A Proposal for a Model-Based Composite Indicator: Experience on Perceived Discrimination in Europe
- 157 Downloads
In social sciences the need often arises to compare and rank groups of respondents by analyzing huge amounts of data and composite indicators are amongst the most effective tools. The paper aims to design an original procedure suitable for ordinal data and able to synthesize subjective evaluations while accounting for both agreement and heterogeneity in response patterns. A composite indicator for ordinal data based on cub models is introduced: the proposal discloses and preserves the heterogeneity also at an aggregated level. Empirical evidence relies on perceived discrimination analysis stemming from the Special Eurobarometer Survey 2015.
KeywordsComposite indicators Ordinal data Heterogeneity cub models Perceived discrimination
This research has been partially funded by the CUBREMOT project (code: RBFR12SHVV) of the University of Naples Federico II, Italy. Authors thank very much Editor and Anonymous Referees for their critical comments and suggestions.
- Baert, S. (2017). Hiring discrimination: An overview of (Almost) all correspondence experiments since 2005. GLO discussion paper, 61.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2007). Tackling multiple discrimination: Practices, policies and laws. Directorate general for employment, social affairs and equal opportunities, Unit g.4. http://ec.europa.eu.
- European Commission. (2016). Special Eurobarometer 437, Discrimination in EU, Brussels.Google Scholar
- E.U. Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2011). Handbook on European non-discrimination law, European Court of Human Rights. http://fra.europa.eu.
- Fattore, M., & Maggino, F. (2014). Partial orders in socio-economics: A practical challenge for poset theorists or a cultural challenge for social scientists? In R. Bruggemann, L. Carlsen, & J. Wittmann (Eds.), Multi-indicator systems and modelling in partial order. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Fattore, M., & Maggino, F. (2017). Some considerations on well-being evaluation procedures, taking the cue from .“Exploring multidimensional well-being Switzerland: Comparing three synthesizing approaches”. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1634-0.
- Fattore, M., Maggino, F., & Arcagni, A. (2015). Exploiting ordinal data for subjective well-being evaluation. The Measurement of Subjective Well-Being in Survey Research, 16(3), 409–428.Google Scholar
- Fattore, M., Maggino, F., & Colombo, E. (2012). From composite indicators to partial order: Evaluating socio-economic phenomena through ordinal data. In F. Maggino & G. Nuvolati (Eds.), Quality of life in Italy: Research and reflections. Social indicators research series 48, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Greenacre, M. J. (1993). Correspondence analysis in practice. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2014). Inference for CUB models: A program in R. Statistica & Applicazioni, XII, 177–204.Google Scholar
- Iannario, M., Piccolo, D., & Simone, R. (2017). CUB: A class of mixture models for ordinal data. R package version 1.1.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CUB.
- Johnson, R., & Wichern, D. W. (2013). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (6th ed.). Pearson: Pearson New International Edition.Google Scholar
- Maggino, F. (2009). The state of the art on indicators construction in the perspective of a comprehensive approach in measuring well-being of societies. Archivio E-Prints, Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
- Manly, B. (1994). Multivariate statistical methods. London: Champamn & Hall.Google Scholar
- McLachlan, G. (2004). Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition., Wiley series in probability and statistics New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, OECD statistics working paper. Revised edition, 2008.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators, Methodology and user guide, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
- Piccolo, D. (2003). On the moments of a mixture of uniform and shifted binomial random variables. Quaderni di Statistica, 5, 85–104.Google Scholar
- Piccolo, D. (2006). Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quaderni di Statistica, 8, 33–78.Google Scholar
- Punzo, G., Castellano, R., & Buonocore, M. (2017). Job satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: Reasoning between feeling and uncertainty through CUB models. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1715-0.
- Simone, R., & Tutz, G. (2017). Dealing with response styles in finite mixture models. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Workshop on Statistical Modelling (pp. 223–228). Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Tutz, G. (2012). Regression for categorical data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Zanarotti, M. C., & Pagani, L. (2015). Some considerations to carry out a composite indicator for ordinal data. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 8(3), 384–397.Google Scholar