Veleva, V., & Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: Framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 519–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization. (2015). Environmental health inequalities in Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Supplementary Information

Online participatory questionnaire available at: https://es.surveymonkey.com/r/MPQTF3F Last accessed July 31st 2015.

Results for the questionnaire are available at: https://es.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-DK6R6MYY/ Last accessed July 31st 2015.

Results of the application of indicators years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 in: www.gestionambiental.udenar.edu.co.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruby Criollo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Criollo, R., Malheiros, T. & Alfaro, J.F. Municipal Environmental Management Indicators: A Bottom-Up Approach Applied to the Colombian Context. Soc Indic Res 141, 1037–1054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1864-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Municipal environmental management
  • Environmental management indicators
  • Nariño—Colombia
  • Participatory approaches